The New Sark
Comments
-
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA? -
Race with another Oregon meltdown take.
Water is wet.
LOL.................. -
The capital lol really packs a punch on everyone of your posts
-
I'm just giving you props and the proper respect the elderly deserve. -
-
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle. -
Meet the new Sark. Same as the old Sark.
But still, I can remember @Dennis_DeYoung and @CokeGreaterThanPepsi cackling like a couple of school girls when Oregon hired Meat.
Oregon finds a way.
-
Usually. Almost alwaysYellowSnow said:Meet the new Sark. Same as the old Sark.
But still, I can remember @Dennis_DeYoung and @CokeGreaterThanPepsi cackling like a couple of school girls when Oregon hired Meat.
Oregon finds a way.
But I really think Lannbo is more Willie or Mark -
Mario and Neu have the exact same conference records and nearly identical overall. Each won a RB, Mario with the better bowl record. Pretty fair comparison, very good recruiters but meh in the coaching department.WoolleyDoog said:
Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.ntxduck said:
It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.WoolleyDoog said:Only guys I think compared to Sark are:
Sumlin
Crisco
Lanning
Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.
Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.
Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.
Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.
Mario and Harbaugh would have been a nice matchup because both love the big OL's and mashing. Chip's O would have scored at will, while Mario would have tried to grind it out and use clock, to no avail. And he would have done it the Herbert at QB. -
