Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trying to decide how to feel.
Comments
-
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
points streak ends hereEwaDawg said:
Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.chuck said:
Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.
I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.
Rather easily, in fact.
Script, anyone? -
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
God, I hope so. What a worthless fucking stat.WilburHooksHands said:
points streak ends hereEwaDawg said:
Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.chuck said:
Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.
I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.
Rather easily, in fact.
Script, anyone? -
I see a 35-10 loss but the crowd gives a standing o as they keep Oregon out of the end zone to preserve the streak of no 40 point games. So mission accomplished there.
-
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.Canadawg said:
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
Yeah fair enough it's just funny to get that into the weeds when you could counter that with lots of other stuff that doesn't really matter like UW>Furd>Ducklawsandl said:
UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.Canadawg said:
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
I slept through the thirdGrundleStiltzkin said:I fell asleep before half. Woke up right around Furd kicking a FG to go ahead. Couldn’t stay awake for the heroic finish. Got up to take a piss just now & disappointed to see the big picture loss. Ts n Ps to the gamblers too.
-
Disagree. Oregon plays up or down to their competition.WilburHooksHands said:
points streak ends hereEwaDawg said:
Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.chuck said:
Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.
I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.
Rather easily, in fact.
Script, anyone? -
Rather easily.JoeEDangerously said:
Say 34-17.5?lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
-
A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
-
Sure.gifntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
We haven't won a one-score game against Oregon since the 80s. While Jimmy/DyMo have proven to be bizarrely above average in the game winning drives department, I suspect that's only because it's come against dogshit teams where we're able to lean on our significant talent advantage. There'll be no such advantage against Oregon. -
Oregon is a mediocre team where a few exceptional athletes make plays nobody else Can few times a game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
We can’t block. The end.
I am going with 35-10 ducks. Mario will be super complementary after the in the hopes that jimmy is never fired.
-
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
-
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt. -
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect. -
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye. -
You'll see Atom, you'll see. I agree it's not a trend, but it's about to become one.AtomicDawg said:
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye.
Morris will keep shitting his pants regardless, and I'm sure you notice and agree that some of Morris's sacks are self induced. -
Yes Morris will be the reason on many negative plays. But we aren’t blocking kayvon or Sewell when he blitzes.chuck said:
You'll see Atom, you'll see. I agree it's not a trend, but it's about to become one.AtomicDawg said:
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye.
Morris will keep shitting his pants regardless, and I'm sure you notice and agree that some of Morris's sacks are self induced.
One of Oregon’s biggest issues is their linebackers in coverage which will not exploit. Like at all. -
Yeah the duck game will test my theory for sure.AtomicDawg said:
Yes Morris will be the reason on many negative plays. But we aren’t blocking kayvon or Sewell when he blitzes.chuck said:
You'll see Atom, you'll see. I agree it's not a trend, but it's about to become one.AtomicDawg said:
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye.
Morris will keep shitting his pants regardless, and I'm sure you notice and agree that some of Morris's sacks are self induced.
One of Oregon’s biggest issues is their linebackers in coverage which will not exploit. Like at all. -
I would say UW should be able to run the ball consistently. I don’t get the blocking schemes at all. The running backs have no vision.chuck said:
You'll see Atom, you'll see. I agree it's not a trend, but it's about to become one.AtomicDawg said:
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye.
Morris will keep shitting his pants regardless, and I'm sure you notice and agree that some of Morris's sacks are self induced.
The OL should be able to get it done through. -
Oregon barely beat Cal and UCLA. They lost to Stanford. This won’t be a blow out. It will be a game in the 4th quarter.
-
There's still no cohesiveness or rhythm in the run game. Sometimes the backs just look blind and run into their own linemen. Often times, though, it's just bad timing. They're running at the purple shirt expecting it to clear out, and the linemen are getting these blocks more and more, but they hit too soon or the OL is a half step slow.lawsandl said:
I would say UW should be able to run the ball consistently. I don’t get the blocking schemes at all. The running backs have no vision.chuck said:
You'll see Atom, you'll see. I agree it's not a trend, but it's about to become one.AtomicDawg said:
4 sacks and 88 yards rushing vs Arizona.chuck said:
The OL has been making progress for three games now. It hasn't been a steady progression, but they are light years better now than in the first several games.AtomicDawg said:
Oregon kind of sucks at the skill positions. They block ppl though and will have their way with us.chuck said:
I've watched enough. Oregon has the horses on both sides to embarras UW. Morris will shit himself severely in this game and the defense won't have any answers against a diverse offense full of good athletes and a fast QB. Everything Oregon wants to do is going to work. I expect it to look like a Chip vs Sark game.ntxduck said:A lot of people in this thread Haven’t watched Oregon this year. Even if Oregon somehow gets up 24-3 it will be 27-24 with UW driving late to tie/win
Morris absolutely will shit the bed and we may get him injured as we don’t block and still haven’t figured out how to adjust to a blitzing linebacker or stunt.
The problem is that Morris panics whether he has a clean pocket or not. He'll run into pressure when all he has to do is slide or move up one step, and runs outside away from phantom pressure when the pocket is perfect.
0 sacks and 200 plus vs Stanford.
Both bottom of the barrel shit d1 defenses. This is not a trend yet. They were horrible vs UCLA too. They’re bad. Can confirm.
83 yards rushing
2 sacks and 7 tfl’s. After a bye.
Morris will keep shitting his pants regardless, and I'm sure you notice and agree that some of Morris's sacks are self induced.
The OL should be able to get it done through.
This is the shit I've been hammering on that shows a team that did not come out of camp ready to play. They're getting at least incrementally better simply by playing through their fuckups and learning from them. -
Oregon shook up their OL the last two games and we’ve seen the offense take off. Devon Williams emerged too. Brown looks much more comfortable. Cardwell at RB will add another dimension.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon barely beat Cal and UCLA. They lost to Stanford. This won’t be a blow out. It will be a game in the 4th quarter.
-
Let's see... ready to rumble OL...speed, speed, speed... you'll see a much different Brown than at the Furd game... ooo, even "will add another dimension" verbatim!lawsandl said:
Oregon shook up their OL the last two games and we’ve seen the offense take off. Devon Williams emerged too. Brown looks much more comfortable. Cardwell at RB will add another dimension.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon barely beat Cal and UCLA. They lost to Stanford. This won’t be a blow out. It will be a game in the 4th quarter.
All you're missing is controlling time of possession, and I'd say Oregon is set to win rather easily. Say, 34-17? -
Oregon *should win rather easily. I think they have another pants shitting in them before the seasons over, I just hope it's this Saturday. Like Roady said, it will come down to the 4th qtr and we will find a way to choke. Oregon 31 Doogs 21
-
And conversely UW’s only blow out loss was Michigan 2nd game of the season. UW is 4-2 since then, has a little momentum and is playing at home. For all the rumors on the boreds the last few weeks it’s clear that Jimmy has not lost the team. UW’s defense is good enough to keep it close. I see them staying in touching distance for most of the game before ultimately losing by 7-10.RoadDawg55 said:Oregon barely beat Cal and UCLA. They lost to Stanford. This won’t be a blow out. It will be a game in the 4th quarter.
