The sobering reality
Comments
-
potmQuietcowskee said:
Critical Race Theory??Canadawg said:Race was probably the guy in the mid 2000s screaming that USC and Florida were going to rule forever
-
This is so good, I'm fucking dying over hereQuietcowskee said:
Critical Race Theory??Canadawg said:Race was probably the guy in the mid 2000s screaming that USC and Florida were going to rule forever
-
I blame happy hourRaceBannon said:
NybePostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW fucking sucked for 15 years. Like the worst P5 programs for 7 of them.RaceBannon said:
Hes a doog, doogPostGameOrangeSlices said:@Canadawg clapping boomer cheeks in this thread. LOL
WE'RE ONLY 20 POINTS BEHIND OSU WHO JUST RAPED US
WOOOF
WHY ARENT WE AS GOOD AS BAMA AND OHIO STATE?!?!?!?!?! WHERE IS JIM OWENS WHEN YA NEED HIM?!?!?!?!?!?
DOOG -
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for. -
Your best teams lost to Stanford.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field. -
The best team of that run, that he keeps mentioning, beat Stanford rather easily...say 44-6. Remember that team? 70-21 ring a bell?Kaepsknee said:
Your best teams lost to Stanford.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
An injury decimated squad lost to Stanford the next year (the one that beat the fighting taggerts 38-3).
Don't be a retard. Troll better. -
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for. -
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year. -
Those defenses were good against the run too, When they struggled it was against power running teams and play action.Kaepsknee said:
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
Read my other response. I'm well aware of how his offenses worked and how hard it was to contain them for a full game. I also know how often teams that were containing them buckled after giving up a crucial big play, and how good the ducks were at seizing that momentum. Petersen's teams were crazy good at not giving up those big plays -
Vita Vea (at DE), Greg Gaines, Elijah Qualls, JoJo Mathis.Kaepsknee said:
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
Not strong against the run? G.T.F.O.H Dixon’sKnee.
-
Or Burrkirven and Trapp
-
You had some studs on the DL as well. And they faced Chip Kelly style offenses, as many teams copied what Oregon was doing. However the copies were never as good as the original.Quietcowskee said:
Vita Vea (at DE), Greg Gaines, Elijah Qualls, JoJo Mathis.Kaepsknee said:
None of Chips teams were pass first. And that was the strength of Pete defenses.chuck said:
Chip's offense still would have scored, but Kawasaki's defense would have been a lot more effective against it than most. Any UW defense between 2015 and 2019 would have given the offense to chance to hang with any of his Oregon teams. Not sure the offense would have, but...Kaepsknee said:
Which Chip Kelly led squad would the 2016 Huskies beat?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
Chips teams snapped the ball every 13 seconds with the same personnel on the field for a whole drive many times. No substitutions for either side. Almost all defenses buckled eventually.
But the reality is that we will never know of course. Chips best team was the year after He left. And that was Pete’s first year.
Not strong against the run? G.T.F.O.H Dixon’sKnee.
We’ll never know. -
The 2016 team had the front w/ Vita, Greg and Qualls to stop the hand off to the rb on the read zone which was Chip's teams achilles when they lost (LSU, Auburn, Ohio State), so as long as our ends didn't crash to stop it and trusted Big Daddy G and Vita to do their job (which they would have) our Defense would have been more able to keep it close.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
The other thing Chip's offense was great at was running those two plays so successfully that the DB's/safeties would start to peak/run in to help w/ run support, and then fake the hand off and hit a wr that was 10 yards behind everyone.
I would take my chances with the 2016 team Defense anytime.
-
What if Petersen was actually the best coach in all of CFB, and therefore has shown us the best any head coach could ever achieve at Washington? That would suck.HuskyJW said:
Petersen had the best run in the last 25-30 years for UW and still wasn’t enough.RaceBannon said:The coaching search has been one of the few bright spots of this century of Husky football. It's kept things afloat in a lazy rhythm of - shitty hire, can't wait to fire, and another shitty hire.
Neuheisel was an inspired hire in 98 despite the end. Won our? last Rose Bowl and got the TBS crowd fired up and landed Paul Arnold and Reggie Williams
Gilby and Ty were HORRIBLE hires. Sark was unknown as a head coach so he had that going for him which was nice. He would not have been fired anytime soon
Petersen was a great hire graded on the curve of the talent pool that the AD uses. 3 out of his 6 years were better than most. TBS guys love him although getting his guys in here didn't do much other than 8-5.
