Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The New Sark

RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
Or how Oregon lit a bunch of money on fire




· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,760 Swaye's Wigwam
    Happy for our grellow friends! Dan's a bright, articulate, charming, engaging guy who is also competitive as hell. Grandslam.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,601 Founders Club
    Canadawg said:

    Happy for our grellow friends! Dan's a bright, articulate, charming, engaging guy who is also competitive as hell. Grandslam.

    Has he put his demons behind him though?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,732
    Every coach is sark potd
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    Every coach is sark potd

    What can I say?

    Lambo didn't get a raise for inventing Oregon football

    Still my real comp

    But failing up is pure Sark
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,732
    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    Every coach is sark potd

    What can I say?

    Lambo didn't get a raise for inventing Oregon football

    Still my real comp

    But failing up is pure Sark
    Sark could only dream of winning ten games. You said Cristobal was sark for years, too. We get it. Every coach you dont like is sark.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    Every coach is sark potd

    What can I say?

    Lambo didn't get a raise for inventing Oregon football

    Still my real comp

    But failing up is pure Sark
    Sark could only dream of winning ten games. You said Cristobal was sark for years, too. We get it. Every coach you dont like is sark.
    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,623 Swaye's Wigwam
    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,575
    What's the buyout?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,732
    edited July 2023
    WoolleyDoog said:

    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?

    It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.

    Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.

    Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Race with another Oregon meltdown take.

    Water is wet.

    LOL..................
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club
    The capital lol really packs a punch on everyone of your posts
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    I'm just giving you props and the proper respect the elderly deserve.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,623 Swaye's Wigwam
    ntxduck said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?

    It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.

    Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.

    Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
    Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.

    I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.

    Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,464 Founders Club
    Meet the new Sark. Same as the old Sark.

    But still, I can remember @Dennis_DeYoung and @CokeGreaterThanPepsi cackling like a couple of school girls when Oregon hired Meat.

    Oregon finds a way.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,063 Founders Club
    YellowSnow said:

    Meet the new Sark. Same as the old Sark.

    But still, I can remember @Dennis_DeYoung and @CokeGreaterThanPepsi cackling like a couple of school girls when Oregon hired Meat.

    Oregon finds a way.

    Usually. Almost always

    But I really think Lannbo is more Willie or Mark
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    WoolleyDoog said:

    ntxduck said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    Only guys I think compared to Sark are:

    Sumlin
    Crisco
    Lanning

    Two just happened to coach for Oregon and two have a lot of similarities, though Crisco seemed actually more like Neuheisel to me.

    Why extend Lanning and now? What's he done. His second best win an absolute white knuckler vs the Coug? Getting some weirdo mid 4 star commits from random locales?

    It’s a 1 year extension. That’s pretty much standard practice now, to always keep your HC on a 5 year contract. They’ll probably extend him again next offseason, too. It also increases the buyout, which is understandable after mullens has lost 2 straight HCs because he didn’t make the buyout high enough. If lanning sucks, Oregon will have no problem paying it. They’re not UW basketball.

    Also, all three coaches you listed are more successful than Sark. Sumlin and cristo have won ny6 games. Sark has never even sniffed one.

    Lanning’s second best win would probably be blowing out UCLA?
    Fair to Sumlin that he did some impressive stuff early at A&M. Also did at Houston. He's not a fair comparison.

    I stand by Crisco being more like Neu with the one NY6 win. Crisco got to coach in a dogs hit Pac that a Sark UW team or two would have had bigger success in. The Chipper Oregon and Harbaugh/Shaw Stanford teams which blocked Sark would have run freight trains on Crisco yearly had he had to coach against them.

    Um, pretty sure beating UCLA was Lanning's best win. Second one is arguably the North Carolina miracle.
    Mario and Neu have the exact same conference records and nearly identical overall. Each won a RB, Mario with the better bowl record. Pretty fair comparison, very good recruiters but meh in the coaching department.

    Mario and Harbaugh would have been a nice matchup because both love the big OL's and mashing. Chip's O would have scored at will, while Mario would have tried to grind it out and use clock, to no avail. And he would have done it the Herbert at QB.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    RaceBannon said:


    Legend.

    Clearly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.