anyone who can't see improvement in this team from the 1st game till now
Comments
-
Yep. I watch the D in games like tonight and say "what the fuck?"
How is it we lost that many games? -
Dude, tonight guaranteed they will not have beaten a team (EWU does not count) with a winning record during the regular season.
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12. -
Wooo we look improved against the beavers. Woo
Yay, miles made a couple passes, wee
We are back guys go dawgs -
Disappointment? Sure. "Complete failure"? Nah.IrishDawg22 said:Dude, tonight guaranteed they will not have beaten a team (EWU does not count) with a winning record during the regular season.
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12. -
There has been improvement. The team is still just good enough to not get blown out by the better teams, hang with but lose to the mid tier teams, and beat the bad ones. It's not a huge improvement but it's better than the team that struggled to get past Hawaii.
-
Yes and no. There has been some improvement, but it was only two weeks ago that we got destroyed by UCLA. We looked good in portions earlier in the year (Illinois, Cal).
-
This game just showed some of the potential on offense if UW has good QB play. Thanks to Oregon State and their abysmal defense.
-
The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick -
Let's face it, we were playing a team with lessor talent and their W/L record shows it. But there are some signs that the game is slowing down for Miles, which is a big plus.
-
I watched basically all of the HI game and this game. There's clear improvement.
Like I've mentioned, they've lost to the same teams and gave it away to AZ. That kicker might make 5 out of 10 47 yarders and that's generous. Some of it's bad luck. Am I happy with 3-5? No way, but go down the list of very good and elite coaches. They don't kick ass in year one. -
I just want to see wins. Simple as that. Improve all you fucking want, a 1 point loss to arizona is still a 1 point loss. Sure, maybe I shouldnt expect it in year one, but im sorry, being a doormat for a decade has made me this way. Fuck you and your moral victories
-
Good thing my seahawks have another championship opportunity today, you wanna see improvement, watch a pete carroll coached team
-
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
-
Which really is a special brand of stoopid.RaceBannon said:Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
-
This.IrishDawg22 said:Dude, tonight guaranteed they will not have beaten a team (EWU does not count) with a winning record during the regular season.
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12.
4-5 in this shit tier conference is complete failure.
Simple fact, case closed, end of discussion. -
Cant wait until we eek by the cougs so we can talk about how great miles is all off season
-
"As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12."creepycoug said:
Which really is a special brand of stoopid.RaceBannon said:Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
"Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid."
Ok, those statements appear to have the same exact meaning.
I hear a couple of store's are having a Black Friday sale, HTH:
-
Learn the correct plural non-possessive, plural possessive, singular possessive and singular non-possessive forms, and then pop off about linguistic software.IrishDawg22 said:
I hear a couple of store's are having a Black Friday sale, HTH:creepycoug said:
Which really is a special brand of stoopid.RaceBannon said:Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
You stoopid Mick.
-
If you make Kim Grinolds posts don't be surprised if someone points it out.IrishDawg22 said:
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think weeding out 9 losers and developing freshmen to replace them is a failure you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think players aren't better now than in September you're mick fucking stupid.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Petersen burned it down and is building it back while treading water record wise.
You and Kim can reminisce about all the great talent Sark left. Those of us with half a brain will watch Petersen build a program -
Yeah, I know... if only SARK! was still coach, right?IrishDawg22 said:Dude, tonight guaranteed they will not have beaten a team (EWU does not count) with a winning record during the regular season.
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12.
-
There sure a lot of miserable fucks on this board.
-
Always about the backs with you.RaceBannon said:
If you make Kim Grinolds posts don't be surprised if someone points it out.IrishDawg22 said:
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid. -
Trying to find where I made those two statements.RaceBannon said:
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.IrishDawg22 said:
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Sorry, you have entered a no spin zone.
Race has reached He_Needs_More_Cock territory in this thread.
-
When we win, Petersen is great and look at the improvement. When we lose, the talent sucks and it doesn't matter anyways.
We beat Oregon State. We played fairly well against Arizona. We do look improved, especially Miles, but it's not enough to make any big proclamations. -
"big" proclamations like this team has improved over the course of this season?
-
We played well in some games earlier in the year. We still aren't very good. If we win the next two, it will be something to celebrate.sarktastic said:"big" proclamations like this team has improved over the course of this season?
In 2009 we shut out the Cougs and plungered Cal to end the year. In 2010, we won 4 straight to close the year. I said we look improved. Who gives a shit though? -
The hope is it spills over into the apple cup and and bowl game...keep the momentum and no one gets into any fights in the off season.
An off season natty could really help going into next fall.
Victor, biearra, vea, Mathis, qualls, dissly, Gaines, bowman I think provide some hope for the D.
Chris Warren would be a huge get. -
Disagree. 9-5 against this fucktarded schedule is nothing to celebrate.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well in some games earlier in the year. We still aren't very good. If we win the next two, it will be something to celebrate.sarktastic said:"big" proclamations like this team has improved over the course of this season?
In 2009 we shut out the Cougs and plungered Cal to end the year. In 2010, we won 4 straight to close the year. I said we look improved. Who gives a shit though? -
Some people on this board seem to have an agenda. This season sucked. Wasted a ton of talent on defense with a shitty offense. Petersen gets paid a lot of money to figure it out. He didn't at least before losing 5 conference games. Hope next year is better but our personnel will take a hit.
So far in one year not impressed. Recruiting looks to be going pretty good. Don't fire Petersen because that would be stupid. Let it play out but this year was shitty. -
Trust me, our elite posters are still here, but they're lurking and not posting.jecornel said:There sure a lot of miserable fucks on this board.
<--------------
