Kobe Bitch
Absolutely NOTHING that you accuse me of is even remotely close to accurate
Comments
-
And BTW, your last point is the most flawed attempt at thought that you’ve made ...
How much of a pompous ass do you have to be to think that 45-50% of the country (conservatives) are just flat wrong and there are some decent ones that can admit that they are ...
Let me give you a life lesson here ... we’re all wrong ... and we’re all wrong OFTEN in life on a day by day basis. If you think you have all the answers and that you’re right on everything ... let’s just say life has a funny way of humbling those that get too far ahead of their skis. -
-
It's cold as fuck, then some years it's warm as fuck. 11 years ago, I was in New Orleans and was as freezing cold as I've ever been in my life. They got the same arctic blast this year....it happens.
So, yes, there is 'climate' change.
But somehow that's being a denier. And the statistical sampling window is one week now.
-
Cancel culture?
-
This seems like it applies.Tequilla said:And BTW, your last point is the most flawed attempt at thought that you’ve made ...
How much of a pompous ass do you have to be to think that 45-50% of the country (conservatives) are just flat wrong and there are some decent ones that can admit that they are ...
Let me give you a life lesson here ... we’re all wrong ... and we’re all wrong OFTEN in life on a day by day basis. If you think you have all the answers and that you’re right on everything ... let’s just say life has a funny way of humbling those that get too far ahead of their skis.
-
I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said? -
No ... it’s called I’m not that interested in getting into your twisted logic on TwitterTheKobeStopper said:Cancel culture?
-
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion -
I'm just glad you split up your postTequilla said:And BTW, your last point is the most flawed attempt at thought that you’ve made ...
How much of a pompous ass do you have to be to think that 45-50% of the country (conservatives) are just flat wrong and there are some decent ones that can admit that they are ...
Let me give you a life lesson here ... we’re all wrong ... and we’re all wrong OFTEN in life on a day by day basis. If you think you have all the answers and that you’re right on everything ... let’s just say life has a funny way of humbling those that get too far ahead of their skis. -
-
Main bored belongs
-
I actually chinned one of the @TheKobeStopper poasts - but that was only because @Tequilla blocked him on the twitters
-
I think it’s odd that you said you were being sarcastic but you then spent the next few sentences arguing for the exact point that you were saying sarcastically.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
You think cold weather disproves climate change.
You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
And the cold weather events to get addressed. Constantly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcdfw.com/lx/you-can-thank-climate-change-for-extreme-weather-patterns-wreaking-havoc-in-texas-and-across-the-u-s/2553835/?amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/cold-winter-global-warming-polar-vortex/a-56534450 -
It only became "climate change" when global warming didn't catch on.
-
You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
You need to see @IrishDawg22 again
And try to catch up. -
It's what his mommies told him.RaceBannon said:You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
You need to see @IrishDawg22 again
And try to catch up. -
Alternative facts don't care about your feelings.Tequilla said:If you’re going to try to come after me on Twitter ... get your fucking facts straight
Absolutely NOTHING that you accuse me of is even remotely close to accurate -
Again ... out of contextTheKobeStopper said:
I think it’s odd that you said you were being sarcastic but you then spent the next few sentences arguing for the exact point that you were saying sarcastically.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
You think cold weather disproves climate change.
You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
And the cold weather events to get addressed. Constantly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcdfw.com/lx/you-can-thank-climate-change-for-extreme-weather-patterns-wreaking-havoc-in-texas-and-across-the-u-s/2553835/?amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/cold-winter-global-warming-polar-vortex/a-56534450
Everything about more volatile extremes in climate makes complete sense to me. I have never been one to not only embrace the direction of clean/green energy but recognize that there are elements of climate change that is definitely more controllable than what we’ve historically done.
Where I pause with caution is making sure that as we transition we make sure we don’t let things slip through the cracks and go “oops” after the fact ... which is what is happening in Texas
And let’s be clear, what’s happening in Texas looks and feels like gross negligence in terms of protecting infrastructure in case of these types of events.
The reason I say I’m being sarcastic is because I’m not seeing the same level of vigilance about claiming this vortex is indicative proof of global warming as when warm weather events happen. I suspect that that’s because it’s easier to draw connections to warning to warming events. The reality is people need to understand it goes both ways ... which was really my point (likely poorly made)
I think this is a good example of how if you want to actually have a conversation ... have one and engage. But if your path is to take something out of context and put someone out on blast, that’s just the wrong way to go about doing things. -
Didn't read but fuck it I chinned anyway.Tequilla said:
Again ... out of contextTheKobeStopper said:
I think it’s odd that you said you were being sarcastic but you then spent the next few sentences arguing for the exact point that you were saying sarcastically.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
You think cold weather disproves climate change.
You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
And the cold weather events to get addressed. Constantly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcdfw.com/lx/you-can-thank-climate-change-for-extreme-weather-patterns-wreaking-havoc-in-texas-and-across-the-u-s/2553835/?amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/cold-winter-global-warming-polar-vortex/a-56534450
Everything about more volatile extremes in climate makes complete sense to me. I have never been one to not only embrace the direction of clean/green energy but recognize that there are elements of climate change that is definitely more controllable than what we’ve historically done.
Where I pause with caution is making sure that as we transition we make sure we don’t let things slip through the cracks and go “oops” after the fact ... which is what is happening in Texas
And let’s be clear, what’s happening in Texas looks and feels like gross negligence in terms of protecting infrastructure in case of these types of events.
The reason I say I’m being sarcastic is because I’m not seeing the same level of vigilance about claiming this vortex is indicative proof of global warming as when warm weather events happen. I suspect that that’s because it’s easier to draw connections to warning to warming events. The reality is people need to understand it goes both ways ... which was really my point (likely poorly made)
I think this is a good example of how if you want to actually have a conversation ... have one and engage. But if your path is to take something out of context and put someone out on blast, that’s just the wrong way to go about doing things.
-
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies -
There’s always been a lot of twisters in this community. I’m sorry it had to happen yesterday to you too.Tequilla said:And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
Don’t be a twister. -
Ps, next time the 100 year freak comes around, Houston will be underwater.
-
Just like it has been a few times in the last 10 yearsGrundleStiltzkin said:Ps, next time the 100 year freak comes around, Houston will be underwater.
-
Arguing with an fool until they drag you down to their level is a waste of tim.Tequilla said:And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I prefer to just skip right to it and call him a fool immediately.
Your apology is so Beta. Was it sarcasm? Why do you care what that dude thinks? It’s entertaining pushing these dunces away from reality.
Zero BidenBros to be found. -
Regardless of whether I agree with someone or not, calling them a bitch isn’t the path that I want to go down. Hence the apology.NorthwestFresh said:
Arguing with an fool until they drag you down to their level is a waste of tim.Tequilla said:And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I prefer to just skip right to it and call him a fool immediately.
Your apology is so Beta. Was it sarcasm? Why do you care what that dude thinks? It’s entertaining pushing these dunces away from reality.
Zero BidenBros to be found.
I can’t expect others to act in a more civilized manner if I don’t take my own advice right? And the least that I can do if I make a mistake is to own it. -
Is Kobe BBK? Doubtful.Blu82 said:
It's what his mommies told him.RaceBannon said:You don’t understand the difference between weather and climate.
You need to see @IrishDawg22 again
And try to catch up. -
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well. -
Yes, they changed it to climate change so what ever random event that has zero to do with carbon emissions can be blamed on it. Pure crap
-
I didn’t intentionally take it out of context. You must know the guys here would 100% make that argument. I went with it because it stood out to me, like god damn even Tequilla believes this shit. But I was wrong, so sorry I called you a dumb fuck.Tequilla said:And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I don’t really get the problem with taking things to another medium part but I won’t do it to you since you so strenuously object to it.
