Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sober Sark?

2

Comments

  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    The most encouraging thing besides the win
    Tequilla said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    Tequilla said:

    The Sark reference is more towards bad in-game management

    KDB had some brutal gaffes tonight in strategy that he got bailed out on

    The 7-2 record is full blown paper tiger

    We are well on our way to a 10-2 record and a big win vs a highly ranked team in a NY6 game on New Years.. the big issue is that everyone is going to lament the loss vs ASU that kept us out of the title series game consideration.
    That’s fucking dreaming

    Cook it … we ain’t beating Oregon

    Winning at Wazzu depends on the weather

    We might win 10 games with the bowl … but that’s schedule driven
    Could be worse, we could have spent a ton of money and hired Campbell.

    The only complaints I have about the team based on this season are running short yardage and all things in the back 7/8 on defense including the staff. If they gut out 9 wins with those warts that’s pretty good for a 4-8 team. Our best defense this year has been the wind and elements.

    That said I am more interested to see how cutthroat we are about the staff and getting immediate contributions from the portal. Without penix next year depending on the roster 6 wins could be more realistic. It’s DeBoer’s job to figure it out and we pay him like a pac 12 bottom feeder to do it. Either way it will be Interesting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Going into the week the SRS was as follows:

    Iowa St = 36
    UW = 40

    Wins and losses obviously matter

    Let’s also realize not all schedules are equal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,243 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2022
    haie said:

    Tequilla said:

    TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:

    Tequilla said:

    The Sark reference is more towards bad in-game management

    KDB had some brutal gaffes tonight in strategy that he got bailed out on

    The 7-2 record is full blown paper tiger

    We are well on our way to a 10-2 record and a big win vs a highly ranked team in a NY6 game on New Years.. the big issue is that everyone is going to lament the loss vs ASU that kept us out of the title series game consideration.
    That’s fucking dreaming

    Cook it … we ain’t beating Oregon

    Winning at Wazzu depends on the weather

    We might win 10 games with the bowl … but that’s schedule driven
    We aren't losing to Wazzu.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    Tequilla said:

    Going into the week the SRS was as follows:

    Iowa St = 36
    UW = 40

    Wins and losses obviously matter

    Let’s also realize not all schedules are equal

    Take this shit to bdtw.com. Losers lose. ISU is a loser program.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Tequilla said:

    Going into the week the SRS was as follows:

    Iowa St = 36
    UW = 40

    Wins and losses obviously matter

    Let’s also realize not all schedules are equal


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Iowa States wins this year:

    West Virginia
    Iowa
    Ohio
    SE Missouri State

    They aren’t going to even make a fucking bowl game this year. Campbells claim to fame is barely beating the shittiest Pac 12 “champion” decades in a diet Rose Bowl game. Woo hoo!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    CuntWaffle said:

    RaceBannon said:

    DeBoer winning close games

    Campbell losing close games

    Tough call

    DeBoer wasn't my first choice but results matter. Same record as Bama!!!! There may be something to his ridiculous winning percentage at the smaller stops along the way. Or not. LIPO

    Who cares about results! All that matters are the Shitty, Really Shitty rankings!
    And analytics man. Every 4th down some moron in the booth is going to start spouting off about analytics and the book without any idea what that actually means

    To the announcer if the play works that's what the analytics called for. Idiots

    And then there is that looks close they might want to take 15 minutes to make sure in replay
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,249 Founders Club
    CuntWaffle said:

    Iowa States wins this year:

    West Virginia
    Iowa
    Ohio
    SE Missouri State

    They aren’t going to even make a fucking bowl game this year. Campbells claim to fame is barely beating the shittiest Pac 12 “champion” decades in a diet Rose Bowl game. Woo hoo!

    aka Rose Bowl lite
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    RaceBannon said:

    DeBoer winning close games

    Campbell losing close games

    Tough call

    DeBoer wasn't my first choice but results matter. Same record as Bama!!!! There may be something to his ridiculous winning percentage at the smaller stops along the way. Or not. LIPO

    Who cares about results! All that matters are the Shitty, Really Shitty rankings!
    And analytics man. Every 4th down some moron in the booth is going to start spouting off about analytics and the book without any idea what that actually means

    To the announcer if the play works that's what the analytics called for. Idiots

    And then there is that looks close they might want to take 15 minutes to make sure in replay
    Peterson was all about the analytics. He would punt down 6 with 2 minutes left on his 40 on 4th and 6. That shit drove us crazy.

    Deboer will go for it in the 2nd quarter if we? Were down 10 because he knows we need to score and he can actually run an offense. Deboer might lose but at least he isn’t being a pussy in the process because of “analytics”.

