Not sure about this indictment
Comments
-
This is the NY statute verbatim.AOG said:
is this linked to NY state law?HHusky said:§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony. -
Federal campaign finance law, got it.HHusky said:
At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.Bob_C said:
What was the second crime?HHusky said:§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
-
34 COUNTS
FELONIES
Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty -
I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link -
You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.RaceBannon said:34 COUNTS
FELONIES
Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty -
H still thinks Mueller found something but let it slide
Like Comey did for Hillary
H is going to melt down when his daddy beats the bogus charges -
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.AOG said:I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked. -
I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got CaponeHHusky said:
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.AOG said:I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked. -
It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.AOG said:
I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got CaponeHHusky said:
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.AOG said:I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked. -
Juice! Juice! Juice!Bob_C said:
You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.RaceBannon said:34 COUNTS
FELONIES
Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
