New Peer reviewed study: Masks provide zero benefit, may cause premature death
Comments
-
Its amazing that you're pathetic enough to admit thatHairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
But thanks -
Even a broken clock is right 2x a day ... and even an idiot is right from time to time.HairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
Blindly assuming that something someone says or thinks is wrong because you don't like them is the definition of fucktarded
As always, take evidence, think critically, form your own opinions.
Why do so many people require other people to think for them? -
That’s a great post by me. The complete lack of sense of humor on the right is your own problem.
Plenty of studies have shown masks work. The one that’s been debunked for lying about masks poisoning you and rambles on about how dehumanizing it is, doesn’t deserve a serious response. -
Seriously?TheKobeStopper said:That’s a great post by me. The complete lack of sense of humor on the right is your own problem.
Plenty of studies have shown masks work. The one that’s been debunked for lying about masks poisoning you and rambles on about how dehumanizing it is, doesn’t deserve a serious response. -
Johnny come lately comes out for masks because tRUmP iS AgAInsT ThEmHairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks. -
Which isn't what I wrote... try harder.Tequilla said:HairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
Blindly assuming that something someone says or thinks is wrong because you don't like them is the definition of fucktarded
Different scientists don't agree.
But if Trump is against them (and his dick suckers here)... then for now... I'm for them.
I realize the above concepts might be challenging to the typical Trump fan, but try hard to rise above the rest of your ilk. -
Biden is president nowHairyBallsDawg said:
Which isn't what I wrote... try harder.Tequilla said:HairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
Blindly assuming that something someone says or thinks is wrong because you don't like them is the definition of fucktarded
Different scientists don't agree.
But if Trump is against them (and his dick suckers here)... then for now... I'm for them.
I realize the above concepts might be challenging to the typical Trump fan, but try hard to rise above the rest of your ilk.
Thank a racist like yourself -
Indeed. Most thinking Americans are thankful every single day.RaceBannon said:
Biden is president nowHairyBallsDawg said:
Which isn't what I wrote... try harder.Tequilla said:HairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
Blindly assuming that something someone says or thinks is wrong because you don't like them is the definition of fucktarded
Different scientists don't agree.
But if Trump is against them (and his dick suckers here)... then for now... I'm for them.
I realize the above concepts might be challenging to the typical Trump fan, but try hard to rise above the rest of your ilk.
Trump was the worst president this nation has had in the last 100 years.
He even made W look smart -- which isn't easy.
-
I'm far from a Trump fan ... dude has some major flaws and issues ... also got some things right as well ... important to be fair and balancedHairyBallsDawg said:
Which isn't what I wrote... try harder.Tequilla said:HairyBallsDawg said:
I don't think this article means what you think it means.doogie said:@TheKobeStopper, @insinceredawg, @HHusky, @EwaDawg, @MelloDawg Can you refute this science? It seems to contradict Dr Fauci.
Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biotechnological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Also, scientists don't always agree, which is why the hash it out with studies. Some says masks are helpful, some say they are not.
Who knows.
At one point in time in the 20th century, nearly all scientists thought we'd never walk on the moon.
One thing is certain though. If a dumbfuck like Trump is against masks, and all of his dick suckers here are too... then for now... I'm for masks.
Blindly assuming that something someone says or thinks is wrong because you don't like them is the definition of fucktarded
Different scientists don't agree.
But if Trump is against them (and his dick suckers here)... then for now... I'm for them.
I realize the above concepts might be challenging to the typical Trump fan, but try hard to rise above the rest of your ilk.
I know you didn't write that ... but your implication is "do the opposite" of what someone (and others) you clearly disagree with on principal ... so now you know why I wrote what I wrote.
I've got no problem wearing my mask, being symbolic, etc.
Basic science leaves me dubious that they are the solution that some want you to believe that they are ...
I'll continue to adapt my life to avoiding unnecessary interactions until I'm at the point of being fully vaccinated
-
