Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

The sobering reality

124

Comments

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827

    Critical Race Theory??
    potm
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827

    Critical Race Theory??
    This is so good, I'm fucking dying over here




  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 27,084 Swaye's Wigwam

    Nybe
    I blame happy hour
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,901

    Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.

    Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
    Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,901

    A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.

    They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
    Your best teams lost to Stanford.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Kaepsknee said:

    Your best teams lost to Stanford.
    The best team of that run, that he keeps mentioning, beat Stanford rather easily...say 44-6. Remember that team? 70-21 ring a bell?

    An injury decimated squad lost to Stanford the next year (the one that beat the fighting taggerts 38-3).

    Don't be a retard. Troll better.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Kaepsknee said:

    Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?
    Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,901
    chuck said:

    Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...
    None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.

    Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.

    But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Kaepsknee said:

    None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.

    Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.

    But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
    Those defenses were good against the run too, When they struggled it was against power running teams and play action.

    Read my other response. I'm well aware of how his offenses worked and how hard it was to contain them for a full game. I also know how often teams that were containing them buckled after giving up a crucial big play, and how good the ducks were at seizing that momentum. Petersen's teams were crazy good at not giving up those big plays
  • QuietcowskeeQuietcowskee Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,133 Swaye's Wigwam
    Kaepsknee said:

    None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.

    Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.

    But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
    Vita Vea (at DE), Greg Gaines, Elijah Qualls, JoJo Mathis.

    Not strong against the run? G.T.F.O.H Dixon’sKnee.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,181 Swaye's Wigwam
    Or Burrkirven and Trapp
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,901

    Vita Vea (at DE), Greg Gaines, Elijah Qualls, JoJo Mathis.

    Not strong against the run? G.T.F.O.H Dixon’sKnee.
    You had some studs on the DL as well. And they faced Chip Kelly style offenses, as many teams copied what Oregon was doing. However the copies were never as good as the original.

    We’ll never know.
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,541 Founders Club

    A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.

    They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
    The 2016 team had the front w/ Vita, Greg and Qualls to stop the hand off to the rb on the read zone which was Chip's teams achilles when they lost (LSU, Auburn, Ohio State), so as long as our ends didn't crash to stop it and trusted Big Daddy G and Vita to do their job (which they would have) our Defense would have been more able to keep it close.

    The other thing Chip's offense was great at was running those two plays so successfully that the DB's/safeties would start to peak/run in to help w/ run support, and then fake the hand off and hit a wr that was 10 yards behind everyone.

    I would take my chances with the 2016 team Defense anytime.

  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    HuskyJW said:

    Petersen had the best run in the last 25-30 years for UW and still wasn’t enough.

    What if Petersen was actually the best coach in all of CFB, and therefore has shown us the best any head coach could ever achieve at Washington? That would suck.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam

    WR screens didn’t work on us either, mainly because of Budda.
    His speed getting to those was a difference maker for sure. The corners were good at containing that play too though.

    That defense had everything except high quality depth.
  • HairyBallsDawgHairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,074


    Here’s the table since the invention of football, but he’ll let you go back to 1869 for some reason. Really puts things in perspective. For all the sadness in this thread you’d think this was HardcoreHokie.



    Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.
  • RatherBeBrewingRatherBeBrewing Member Posts: 1,557

    Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.
    Brothers Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt invented football in 1994, changing it from a more rugby-like game dependent on scrums to the football we know and lovehate today by introducing the forward pass.


    Caption: Teddy Roosevelt pets his older brother, former president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, while (l-r) Kenny Wheaton, Phil Knight, and Walt Disney congratulate him on inventing football. October 1994. Picture courtesy of the UOSJC archives. Fun historical fact: The American public did not know that FDR was a duck due to complications from playing too much polo. The media helped hide this in order to not hurt morale during the Boer War.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2021

    Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.
    Are you new?
Sign In or Register to comment.