Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Guilty all counts

24567

Comments

  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    I don't know what this 11 year old tweet (almost exactly to the day) has to do with anything, but I do know it's not a coincidence.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Exhume the 'body' of Corona Light and prove that he is dead.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    kangaroo court obviously
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    alumni94 said:

    Let's watch if the racist white people will riot and burn down stuff now.

    Yeah, the other side is a bunch of savages, huh?
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,584 Standard Supporter

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    regurgitating SJW talking point number 56 sans evidence. Good job comrade
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,169 Standard Supporter

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    So instead of everyone getting fair trials the cop should get an unfair trial because black people get unfair trials? How about you focus on black people getting fair trials rather than retribution?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    You mean the "evidence" that if you were asked to provide it you run and hide like a Kunt?
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Great reminder of the nearly unrestrained power of the state. Do this shit indoors and with the body cams off and nobody hears about it.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965 Standard Supporter
    The crazy part is he looks closer than the guy on trial does
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,169 Standard Supporter

    alumni94 said:

    Let's watch if the racist white people will riot and burn down stuff now.

    Yeah, the other side is a bunch of savages, huh?
    Why do you associate the word "savage" with "the other side" (code for black people).
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    alumni94 said:

    Let's watch if the racist white people will riot and burn down stuff now.

    Yeah, the other side is a bunch of savages, huh?
    That's what the Biden WH believes.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
    Yes. And I think the Democrats, including Joe, who couldn't hold their tongues before a verdict have helped to add to a narrative of unfairness that the RW was going to spout anyway, but there was no need to help them. Unforced error.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    edited April 2021
    They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
    Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.

    But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    alumni94 said:

    Let's watch if the racist white people will riot and burn down stuff now.

    Yeah, the other side is a bunch of savages, huh?
    Why do you associate the word "savage" with "the other side" (code for black people).
    Because he is a racist who doesn't believe that blacks are smart enough to acquire ID and that white people make blacks have kids out of wedlock.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,884
    jecornel said:

    They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.

    'cuz the evidence looked so good for the defense
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,844
    jecornel said:

    They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.

    Not sure you know that.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    So instead of everyone getting fair trials the cop should get an unfair trial because black people get unfair trials? How about you focus on black people getting fair trials rather than retribution?
    It’s not an unfair trial because you disagree with the verdict.

    There’s no retribution. There’s a 9 minute video of Chauvin killing George Floyd.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
    Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.

    But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
    Who are the people that reject the notion that black people don't get fair trials? Name, names Kunt. People of all races don't receive fair trials. Poor people often don't receive fair trials. Fuck off with you lying bullshit.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    @MelloDawg i was there in the room. I do know.
    MelloDawg said:

    jecornel said:

    They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.

    Not sure you know that.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    regurgitating SJW talking point number 56 sans evidence. Good job comrade
    TIL that statistical facts are “sjw talking points”.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Goduckies said:

    The crazy part is he looks closer than the guy on trial does
    Watch the video, look at the fake badge, and how he has his hands in his pockets while restraining an allegedly dangerous individual.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.

    The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
    Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
    Yes. And I think the Democrats, including Joe, who couldn't hold their tongues before a verdict have helped to add to a narrative of unfairness that the RW was going to spout anyway, but there was no need to help them. Unforced error.
    I actually agree with most of that. Those would-be trial meddlers should have kept their mouths shut.