Not sure about this indictment

HHusky

AOG said:

HHusky said:

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

is this linked to NY state law?

This is the NY statute verbatim.

Bob_C

HHusky said:

Bob_C said:

HHusky said:

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

Federal campaign finance law, got it.

RaceBannon

34 COUNTS

FELONIES











Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

AOG

I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

Bob_C

RaceBannon said:

34 COUNTS

FELONIES











Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.

RaceBannon

H still thinks Mueller found something but let it slide

Like Comey did for Hillary

H is going to melt down when his daddy beats the bogus charges

HHusky

AOG said:

I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

AOG

HHusky said:

AOG said:

I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone

HHusky

AOG said:

HHusky said:

AOG said:

I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone

It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.

HHusky

Bob_C said:

RaceBannon said:

34 COUNTS

FELONIES











Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.

Juice! Juice! Juice!