To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
Comments
-
I'd be shocked if they start 2-0.
Sark gonna Sark.
And yes, the annual three game midseason losing streak is a given this year. -
If we play like we have in past openers against Boise, we will lose. I think we should win, but it will be a close game that could go either way.
We should beat Illinois, but then again, it is a road game. Probably another game that will be close. Illinois is supposed to be bad, but they are have to be better than WSU was last year.
Tough to know what to expect with Arizona. They are probably going to go with a freshman at QB. If they don't get good QB play, we should win rather easily. However, if they get good QB play, it's a coin toss.
I don't know what to expect. I won't be all that surprised by 2-2, 3-1, or 4-0. -
In other words, The season is over.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd be shocked if they start 2-0.
Sark gonna Sark.
And yes, the annual three game midseason losing streak is a given this year. -
To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0
Next time you can just PM IrishDoog -
The 2010 face plant at BYU spawned that sayingCollegeDoog said:
In other words, The season is over.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd be shocked if they start 2-0.
Sark gonna Sark.
And yes, the annual three game midseason losing streak is a given this year. -
Mute pointCollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
UW could start the year 4-0 or 0-4 and will still finish 7-6. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I'd be shocked if they start
21-0.
Sark gonna Sark.
And yes, the annual three game midseason losing streak is a given this year. -
You were right then and you've been right ever since. That season sucked and it was the tallest midget in the Steve Sarkisian Circus.RaceBannon said:
The 2010 face plant at BYU spawned that sayingCollegeDoog said:
In other words, The season is over.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'd be shocked if they start 2-0.
Sark gonna Sark.
And yes, the annual three game midseason losing streak is a given this year. -
and either way the season would be a push from woodards perspectivegreenblood said:
Mute pointCollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
UW could start the year 4-0 or 0-4 and will still finish 7-6. -
brchco12 said:
and either way the season would be incremental progress from woodards perspectivegreenblood said:
Mute pointCollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
UW could start the year 4-0 or 0-4 and will still finish 7-6. -
Brcho12 said. . .
"and either way the season would be a push from woodards perspective."
And sadly, most fans would agree with Woody.
-
I wouldn't be surprised if we went below .500 with the way our OL is shaping up.
-
Fuck it. I say we go 4-0. I'm too tired for negative shit today. Even if it's reality.
-
-
Bitching about bitching already?DeepSeaZ said:Fuck it. I say we go 4-0. I'm too tired for negative shit today. Even if it's reality.
-
I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
-
Disagree:dhdawg said:I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year. -
But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregongreenblood said:
Disagree:dhdawg said:I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
-
Disagreedhdawg said:
But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregongreenblood said:
Disagree:dhdawg said:I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
2010 at USC
2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts) -
Good points, but the slow starts in Sark's first three seasons were obviously due in large part to his defense early in those seasons being the worst any of us had ever seen. Well managed successful programs often must rely on strong defense in early games, especially on the road, until their offenses catch-up. The Husky defense was significantly better last season after Sark's staff purge the previous Winter and early success in 2013 will largely depend on that improvement continuing. The BSU game will show us immediately if that is at all possible. Beyond that, I must take it one week and one game at a time.CollegeDoog said:What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:
2009
Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.
2010
Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.
2011
We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.
2012
Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.
-
If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that gamegreenblood said:
Disagreedhdawg said:
But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregongreenblood said:
Disagree:dhdawg said:I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
2010 at USC
2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts) -
8-5 actually. But yeah, they weren't that great. But it's still better than anything UW has done with Sark. Also, if many fans think Utah wasn't a quality team, what the fuck does that say about Washington?dhdawg said:
If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that gamegreenblood said:
Disagreedhdawg said:
But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregongreenblood said:
Disagree:dhdawg said:I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH
Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.
2010 at USC
2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts) -
I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.
Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front. -
Can't you just be happy withHe_Needs_More_Time said:I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.
Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.4-0?4-1?4-2?
The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule. -
I am for the players but against the schedule.MikeDamone said:
Can't you just be happy withHe_Needs_More_Time said:I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.
Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.4-0?4-1?4-2?
The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule. -
UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next. -
At which point Kim asks how many of you would have taken 4-3 with that schedule? The season has a long way to go.Houhusky said:UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.
Fact Checker will say the Huskies are 10-3.
And of course they end up 7-6 -
UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.Houhusky said:UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next. -
You don't have all the screenshots you need yet. You need this one too:CollegeDoog said:
UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.Houhusky said:UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.
Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.
Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.
UW will start 0-4 on its way to another well-earned 0-12. -
UW will start 4-0 and will be rolling along quite nicely, then the trip to stanford in which all of Stanford's blue chip offensive lineman will dominant our shitty "diamonds in the ruff" d line, we lose 35-10 thus starting the yearly midseason losing streak, where we get plunger raped at stan, get our brains beaten in vs oregon, and shit the bed in tempe. And we're well on our way to a 7-6 season, except in this one we'll have a losing record in conference
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
