Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

With Sark being the consensus favorite to win pac12..

2456723

Comments

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    And you have another car to wipe down at the car wash. Hop to...
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,788 Founders Club

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
    What does that have to do with anything? And only Pete's one year at Washington. Pete at Boise is superior to Slingblade so far
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
    What does that have to do with anything? And only Pete's one year at Washington. Pete at Boise is superior to Slingblade so far
    Boise is the key word here.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
    What does that have to do with anything? And only Pete's one year at Washington. Pete at Boise is superior to Slingblade so far
    Boise is the key word here.
    You are very confusing, or stupid, or smart. Either way, interesting.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
    What does that have to do with anything? And only Pete's one year at Washington. Pete at Boise is superior to Slingblade so far
    Boise is the key word here.
    You are very confusing, or stupid, or smart. Either way, interesting.
    This is one time I'm positive it's not abundance
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,242

    Pac12 will have a slew of top10-25 level 'good' teams but no top 10 level great teams. I actually think Cal and Colorado will start winning more games and become bowel elligible (15 extra practices!1!1!!!).

    Coogs and Beavs are probably terrible, entire conference runs a train on them. I think Utah makes a major slip this year.

    Oregon or Stanford in North. Both are 10-2 MAX type teams.

    Any of the 4 LA/AZ schools could win the south, doubt it's Sark - hell fuck it up with that defense. I'm going to be a homer and pick UCLA to take the south (new QB, but 18 returning starters and bruins get beavs while SC/ASU get the ducks).

    You have Jim Mora. HTH.
    You have Slingblade
    Slingblade >>>>>> Peet at this point in time.
    What does that have to do with anything? And only Pete's one year at Washington. Pete at Boise is superior to Slingblade so far
    Boise is the key word here.
    You are very confusing, or stupid, or smart. Either way, interesting.
    This is one time I'm positive it's not abundance
    Let's be honest, if you are betting against Duck + Smart in the same sentence, you'll win at least an 81% of the time clip.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,845 Founders Club
    Sark is going to Sark. Stanford is probably the favorite for me. One of the Zona schools will probably emerge somehow to represent the south. USC does have some incredible talent though, I pray it's not a Ron Zook to Urban Meyer transition once Siete gets canned.