There has been improvement. The team is still just good enough to not get blown out by the better teams, hang with but lose to the mid tier teams, and beat the bad ones. It's not a huge improvement but it's better than the team that struggled to get past Hawaii.
Yes and no. There has been some improvement, but it was only two weeks ago that we got destroyed by UCLA. We looked good in portions earlier in the year (Illinois, Cal).
Let's face it, we were playing a team with lessor talent and their W/L record shows it. But there are some signs that the game is slowing down for Miles, which is a big plus.
I watched basically all of the HI game and this game. There's clear improvement.
Like I've mentioned, they've lost to the same teams and gave it away to AZ. That kicker might make 5 out of 10 47 yarders and that's generous. Some of it's bad luck. Am I happy with 3-5? No way, but go down the list of very good and elite coaches. They don't kick ass in year one.
I just want to see wins. Simple as that. Improve all you fucking want, a 1 point loss to arizona is still a 1 point loss. Sure, maybe I shouldnt expect it in year one, but im sorry, being a doormat for a decade has made me this way. Fuck you and your moral victories
The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...or
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Which really is a special brand of stoopid.
I hear a couple of store's are having a Black Friday sale, HTH:
Learn the correct plural non-possessive, plural possessive, singular possessive and singular non-possessive forms, and then pop off about linguistic software.
The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...or
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
If you make Kim Grinolds posts don't be surprised if someone points it out.
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think weeding out 9 losers and developing freshmen to replace them is a failure you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think players aren't better now than in September you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Petersen burned it down and is building it back while treading water record wise.
You and Kim can reminisce about all the great talent Sark left. Those of us with half a brain will watch Petersen build a program
Comments
How is it we lost that many games?
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12.
Yay, miles made a couple passes, wee
We are back guys go dawgs
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
Like I've mentioned, they've lost to the same teams and gave it away to AZ. That kicker might make 5 out of 10 47 yarders and that's generous. Some of it's bad luck. Am I happy with 3-5? No way, but go down the list of very good and elite coaches. They don't kick ass in year one.
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
4-5 in this shit tier conference is complete failure.
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion.
"Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid."
Ok, those statements appear to have the same exact meaning.
I hear a couple of store's are having a Black Friday sale, HTH:
You stoopid Mick.
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think weeding out 9 losers and developing freshmen to replace them is a failure you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think players aren't better now than in September you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Petersen burned it down and is building it back while treading water record wise.
You and Kim can reminisce about all the great talent Sark left. Those of us with half a brain will watch Petersen build a program