Another Stellar Incoming OLine Class
Comments
-
Good one. I didn't melt down. Just called you out for your shit that, "Wilcox had the worst defenses in the Pac 12." Are we Kim now and we just make shit up? It's fine that you don't think Wilcox is all that. All I have said is that he has proven to be a good DC so far (which he has). I don't want him as our next coach, never made a single post saying I did, but keep pretending I did.He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
I call it how I see it. I don't really give a fuck about trying to fit in. I agree with the majority of the board that Sark is a medicore coach. I agree that the program does not truly strive for greatness, the athletic department blows, dawgman and their posters are mostly morons, and the program's expectations are too low. Sorry I don't share your opinion on Wilcox and when I make shit up, feel free to call me out on it like I did with you. -
I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival. -
Gary Patterson ceiling isn't 7-6, that was his rock bottom. I'd love to have Gary Patterson here. He's actually won a Rose Bowl(then popped off) plus several other big games.IrishDawg22 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
Patterson is a the answer but goes 7-6 in his first season in a REAL conference. Hey, I thought 7-6 was not good enough. -
I said he improved from year one to year 2 and they fell off without him. Tennessee lost Wilcox and they gave up almost 12 more points per game and over 130 yards more without him. He was doing something right there. Only after you getting butthurt about saying he had the worst d in the SEC did I even comment on 2009 vs 2010 and provided some context. Earlier I said he did a good, but not great job at Tennessee.He_Needs_More_Time said:I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival.
-
Based on Yr 1 in a major conf.,He_Needs_More_Time said:
Gary Patterson ceiling isn't 7-6, that was his rock bottom. I'd love to have Gary Patterson here. He's actually won a Rose Bowl(then popped off) plus several other big games.IrishDawg22 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
Patterson is a the answer but goes 7-6 in his first season in a REAL conference. Hey, I thought 7-6 was not good enough.
Wilcox = amazing DC??? Can you show where someone actually said that or are you just pulling shit of your ass again?He_Needs_More_Time said:I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival.
With that wide gap can you even hear your farts???
-
We've had many debates with heretobeatmychest/road dawg about Wilcox it's not just this one.IrishDawg22 said:
Based on Yr 1 in a major conf.,He_Needs_More_Time said:
Gary Patterson ceiling isn't 7-6, that was his rock bottom. I'd love to have Gary Patterson here. He's actually won a Rose Bowl(then popped off) plus several other big games.IrishDawg22 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
Patterson is a the answer but goes 7-6 in his first season in a REAL conference. Hey, I thought 7-6 was not good enough.
Wilcox = amazing DC??? Can you show where someone actually said that or are you just pulling shit of your ass again?He_Needs_More_Time said:I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival.
With that wide gap can you even hear your farts???
They think he's good enough to be considered a head coach.
While most of us don't agree. -
Why is another two OLmen class not surprising for Sarkisian's recruiting logicality? Think about it Dawgfans. At a UW that once prided itself on never giving up the line-of-scrimmage without a brawl, we now have a coaching staff in it's fifth season that will go against BSU on Aug.31with five starting OL kids who as fourth year Huskies haven't yet proved they know what a brawl is........ probably because they have nobody with whom to brawl in practice. Perhaps the no-huddle hurry-up offense will turn the trick that the absence of a proven OL has been unable to.bananasnblondes said:Sark met his quota again by getting 2 offensive linemen
1) Dane Crane - Center - Supposed to be really good
2) Andrew Kirkland - Guard - General consensus is he will have to get A LOT better to contribute to a D-1 team
The last minute, garbage time, desperation offer guy (OT Coleman Shelton) is not on the incoming roster
Lather, Rinse, Repeat
-
I've never once said that and I have posts from today saying I want Mora or Petrino. Patterson would be great as well. DeRuyter is a guy to keep an eye on. I have a post from earlier today that says even the best coordinators are iffy hires and we need a proven guy.He_Needs_More_Time said:
We've had many debates with heretobeatmychest/road dawg about Wilcox it's not just this one.IrishDawg22 said:
Based on Yr 1 in a major conf.,He_Needs_More_Time said:
Gary Patterson ceiling isn't 7-6, that was his rock bottom. I'd love to have Gary Patterson here. He's actually won a Rose Bowl(then popped off) plus several other big games.IrishDawg22 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
Patterson is a the answer but goes 7-6 in his first season in a REAL conference. Hey, I thought 7-6 was not good enough.
Wilcox = amazing DC??? Can you show where someone actually said that or are you just pulling shit of your ass again?He_Needs_More_Time said:I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival.
With that wide gap can you even hear your farts???
They think he's good enough to be considered a head coach.
While most of us don't agree.
Most of the time, I agree with you regarding Husky Football. Just stop making shit up.
-
I know someone has all the screenshots that they need of Kim saying you need to sign 10 OL for every two years. Something that Sark has yet to do.Tailgater said:
Why is another two OLmen class not surprising for Sarkisian's recruiting logicality? Think about it Dawgfans. At a UW that once prided itself on never giving up the line-of-scrimmage without a brawl, we now have a coaching staff in it's fifth season that will go against BSU on Aug.31with five starting OL kids who as fourth year Huskies haven't yet proved they know what a brawl is........ probably because they have nobody with whom to brawl in practice. Perhaps the no-huddle hurry-up offense will turn the trick that the absence of a proven OL has been unable to.bananasnblondes said:Sark met his quota again by getting 2 offensive linemen
1) Dane Crane - Center - Supposed to be really good
2) Andrew Kirkland - Guard - General consensus is he will have to get A LOT better to contribute to a D-1 team
The last minute, garbage time, desperation offer guy (OT Coleman Shelton) is not on the incoming roster
Lather, Rinse, Repeat -
Harv loves Time's gaping asshole.IrishDawg22 said:
Based on Yr 1 in a major conf.,He_Needs_More_Time said:
Gary Patterson ceiling isn't 7-6, that was his rock bottom. I'd love to have Gary Patterson here. He's actually won a Rose Bowl(then popped off) plus several other big games.IrishDawg22 said:He_Needs_More_Time said:You guys melted down when I called out Wilcox like doogs do when they call out Sark.
Thanks for showing us that you guys are doogs just trying to fit in.
Patterson is a the answer but goes 7-6 in his first season in a REAL conference. Hey, I thought 7-6 was not good enough.
Wilcox = amazing DC??? Can you show where someone actually said that or are you just pulling shit of your ass again?He_Needs_More_Time said:I also never said Wilcox is a bad DC. Just stated he's not this amazing DC like you all claim. Then I brought up his stats at Tennessee and debunked the myth you guys were spreading how he improved their defense.
In his two years they never reached the level that was displayed the year prior to his arrival.
With that wide gap can you even hear your farts???
-
RD55 and HNMT sound like they need to get a room, with some citrus.
-
they certainly having raging hard-ons for each other.Swaye said:RD55 and HNMT sound like they need to get a room, with some citrus.
-
NTTAWWTDerekJohnson said:
they certainly having raging hard-ons for each other.Swaye said:RD55 and HNMT sound like they need to get a room, with some citrus.
-
So what do you guys think of Wilcox?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
