Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This will become more common
Comments
-
sounds like there will be more people available to work in my yard and hang/remove Christmas lights for a reasonable fee. Marcos and his crew were getting pretty sloppy as it was, presumably because they were starting to see options to working for me. a little competition in the illegal labor market never hurts.MikeDamone said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
so where's the problem again? -
That would be illegal....creepycoug said:
sounds like there will be more people available to work in my yard and hang/remove Christmas lights for a reasonable fee. Marcos and his crew were getting pretty sloppy as it was, presumably because they were starting to see options to working for me. a little competition in the illegal labor market never hurts.MikeDamone said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
so where's the problem again? -
remember Mike, it's not illegal if you don't think it is. reference George Costanza.MikeDamone said:
That would be illegal....creepycoug said:
sounds like there will be more people available to work in my yard and hang/remove Christmas lights for a reasonable fee. Marcos and his crew were getting pretty sloppy as it was, presumably because they were starting to see options to working for me. a little competition in the illegal labor market never hurts.MikeDamone said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
so where's the problem again? -
Socialist Mandate!!1!TheGlove said:
so 93k out of 635k.doogsinparadise said:
Everyone that voted for KS, voted for itThomasFremont said:
Only 9 people "voted" for it.haie said:OKB you're one of my favorite posters here but Damone is tearing up all of your assholes who agree to raising the minimum wage. Yes, 8-10$/hr is barely a living wage nowadays without being extremely frugal, but it's not like you can't get a 2nd job, go back to school (I'm surprised how many morons go to school for free) get some crowd funding idea, go make an app (You don't need to be some elite programmer to do any of that), etc. This is how these CEO's got to make obscene money, they grew the fucking company to the point where it could hire a ton of workers. And yes some of them may act like extravagant pigs, some of them work insanely hard and don't show off their money as much, but the common denominator is that if they fuck up the company, they will be gone (or if it's their own business, they're fucked). It's the risk you take.
raising the minimum is a fucking bad idea and a lot of the people in Seattle who voted for it will regret it if they're actually being objective about it afterwards and own a small business or are working these kind of jobs. fyfmfe
And yes everything I just said is pre-Econ101 shit. Fuck off
HTH
fuck those guys. -
Really? A $10.10 minimum wage is going to cost 500,000 jobs? Sounds like there's currently an overstock of useless jobs that don't even need to exist. Of course we are assuming here that the businesses currently offering these jobs are offering them not because they need them filled but simply from good will and the desire to pay someone a wage even though the job is completely unnecessary. The only difference between a libtard and a libertariantard are a few letters in the alphabet. Both are extremist in their views. BTW, instead of regurgitating the propaganda that someone else cut and pasted from a spurious website, why don't you explain to us, again, why 500,000 people would be shut out of the oconomy if minimum wage is raised to $10.10, since you cited the quote in your post.MikeDamone said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
I don't think "pressing" means what you think it does.
Did I say that 10.10 would severely harm the economy?
But you can find this a couple of posts up, If you take two seconds to read:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you). -
Here's my response to the $15 minimum wage thingy:
Big fucking deal.
Some people will be priced out of jobs, some business will raise their prices. But in the end, good business people will remain successful and good employees will remain employed.
Now all you fuckers can shut up. -
now I know you're whooshing Mike. either that or you are a Husky posing as a Duck trying to make Oregon look bad, which would be just shameful - who does that?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really? A $10.10 minimum wage is going to cost 500,000 jobs? Sounds like there's currently an overstock of useless jobs that don't even need to exist. Of course we are assuming here that the businesses currently offering these jobs are offering them not because they need them filled but simply from good will and the desire to pay someone a wage even though the job is completely unnecessary. The only difference between a libtard and a libertariantard are a few letters in the alphabet. Both are extremist in their views. BTW, instead of regurgitating the propaganda that someone else cut and pasted from a spurious website, why don't you explain to us, again, why 500,000 people would be shut out of the oconomy if minimum wage is raised to $10.10, since you cited the quote in your post.MikeDamone said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
I don't think "pressing" means what you think it does.
Did I say that 10.10 would severely harm the economy?
But you can find this a couple of posts up, If you take two seconds to read:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
there is no way your post is serious, unless your name is krisvashon. but i know her style and that ain't it. she's not clever enough to act stupid in a new way. -
After you were bitch slapped again you could have just said, yeah, but still...oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really? A $10.10 minimum wage is going to cost 500,000 jobs? Sounds like there's currently an overstock of useless jobs that don't even need to exist. Of course we are assuming here that the businesses currently offering these jobs are offering them not because they need them filled but simply from good will and the desire to pay someone a wage even though the job is completely unnecessary. The only difference between a libtard and a libertariantard are a few letters in the alphabet. Both are extremist in their views. BTW, instead of regurgitating the propaganda that someone else cut and pasted from a spurious website, why don't you explain to us, again, why 500,000 people would be shut out of the oconomy if minimum wage is raised to $10.10, since you cited the quote in your post.MikeDamone said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
I don't think "pressing" means what you think it does.
Did I say that 10.10 would severely harm the economy?
But you can find this a couple of posts up, If you take two seconds to read:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
Good thing there are people like you to make sure other can't work because their skills are worth less than 10.10 an hour. You are truly compassionate.
Yes, I'm sure businesses are hiring people to do work that isn't needed and unnecessarily increasing their costs because they are just being nice. I'm starting to think creepy is right and you're pulling off a wooosh. Because no one can be this economically illiterate. Basic Heyne in Kane stuff here.
Here is the "propaganda" from the Congressional Budget Office and their spurious website.
cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44995-MinimumWage.pdf
-
I'm starting to lean whoosh...but maybe Oregon has a krisvashon of their own.creepycoug said:
now I know you're whooshing Mike. either that or you are a Husky posing as a Duck trying to make Oregon look bad, which would be just shameful - who does that?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Really? A $10.10 minimum wage is going to cost 500,000 jobs? Sounds like there's currently an overstock of useless jobs that don't even need to exist. Of course we are assuming here that the businesses currently offering these jobs are offering them not because they need them filled but simply from good will and the desire to pay someone a wage even though the job is completely unnecessary. The only difference between a libtard and a libertariantard are a few letters in the alphabet. Both are extremist in their views. BTW, instead of regurgitating the propaganda that someone else cut and pasted from a spurious website, why don't you explain to us, again, why 500,000 people would be shut out of the oconomy if minimum wage is raised to $10.10, since you cited the quote in your post.MikeDamone said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
I don't think "pressing" means what you think it does.
Did I say that 10.10 would severely harm the economy?
But you can find this a couple of posts up, If you take two seconds to read:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
HTH
And CreepyCoug tells me I need quit picking on people who can't seem to punch back. (he was referring to you).
there is no way your post is serious, unless your name is krisvashon. but i know her style and that ain't it. she's not clever enough to act stupid in a new way. -
What about the 500,000? ... should they come live with you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Why don't you stop pressing and explain to us all why $10.10 will severely harm the economy.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, but still. Other people will get a raise as they will be better off and won't be getting jip'd...sarktastic said:
CBO forecasts a net loss of 500,000 jobs if Obama's minimum wage is raised to $10.10/hr.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I'm sure even you can figure out that a full time job that doesn't provide a liveable wage and requires someone to be on foodstamps is nothing more than a tax that everyone has to pay. The employer jips the workers and the result is that we all have to pour more money into the foodstamp program through taxes, which make the government a little bit bigger.MikeDamone said:
Yet he agrees with me and basically said your position can be reduced to shit with a basic understanding of freshman Econ.oregonblitzkrieg said:CreepyCuoag is the most clued in poster on the economic board.
You spout off, but refuse to educate yourself in the basics. I provided links to a couple things to help you, but you choose to remain ignorant.
- that is 500,000 people shut out of the Oconomy... and any chance of climbing the economic ladder, altogether (... and that's at $10.10 not $15) What about them?