    Still in LIPO with Deboer but I don’t find myself breaking my TV nearly as often.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,165 Standard Supporter
    Tequilla said:

    Going into the week the SRS was as follows:

    Iowa St = 36
    UW = 40

    Wins and losses obviously matter

    Let’s also realize not all schedules are equal

    Stop with the Campbell fetish.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,671 Swaye's Wigwam
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Tequilla said:

    Going into the week the SRS was as follows:

    Iowa St = 36
    UW = 40

    Wins and losses obviously matter

    Let’s also realize not all schedules are equal

    Iowa State is 4-5. What fucking point are you trying to make? They suck, and no cherry picked ranking of the hundreds of advanced stats available changes that.
    It wasn't even much of a cherry pick. Their SRS being 4 points higher is probably within the margin of error anyways, and they are 4-5, not 7-2. Jesus.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canadawg
    Canadawg Member Posts: 5,263
    insinceredawg said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Deboer has some seriously fucktarded players. McAllister and Perryman are complete assaults on the eyes. No idea if that's on the D staff or if they just #needmoretime. Probably the former, but whatever.

    But the guy can scheme a fucking offense. And he has a big swinging dick in all sorts of unfavorable scenarios that the team somehow pulls off. After so many times it's no longer coincidence. These are scenarios where Sark teams would shit all over themselves like clockwork. Winning is contagious.

    Who is McCallister?
    He's the abortion of a punter than should be investigated for collusion. Check out his stat rankings he's in a heated battle for worst player on the team



    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,040 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,724 Founders Club
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    I get what you're saying, but putting the two side by side it was obvious Deboer better.

    It was fucking annoying reacting like scorned lovers over Campbell, when he wasn't it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,040 Founders Club
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    Some of us also thought Campbell would have been a shit hire and not a big dick move.
    We? Are all message board warriors.

    The administration should probably be better in their evaluations than us.

    They aren't. That's a real problem that doesn't just end with lucking into a coaching hire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    @TheChart appeared at Nick Saban's post game presser when he was asked why he went for two twice when one more point would have won

    He offered to show @TheChart to the media
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,327
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    Some of us also thought Campbell would have been a shit hire and not a big dick move.
    We? Are all message board warriors.

    The administration should probably be better in their evaluations than us.

    They aren't. That's a real problem that doesn't just end with lucking into a coaching hire.
    It’s always a crapshoot. I wanted Campbell before DeBoer. I was also wrong and it is clear ISU plays a needle dick style of football just like Petersen did and has not evolved the last few years.

    DeBoer has done a decent job this season, interested to see if he can get a defense next year and develop a QB.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,457
    edited November 2022
    AtomicDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    Some of us also thought Campbell would have been a shit hire and not a big dick move.
    We? Are all message board warriors.

    The administration should probably be better in their evaluations than us.

    They aren't. That's a real problem that doesn't just end with lucking into a coaching hire.
    It’s always a crapshoot. I wanted Campbell before DeBoer. I was also wrong and it is clear ISU plays a needle dick style of football just like Petersen did and has not evolved the last few years.

    DeBoer has done a decent job this season, interested to see if he can get a defense next year and develop a QB.
    I'm not worried about his QB development. I think he's proved he can do that. Haener? And Penix was good at Indiana, but not anything close to what he's been this year.

    But that D ... ugh. Fresno was pretty good on D his second year there, but long term, can he recruit defense at this level? That's gonna be the thing that determines whether he succeeds or fails. And by succeeds, I mean compete for conference titles every year -- being able to beat teams like Oregon and USC at least as much as they beat UW.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,243 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2022
    Oregon is going to re-do Lanning's contract the year he loses perhaps the 2nd best UO QB of all tim, the entire OL, the best edge, the best DL, the best corner and the best safety.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,040 Founders Club
    Doogles said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    Doogles said:

    It's ok to admit the pearl clutching over not landing Campbell because of the "optics" was idiotic.

    It's also OK to be unhappy with an admin that can't land their top targets, fuck up the process, but then luck into a discount hire.

    Deboner was 4th on the list...massively behind Campbell. We shrivel dicked the hiring process and did very typical UW upper campus shit.

    The fact the Deboner might turn out to be the better hire is a massive indictment against the admin not for it.

    Some Deboner fans can't seem to separate the results from the process or admin from coaching staff.
    I get what you're saying, but putting the two side by side it was obvious Deboer better.

    It was fucking annoying reacting like scorned lovers over Campbell, when he wasn't it.
    I'm saying our process and administration sucks. It's literally been my same message forever and yet, some have trouble distinguishing that from hating the Deboner hire. At least they fired Jimmy I guess but it was obvious they hadn't done much thinking beyond that immediate need.

    I've been team LIPO for Deboner and still am until that defense does anything. It's a crapshoot indeed but there's still different shades of crap.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter