Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

BREAKING: Eldridge Recasner *gets it*

«134

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    If the little guy can’t pay, I believe he should lose the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money for.

    Period.
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 18,029

    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay, I believe he should lose the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money for.

    Period.

    They can pay when the government doesn't forbid them from collecting rent for 17 months and counting. Depriving people of the income stream and then saying "tough shit, fork over the title" is beyond fucked.
    All while extorting taxes at the muzzle of a gun.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    Looks like I was right. As I said MONTHS ago that many lenders will not tack missed payments onto the end of the loan if not owner occupied.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay, I believe he should lose the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money for.

    Period.

    Wow. That's Deep.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,034 Standard Supporter
    Kaepsknee said:

    Looks like I was right. As I said MONTHS ago that many lenders will not tack missed payments onto the end of the loan if not owner occupied.

    It will be litigated, although it shouldn't be. The Dems could fix it all with legislation many R's would sign off on in a heartbeat. But they won't.

    Because Wall Street owns the Democratic Party outright.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,146 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay the rent, I believe he should lose the right to the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money signed up for.

    Period.

    Fag.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay, I believe he should lose the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money for.

    Period.

    Wow. That's Deep.
    Simple truth.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay the rent, I believe he should lose the right to the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money signed up for.

    Period.

    Agree.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 6,997
    dnc said:
    I live in a resort area. When the no-eviction thing happened people actually tried to rent homes here at the beach and get the free rent. It didn't work. They were quickly shown the door. Clever enough to try and scam beach rental owners but too lazy to get a job.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 6,997
    doogie said:

    If the little guy can’t pay, I believe he should lose the property he/she/they/them/Zi/Xi/etc. borrowed money for.

    Period.

    So the government made them lose the property and you think that is just and fair?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited August 2021
    No.

    I am against paying people to stay home and I am against rent and mortgage eviction moratoriums.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    @dnc a q?

    Can you tell me how many Americans live in rental properties and how many mom and pop single property, reliant on that income, owners there are?

    That’s why you can have one without the other. It’s 100 million to maybe 3 million. As much as I’m not a fan of landlords, I don’t want those 3 million to suffer. Thankfully, there have been ways, and there continues to be ways, for them to get help.

    Make sure you don’t think things are unfair because you identify more with the group getting less help. It’s about harm reduction, that’s all we want.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    13. The Average Landlord Has Three Properties



    Great link. Yes, I think we should be willing to protect 100 million Americans from living on the street over the average landlord that owns three properties. (probably not counting the fourth where they live)

    You can call whatever you want mom and pop. I’d consider it someone that owns one rental property and relies on it for income. Maybe owns two in certain circumstances. Simply diy landlords pull in $300 billion in rent. “Mom and Pop” my ass.

    Do I even need to quote the point where their average income is 50% higher than the average American?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I don’t cherry pick anything.

    There’s 8 million independent landlords. They own 24 million properties. They collect 300 billion in rent. Half of them depend on that income. There’s even cited sources in your link confirming these facts. I’m not going to not help 100 million Americans because there’s slightly less help for 4 million Americans.

    I will concede that my first 3 million number was off and it’s 4 million, confirmed by your link. It was a pretty good ballpark since I didn’t have the actual numbers until you decided to get run over.

    I’m sorry if this personally effects you. I remember business was booming after 2008 but maybe you should have saved a little bit more so you could handle the ups and downs of putting people on the street for income. If you need anything to help hold you over let me know, pretty much the only thing I’ve done with my money for the last year is loan it to boomers.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965
    Unemployment has been there a year and a half why can't they pay their rent?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    13. The Average Landlord Has Three Properties



    Great link. Yes, I think we should be willing to protect 100 million Americans from living on the street over the average landlord that owns three properties. (probably not counting the fourth where they live)

    You can call whatever you want mom and pop. I’d consider it someone that owns one rental property and relies on it for income. Maybe owns two in certain circumstances. Simply diy landlords pull in $300 billion in rent. “Mom and Pop” my ass.

    Do I even need to quote the point where their average income is 50% higher than the average American?

    Now do grocery stores.

    You’re an absolute dumbfuck and a communist. Full stop. As Gavin Newsome likes to say.
    Decommodify food too.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    13. The Average Landlord Has Three Properties



    Great link. Yes, I think we should be willing to protect 100 million Americans from living on the street over the average landlord that owns three properties. (probably not counting the fourth where they live)

    You can call whatever you want mom and pop. I’d consider it someone that owns one rental property and relies on it for income. Maybe owns two in certain circumstances. Simply diy landlords pull in $300 billion in rent. “Mom and Pop” my ass.

    Do I even need to quote the point where their average income is 50% higher than the average American?

    100 million now.

    And people thought I was crazy.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 6,997
    Swaye said:

    13. The Average Landlord Has Three Properties



    Great link. Yes, I think we should be willing to protect 100 million Americans from living on the street over the average landlord that owns three properties. (probably not counting the fourth where they live)

    You can call whatever you want mom and pop. I’d consider it someone that owns one rental property and relies on it for income. Maybe owns two in certain circumstances. Simply diy landlords pull in $300 billion in rent. “Mom and Pop” my ass.

    Do I even need to quote the point where their average income is 50% higher than the average American?

    Now do grocery stores.

    You’re an absolute dumbfuck and a communist. Full stop. As Gavin Newsome likes to say.
    Decommodify food too.
    You can't be serious?

    Also, while I agree putting loads of people on the street sucks, why do they have more right to a property than the person who owns the property? It's a simple question. What's your solution to make the OWNERS of the property whole? Also, have you offered up your spare bedroom to a homeless person yet? What are you personally sacrificing, of YOUR OWN comfort, to fix this problem? My strong suspicion is nothing, because like most socialist dreamers it's always better when someone else's hard work and sacrifice is taken from them, to help you or your high minded ideals.
    History teaches socialists nothing. kobe thinks if you own property the government should be able to take it over whenever it wants and drive families into bankruptcy. Some things never change with the ignorant. No investment property means there is nowhere for those people to live.

    Its too deep for kobe to understand.

    Here where I live there are many people who depend on rental income to support their retirement. Rental income is fleeting at best. Long period of inoccupancy can ruin the entire year. It is hit or miss every other year.