Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,396 
Comments
-
They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
It's never gaurantee that Sark will plunger anyone. The overarching theme to his time at UW was his inexplicable tendency to lose games he should win and win a few he should lose. I don't see us winning but it's coin flip odds.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Only if we bring a caged Trojan to practice.
-
Pete and Lindy take this one, in a Sark what the fuq moment. The young guys prove to be motivated and hungry
-
Disagree. Sark plungers the teams he should beat* and gets plungered by the teams he needs to beat to turn the corner.SpoonieLuv said:
It's never gaurantee that Sark will plunger anyone. The overarching theme to his time at UW was his inexplicable tendency to lose games he should win and win a few he should lose. I don't see us winning but it's coin flip odds.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
Stanford and USC with their back up QBs were his only surprise wins. That and the Holiday Bowl that brought us back to glory.
*excludes road game coin flips pretty much anywhere but Corvallis. -
You mean like the Oregon State game?RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Also, the line by Alicia de Artola that wonders if Pete will be more motivated to beat the school that rejected him in favor of Sark couldn't be more false or poorly researched.
My conclusion is Sark has officially 2 holed her. She has subscribed to his "Access for Access" program Kim can't quit. -
Only one person in this picture knows how to operate a plunger.
Pete looks embarrassed to be seen with this clown. -
Down vote for no 75k ;-)bananasnblondes said:
You mean like the Oregon State game?RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
The Cult of Sarkinality has Sark roaming the CenturyLink sideline in a few years.SpoonieLuv said:Only one person in this picture knows how to operate a plunger.
Pete looks embarrassed to be seen with this clown.
#Script
-
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
SC I think will struggle to defend the run and they won't be great at running the ball either. If UW can hold the SC passing by getting pressure on Kessler and covering their WRs (who aren't as good a group as last year)...I think it'll be competitive and in the 'Sark fuck up' zone.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
Bye week helps UW here as well.
-
When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?
-
DisagreeUWerentThereMan said:When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?
-
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
-
Slow your roll Sugarshittube and get Sarks dick out of your crusty stank blowhole. You are clueless. 9-3 at best. More likely 8-4.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
Just because Kim Sark and Fatters used you as their jizz dumpster all those years, doesn't mean you have to keep servicing them here. You're free.
-
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff. -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year. -
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
You mean like the Boston College game?RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
-
Fair assessment. I don't think they will end up better than last year. So that's an 8-4 type team. I would think UW will be around a TD underdog. Unless UW is an absolute dumpster fire, I don't think it'll be a plungering. Talent is a problem but coaching, especially with an extra 5 days prep, will narrow that gap.RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
Last year's thursday night home game SC didn't manage to put away Cal. Cal almost made a big comeback even though SC brought out the shiny helmets and a new velvet curtain for the Coliseum tunnel. I see a similar type game happening, where SC very likely wins but UW hangs within 7-10 pts the entire game. -
-
You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
Puppylove_SugarSteve strikes again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive. -
Shaking head in disbelief. At least Tomas isnt trying to be funnyBallSacked said:
You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
