Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Not sure about this indictment

24

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    AOG said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.


    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    is this linked to NY state law?
    This is the NY statute verbatim.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,633 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.


    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.
    Federal campaign finance law, got it.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,050 Founders Club
    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,829
    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,633 Swaye's Wigwam

    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

    You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,050 Founders Club
    H still thinks Mueller found something but let it slide

    Like Comey did for Hillary

    H is going to melt down when his daddy beats the bogus charges
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,829
    edited April 2023
    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    AOG said:

    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
    It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    Bob_C said:

    34 COUNTS

    FELONIES











    Not available in every state
    Some restrictions may apply
    An indictment is not a conviction
    All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

    You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
    Juice! Juice! Juice!
  • AOGAOG Member Posts: 1,829
    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    HHusky said:

    AOG said:

    I found a reference https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

    I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

    They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
    I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
    It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.
    I really don't care about this one but "find me 10k votes or else" is a crime IMO
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,623
    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    That's legal
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    Goduckies said:

    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    That's legal
    You could be Daddy's lawyer.

    Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,050 Founders Club
    Daddy 187,000, H 0
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,623
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.


    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

    See, John Edwards.
    That the FEC declined.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

    A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
    when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
    degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
    another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.


    Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

    What was the second crime?
    At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

    See, John Edwards.
    That the FEC declined.
    He was tried.
  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,623
    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    That's legal
    You could be Daddy's lawyer.

    Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
    So it's a crime to lie ona loan application? There is a reason they have appraisers.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,980
    Trump should switch his parties to be a dem. Then I'd be all for locking him up
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,949
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    Goduckies said:

    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    That's legal
    You could be Daddy's lawyer.

    Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
    So it's a crime to lie ona loan application? There is a reason they have appraisers.
    Things TugCons ask.

    Ummmm, hate to break it to you, YES.

    You might want to lawyer up.
Sign In or Register to comment.