To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0
Comments
-
I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
If we did begin two up, two down, then really struggled, I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired. But if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made a great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work. -
I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work. -
He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work. -
why do you guys call Sark Pool Boy?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work. -
Fixed it up after 4-0.RaceBannon said:
At which point Kim asks what does that asshole Race Bannon and his minions have to say now? After UW is 4-0.Houhusky said:UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next. -
Doogs sure are hypocritical cunts aren't they?MikeDamone said:
Can't you just be happy withHe_Needs_More_Time said:I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.
Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.4-0?4-1?4-2?
The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.
Just like in recruiting if a kid UW is after signs elsewhere in June it's met with "awful warm for February". If UW signs a kid in June and you bring up how it's a long ways from signing day you are met with "Kids who commit this early never decommit ever". -
I'm surprised Faber College Grad hasn't shown up hereTravis Morris said:
why do you guys call Sark Pool Boy?Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.
-
ftfyFire_Marshall_Bill said:
He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging forTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.
I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.BetsyMarion the Librarian's token blessing. -
Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton. -
Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.Steve_Bowman said:Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
-
Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.Tailgater said:
Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.Steve_Bowman said:Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton. -
dtd said:
Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 4th year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.Tailgater said:
Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.Steve_Bowman said:Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton. -
Tosh hasn't had time.....problem is he never will.
UW will never get elite talent with a head coach that's little more than a glorified/token leader of a frat house, whose primary skills are choreographing dance routines and pulling cool stunts at recruit's houses.
We're really lucky to have the few guys we have that are real football players considering the clown Mr Cream Puff.dtd said:
Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.Tailgater said:
Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.Steve_Bowman said:Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton. -
What about the BSU team that beat UW?Houhusky said:
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon -
Why do you hate Wide Receivers?Steve_Bowman said:Tosh hasn't had time.....problem is he never will.
UW will never get elite talent with a head coach that's little more than a glorified/token leader of a frat house, whose primary skills are choreographing dance routines and pulling cool stunts at recruit's houses.
We're really lucky to have the few guys we have that are real football players considering the clown Mr Cream Puff.dtd said:
Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.Tailgater said:
Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.Steve_Bowman said:Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.
Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton. -
I had a little belly laugh but Sark at home in the first game of the year is different than Sark in an "away" bowl game striving to maintain 7-6Mooser42 said:
What about the BSU team that beat UW?Houhusky said:
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon -
How so?Houhusky said:
I had a little belly laugh but Sark at home in the first game of the year is different than Sark in an "away" bowl game striving to maintain 7-6Mooser42 said:
What about the BSU team that beat UW?Houhusky said:
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon -
USCWell you are being fucktarded College. A first year head coach just doesn't put the pieces of a Ty Willy team and go on the road and beat. ANY ND team. This was one of Sarks best coaching performances, same with LSU and obviously USC.CollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
I've contended all along the 2009 was Snark's best coaching job and best team. Got repeatedly banned for it by those mushy cunts at fagman. His teams have went downhill since. But to rail on him for 2009 is ignant (they were a 7-6 (except for ND refs and Polk call, saw same thing with Stanford and Stephan Taylor last year, exact!)
and we played pretty fucking well vs Hawaii. 21-zip in 1st quarter and a solid win, showing Sark can make adjustments (although Holtard couldn't). Otherwise you're spot on doogie!
-
Bad Pointpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
USCWell you are being fucktarded College. A first year head coach just doesn't put the pieces of a Ty Willy team and go on the road and beat. ANY ND team.CollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
I've contended all along the 2009 was Snark's best coaching job and best team. Got repeatedly banned for it by those mushy cunts at fagman. His teams have went downhill since. But to rail on him for 2009 is ignant (they were a 7-6 (except for ND refs and Polk call, saw same thing with Stanford and Stephan Taylor last year, exact!)
Decent point.
and we played pretty fucking well vs Hawaii. 21-zip in 1st quarter and a solid win, showing Sark can make adjustments (although Holtard couldn't). Otherwise you're spot on doogie!
Bad point.
-
Why does collegedoog hate trends? Sark the last three years has had a 3+ game win streak(in two of those years a 4 game win streak) which leads into a 3+game losing streak or is coming off of a 3+ game losing streak.
Why I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three. I don't see UW starting off 2-2 or even 1-3 which is asinine. Sark isn't Ty, he's average. To be average you don't bottom out like that. -
The rewriting of history. Ty was average just like Sark.He_Needs_More_Time said:Why does collegedoog hate trends? Sark the last three years has had a 3+ game win streak(in two of those years a 4 game win streak) which leads into a 3+game losing streak or is coming off of a 3+ game losing streak.
Why I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three. I don't see UW starting off 2-2 or even 1-3 which is asinine. Sark isn't Ty, he's average. To be average you don't bottom out like that. -
*Bump*CollegeDoog said:
UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.Houhusky said:UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next. -
What does that asshole college doog have to say now!!!1!!!
-
His silence in this thread speaks volumes.MikeDamone said:What does that asshole college doog have to say now!!!1!!!
-
CollegeDoog is quite possibly the biggest Noog on this bored!!111!!1!
-
Mods?CuntWaffle said:CollegeDoog is quite possibly the biggest Noog on this bored!!111!!1!
-
He_Needs_More_Time disagrees!!!!!!!CuntWaffle said:CollegeDoog is quite possibly the biggest Noog on this bored!!111!!1!
-
I wanted them to start 1-3 just so I could be right.
![[Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/9a297bf014c1b89df45e7c59b363baaa_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
