The New Sark
Comments
-
So fucking stupid.RaceBannon said:Or how Oregon lit a bunch of money on fire
-
Lambo didn’t have any super faggy tats that I can recall.RaceBannon said:
Usually. Almost alwaysYellowSnow said:Meet the new Sark. Same as the old Sark.
But still, I can remember @Dennis_DeYoung and @CokeGreaterThanPepsi cackling like a couple of school girls when Oregon hired Meat.
Oregon finds a way.
But I really think Lannbo is more Willie or Mark
-
The new Sark will make his mark come Sept 9…
-
Who the fuck do y'all think you're kidding, Lambo is Helf. FFS.
-
Disagree. Wasn’t UCLA undefeated going into that game and still considered the hot team? Utah had an injured QB.ntxduck said:
Utah is a better win than either of those.WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle. -
Me Oregon or abundance?dtd said:
So fucking stupid.RaceBannon said:Or how Oregon lit a bunch of money on fire
-
Sark is a mediocre coach. There are tons of mediocre coaches. Therefore, there are tons of coaches that are like Sark.ntxduck said:Every coach is sark potd
-
There's more to Sark comparisons than the mediocrity. He has his own kind of renewable hype train that never gets backed up by substance but keeps getting renewed.Fenderbender123 said:
Sark is a mediocre coach. There are tons of mediocre coaches. Therefore, there are tons of coaches that are like Sark.ntxduck said:Every coach is sark potd
The point of comparing Lanning to him is simply predicting a similar future. I haven't made such a statement that I can remember but I enjoy them because it's funny and that's what I hope for. It's fun, it's funny, and it's the best thing for the sake of everyone. -
UCLA better win at the time. Utah a better win at the end of the season.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Disagree. Wasn’t UCLA undefeated going into that game and still considered the hot team? Utah had an injured QB.ntxduck said:
Utah is a better win than either of those.WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle. -
WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.
-
Top ten all time favoriteKaepsknee said:WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle. -
I can’t bee leeve that was 6 years ago.RaceBannon said:
Top ten all time favoriteKaepsknee said:WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.