He quits and the AD makes the easy hire of Jimmy and the world comes to a halt.
At this time the entire Pac 12 decides to give up football and the sharks at the SEC and the ACC and Ohio State see the blood in the waters. The top two California quarterbacks were already at Clemson and Bama.
So we lose Emeka and JTT to Ohio State not Oregon or Stanford or USC. Other than enjoying the company here in Misery this is not good for the West Coast.
I love to fire the coach as much as the next guy but the same people still hire the next one and the folks doing the hiring don't get fired.
Jimmy could have done some things differently and had a better shot. Ryan Day clearly has something going on. As do schools serious about football.
At this point I think Husky Football is as fucked as it has ever been because I don't see a way out. 7-5 with the occasional 10-2 is our lot in life. Build the statue of Jimmy
30 years from now we can reminisce about the first round play off losses.
It's not one recruit and it's not one year. It's the last 30 years. -
WR screens didn’t work on us either, mainly because of Budda.godawgst said:
The 2016 team had the front w/ Vita, Greg and Qualls to stop the hand off to the rb on the read zone which was Chip's teams achilles when they lost (LSU, Auburn, Ohio State), so as long as our ends didn't crash to stop it and trusted Big Daddy G and Vita to do their job (which they would have) our Defense would have been more able to keep it close.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
The other thing Chip's offense was great at was running those two plays so successfully that the DB's/safeties would start to peak/run in to help w/ run support, and then fake the hand off and hit a wr that was 10 yards behind everyone.
I would take my chances with the 2016 team Defense anytime. -
His speed getting to those was a difference maker for sure. The corners were good at containing that play too though.RoadDawg55 said:
WR screens didn’t work on us either, mainly because of Budda.godawgst said:
The 2016 team had the front w/ Vita, Greg and Qualls to stop the hand off to the rb on the read zone which was Chip's teams achilles when they lost (LSU, Auburn, Ohio State), so as long as our ends didn't crash to stop it and trusted Big Daddy G and Vita to do their job (which they would have) our Defense would have been more able to keep it close.RoadDawg55 said:
A few of those Oregon teams lost to Stanford. They always had trouble when they couldn’t gash you on the ground with tempo.chuck said:
The 2017 team too, up until injuries and opt outs revealed the lack of depth.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. They weren’t all better than 2016 UW.Kaepsknee said:
I said when He was hired at UCLA that Chip Kelly would suck there. @RaceBannon remembers.RoadDawg55 said:
Petersen as an organizer and leader is substantially better than Chip. People actually like Petersen.haie said:The situation isn't what it should be but with how much CFB is changing a 5-6 window is most relevant, and we are basically Northwestern/MSU/Wisconsin during that time. We need to be able to compete with tOSU in recruiting, and we aren't. It needs to get fixed.
Not ideal, but the "it's dead" stuff is hyperbolic.
The main thing that has let everyone down is the coach who began building and then quit abruptly. And that's not on UW, that's on him, and the unspoken thing is that like Chip, he's just not a good coach once defenses figure out his offense.
Like has been hinted here, the defense is great and innovative (susceptible to certain positions bottoming out, yes) and Lake was the man behind that, which is why that decision was made in 2019. Along with the elevated DB recruiting since 2014
Chip’s innovating days are over and he now sucks.
Chips Oregon teams however were all Better than any of Pete’s teams. And it wasn’t close.
Mariota would have made it tough, but our defense was much better than Chip’s defenses, which were mostly underrated defenses and better than they got credit for.
I can't say which of the Chip teams they would be better than. A couple were obviously way beyond reach.
They were very, very good, but 2016 UW is beating at least a few of them. A lot of it would just depend on the day, the momentum, and home field.
The other thing Chip's offense was great at was running those two plays so successfully that the DB's/safeties would start to peak/run in to help w/ run support, and then fake the hand off and hit a wr that was 10 yards behind everyone.
I would take my chances with the 2016 team Defense anytime.
That defense had everything except high quality depth. -
Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.RatherBeBrewing said:dnc said:
Here’s the table since the invention of football, but he’ll let you go back to 1869 for some reason. Really puts things in perspective. For all the sadness in this thread you’d think this was HardcoreHokie.
