Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Not sure about this indictment

AOG
AOG Member Posts: 2,706
edited April 2023 in Tug Tavern
I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    edited April 2023
    I think this is a tax issue like Al Capone? Maybe the law expense could be written off, but not hush payments. Probably the law expense could be written off, but the hush money would be taxed differently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    Use your brain a little.

    You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,875 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023
    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    When the person accusing has denied it happened several times and is suing you for doing it and you have to hire lawyers it's a legal expense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    Use your brain a little.

    You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.
    I must have been thinking "injured party" from civil cases, right
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    edited April 2023
    Interesting take.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,480 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    I cackled IRL like an idiot hyena.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    edited April 2023
    I found this: "The key legal question in the case was always how the district attorney would take the charge of falsifying business records — a misdemeanor — and make a felony of it. The statement of facts suggests that the second crime here that would trigger a felony charge is a violation of election law."

    This is why it seems more like a misdemeanor to me. It is, except for the prosecution's novel idea to make it felony due to election. I don't like this strategy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,853
    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    Sounds like a rough day for you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Lol when this all gets downgraded to misdemeanors and like a fine the Dems might literally kill Bragg
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    I think it was what they got Cohen for, invalid campaign contribution???
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    edited April 2023
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

    See, John Edwards.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    is this linked to NY state law?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Lol when this all gets downgraded to misdemeanors and like a fine the Dems might literally kill Bragg

    Daddy's going to strike a plea deal? Artful!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    AOG said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    is this linked to NY state law?
    This is the NY statute verbatim.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.
    Federal campaign finance law, got it.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,147 Founders Club
    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,739 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

    You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,147 Founders Club
    H still thinks Mueller found something but let it slide

    Like Comey did for Hillary

    H is going to melt down when his daddy beats the bogus charges
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,706
    edited April 2023
    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    AOG said:

    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
    It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,978
    Bob_C said:

    RaceBannon said:

    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

    You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
    Juice! Juice! Juice!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter