Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The New Sark

1235»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,638 Founders Club
    Kaepsknee said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    ntxduck said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?

    It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.

    Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.

    Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
    Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.

    I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.

    Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.

    Top ten all time favorite
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    RaceBannon said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    ntxduck said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?

    It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.

    Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.

    Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
    Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.

    I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.

    Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.

    Top ten all time favorite
    I can’t bee leeve that was 6 years ago.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter