The sobering reality
Comments
-
potmQuietcowskee said:
Critical Race Theory??Canadawg said:Race was probably the guy in the mid 2000s screaming that USC and Florida were going to rule forever
-
This is so good, I'm fucking dying over hereQuietcowskee said:
Critical Race Theory??Canadawg said:Race was probably the guy in the mid 2000s screaming that USC and Florida were going to rule forever
-
I blame happy hourRaceBannon said:
NybePostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW fucking sucked for 15 years. Like the worst P5 programs for 7 of them.RaceBannon said:
Hes a doog, doogPostGameOrangeSlices said:@Canadawg clapping boomer cheeks in this thread. LOL
WE'RE ONLY 20 POINTS BEHIND OSU WHO JUST RAPED US
WOOOF
WHY ARENT WE AS GOOD AS BAMA AND OHIO STATE?!?!?!?!?! WHERE IS JIM OWENS WHEN YA NEED HIM?!?!?!?!?!?
DOOG -
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for. -
Your best teams lost to Stanford.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field. -
The best team of that run, that he keeps mentioning, beat Stanford rather easily...say 44-6. Remember that team? 70-21 ring a bell?Kaepsknee said:
Your best teams lost to Stanford.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
An injury decimated squad lost to Stanford the next year (the one that beat the fighting taggerts 38-3).
Don't be a retard. Troll better. -
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for. -
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year. -
Those defenses were good against the run too, When they struggled it was against power running teams and play action.Kaepsknee said:
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
Read my other response. I'm well aware of how his offenses worked and how hard it was to contain them for a full game. I also know how often teams that were containing them buckled after giving up a crucial big play, and how good the ducks were at seizing that momentum. Petersen's teams were crazy good at not giving up those big plays -
Vita Vea (at DE), Greg Gaines, Elijah Qualls, JoJo Mathis.Kaepsknee said:
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
Not strong against the run? G.T.F.O.H Dixon’sKnee.