-
Brothers Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt invented football in 1994, changing it from a more rugby-like game dependent on scrums to the football we know and lovehate today by introducing the forward pass.HairyBallsDawg said:
Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.RatherBeBrewing said:dnc said:
Here’s the table since the invention of football, but he’ll let you go back to 1869 for some reason. Really puts things in perspective. For all the sadness in this thread you’d think this was HardcoreHokie.
Caption: Teddy Roosevelt pets his older brother, former president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, while (l-r) Kenny Wheaton, Phil Knight, and Walt Disney congratulate him on inventing football. October 1994. Picture courtesy of the UOSJC archives. Fun historical fact: The American public did not know that FDR was a duck due to complications from playing too much polo. The media helped hide this in order to not hurt morale during the Boer War. -
FREE PUB!!! Also the name of my new website.Sancho said:The sobering reality is there is no home for a moderate doog who wants to criticize his team and rant now and then.
Dawgman is full of beta cunts who bow down to nacho lovers. You miserable cunts just want to sit in the dark at anf cut yourselves. And stare at cooze in the Wam that old farts can't pull anymore.
-
Are you new?HairyBallsDawg said:
Claiming that football was invented in 1994 -- which is the year Justin Bieber was born -- if fucktarted -- but what else can be expected of quacks.RatherBeBrewing said:dnc said:
Here’s the table since the invention of football, but he’ll let you go back to 1869 for some reason. Really puts things in perspective. For all the sadness in this thread you’d think this was HardcoreHokie. -
Roadie with the ballad....RoadDawg55 said:
No. That DL, Sirmon, and the safeties weren’t good enough. We were lucky to beat Utah.GrundleStiltzkin said:Imagine, if you can, the winning % if we° were a serious program that played a season last year. Might have jumped a spot.
With a freshman QB and a somewhat shitty defense, we were a year away. This year with improvement, my doog heart thinks we will be good.
-
By the time the book came out, would anybody still care?YellowSnow said:
I think @DerekJohnson ’s next book should on social Darwinism in college football. Devote a chapter to each pivotal moment where the strong got stronger and the weak got weaker.GreenRiverGatorz said:The history books are littered with the carcasses of the losers who couldn't keep up with the turning of the page. Be it the Neanderthals who went extinct in favor of the dominant homo sapiens, the Mayans and countless other indigenous cultures who fell to our forefathers and their imperialist victories, or west coast football and the now eternal dad-dicking at the hands of the Midwest and southeast. It's all the same. We're the losers. Don't fight it, just welcome the sweet embrace of inevitability. Go Dawgs. Go Mariners. Go fuck yourselves.
-
I actually think this is the true outcome.Fenderbender123 said:
What if Petersen was actually the best coach in all of CFB, and therefore has shown us the best any head coach could ever achieve at Washington? That would suck.HuskyJW said:
Petersen had the best run in the last 25-30 years for UW and still wasn’t enough.RaceBannon said:The coaching search has been one of the few bright spots of this century of Husky football. It's kept things afloat in a lazy rhythm of - shitty hire, can't wait to fire, and another shitty hire.
Neuheisel was an inspired hire in 98 despite the end. Won our? last Rose Bowl and got the TBS crowd fired up and landed Paul Arnold and Reggie Williams
Gilby and Ty were HORRIBLE hires. Sark was unknown as a head coach so he had that going for him which was nice. He would not have been fired anytime soon
Petersen was a great hire graded on the curve of the talent pool that the AD uses. 3 out of his 6 years were better than most. TBS guys love him although getting his guys in here didn't do much other than 8-5.
He quits and the AD makes the easy hire of Jimmy and the world comes to a halt.
At this time the entire Pac 12 decides to give up football and the sharks at the SEC and the ACC and Ohio State see the blood in the waters. The top two California quarterbacks were already at Clemson and Bama.
So we lose Emeka and JTT to Ohio State not Oregon or Stanford or USC. Other than enjoying the company here in Misery this is not good for the West Coast.
I love to fire the coach as much as the next guy but the same people still hire the next one and the folks doing the hiring don't get fired.
Jimmy could have done some things differently and had a better shot. Ryan Day clearly has something going on. As do schools serious about football.
At this point I think Husky Football is as fucked as it has ever been because I don't see a way out. 7-5 with the occasional 10-2 is our lot in life. Build the statue of Jimmy
30 years from now we can reminisce about the first round play off losses.
It's not one recruit and it's not one year. It's the last 30 years.
