anyone who can't see improvement in this team from the 1st game till now
Comments
-
Jesus fucking hail mary christ, guys.
-
Anyone who thinks I speak in seahawk cliches like "championship opportunities" needs to kill themselves
-
He was right.RaceBannon said:
You said we had the talent to beat everyone but OregonIrishDawg22 said:
Trying to find where I made those two statements.RaceBannon said:
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.IrishDawg22 said:
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Sorry, you have entered a no spin zone.
Race has reached He_Needs_More_Cock territory in this thread.
Own your stupidity
Dont try to spin out of it Obama
Arizona was the second best team Washington played.
-
Yet another vote for 4-5 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4MisterEm said:
Wtf'ed because we don't deal in hypotheticals.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree. 9-5 against this fucktarded schedule is nothing to celebrate.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well in some games earlier in the year. We still aren't very good. If we win the next two, it will be something to celebrate.sarktastic said:"big" proclamations like this team has improved over the course of this season?
In 2009 we shut out the Cougs and plungered Cal to end the year. In 2010, we won 4 straight to close the year. I said we look improved. Who gives a shit though?
Sark won 8 last year as Pete has won 7.
No gift wins for Sark or Pete.
Fair is fair. -
He backed out of it. Because it isn't true.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He was right.RaceBannon said:
You said we had the talent to beat everyone but OregonIrishDawg22 said:
Trying to find where I made those two statements.RaceBannon said:
My post is a statement of fact. If you think Miles and The committee of backs are better than Price and Sankey you're mick fucking stupid.IrishDawg22 said:
I am confused, is this the 4-5 > 5-4 post of the week...orRaceBannon said:The girls here were complaining about not beating the cupcakes good enough in the pre season.
Thats the improvement. Individuals and the team are better now. Kids developed.
Like the op said if you don't see it you don't want to. Saying this team had the second best talent in the league is mick fucking stupid.
Go suck Sark's recruiting dick
0-12 talent total rebuild post of the week...or
something to do with the Doucheman.com obsession, black & white, etc.
And nice subtle change to the talent statement. But of course you gotta get in a Sark reference, because "new" standard around here for a UW coach is just don't be that guy.
Keep shooting, you may finally hit something.
If you think we should be 12-1 you're mick fucking stupid.
Sorry, you have entered a no spin zone.
Race has reached He_Needs_More_Cock territory in this thread.
Own your stupidity
Dont try to spin out of it Obama
Arizona was the second best team Washington played.
He changed it to we could compete with everyone but Oregon and we did.
-
What u talking bout Irish? This was a .400 team under SarkIrishDawg22 said:Dude, tonight guaranteed they will not have beaten a team (EWU does not count) with a winning record during the regular season.
Coach Pete may turn out to be the guy, but I am pretty sure he would agree that Season 1 has been a complete failure.
As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12. -
jesus christ. theres a thread on hooks.net with the majority of posters giving the team a 100% shot of winning the sb again... citing stats that dont exist obviously... maybe im conditioned by years and years of heart break but theres a high possibility that seattle could have a mass suicide on their hands should the hooks come up short. the bandwagon will certainly thin out should the season be a "failure"
-
The bandwagon is here to stay. The 12's ain't going anywhere. The Seahawks will be contenders for at least the next few years. It will take losing records, not losing in the playoffs for the bandwagon to thin out.phineas said:jesus christ. theres a thread on hooks.net with the majority of posters giving the team a 100% shot of winning the sb again... citing stats that dont exist obviously... maybe im conditioned by years and years of heart break but theres a high possibility that seattle could have a mass suicide on their hands should the hooks come up short. the bandwagon will certainly thin out should the season be a "failure"
-
The biggest threat to the Hawks going forward will be figuring out what to do with Lynch and the WR position to surround Wilson with offensive weapons. They are already doing a great job of keeping the core of the defense together.
This is a team that has every opportunity to be a Steelers/Cowboys of the 70s, 49ers of the 80s, the Cowboys of the 90s, and the Patriots of the 00s kind of team winning multiple Super Bowls over a 6-8 year span. -
None of those teams you mention had to deal with the SALARY CAP and none of them played a ranked Oregon State.
-
I don't think WR is as big of issue as many make it out to be. The OL is more of a concern imo. It's a run first offense, that is tough to put up big numbers as a WR. Look at what Tate did in Seattle vs what he did in Detroit.Tequilla said:The biggest threat to the Hawks going forward will be figuring out what to do with Lynch and the WR position to surround Wilson with offensive weapons. They are already doing a great job of keeping the core of the defense together.
This is a team that has every opportunity to be a Steelers/Cowboys of the 70s, 49ers of the 80s, the Cowboys of the 90s, and the Patriots of the 00s kind of team winning multiple Super Bowls over a 6-8 year span.
Richardson and Norwood should improve. Baldwin is pretty good. Kearse isn't a #2, but he's a fine 4 or 5. They could certainly use another solid target, but they are adequate.
With the OL, Okung is going to need to be paid. That's risky because you don't want to lose your LT, but he's not worth what he will get as a free agent. Unger's play had slipped because of injuries. He's not the sure thing he was a few years ago. Sweezy is a fine guard. After that, there isn't much. There won't be much money to spend on the OL, so there will be a need to draft and develop.
