Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Not sure about this indictment

AOG
AOG Member Posts: 2,846
edited April 2023 in Tug Tavern
I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345678

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,414 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,846
    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,846
    edited April 2023
    I think this is a tax issue like Al Capone? Maybe the law expense could be written off, but not hush payments. Probably the law expense could be written off, but the hush money would be taxed differently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,414 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    Use your brain a little.

    You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,846
    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,737 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2023
    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was a set of expenses for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    When the person accusing has denied it happened several times and is suing you for doing it and you have to hire lawyers it's a legal expense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,846
    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    I get that the business record was falsified, but I don't see who the injured party is. It was an expense for hush money classified as legal expense. Not a flame, I just don't get it...

    Since when does there need to be an injured party in criminal law?
    I don't know. Where is Lawdawg or somebody?
    Use your brain a little.

    You voted for this nanny state. Breaking a gun law doesn't create an injured party, there are a million other similar examples.
    I must have been thinking "injured party" from civil cases, right
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,414 Founders Club
    edited April 2023
    Interesting take.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    jecornel said:

    All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

    I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
    I cackled IRL like an idiot hyena.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter