Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
ULOFOSHIO
Options
Comments
-
Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side.
-
Why even have coaches do anything besides recruit and throw the kidz out there post of the dayBCoveysLifeInsPolicy said:Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side. -
Quotes are meant to be misusedFremontTroll said:
Great quote but Antony goes on to do the opposite of what he initially proclaims.FireCohen said:
i come to bury caesar not to praise himRaceBannon said:
Score before 4th downdnc said:
Yeah, the OL chose to play for the FG and blew the kick.RaceBannon said:
Losers lose.dnc said:
Hi there, we ran all over Oregon when it mattered in 2018. Pete just wouldn't let them finish the job.RaceBannon said:
See the last two Oregon gamesPostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
They ran when we knew they would and couldn't run when we had to
It looks better this year. If results match the talent we think we have we should good to go
That shit was on Pete. They were clearly ready to win the game if he would have let them.
I have no issue with Pete sucking. Glad he's gone
Here was a Caesar, when comes such another? -
Seems to work for USCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why even have coaches do anything besides recruit and throw the kidz out there post of the dayBCoveysLifeInsPolicy said:Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side. -
Against pac 12 scrubsFireCohen said:
Seems to work for USCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why even have coaches do anything besides recruit and throw the kidz out there post of the dayBCoveysLifeInsPolicy said:Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side. -
Pac12 scrubs kicked our asses last yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Against pac 12 scrubsFireCohen said:
Seems to work for USCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why even have coaches do anything besides recruit and throw the kidz out there post of the dayBCoveysLifeInsPolicy said:Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side. -
USC has swagger.FireCohen said:
Pac12 scrubs kicked our asses last yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Against pac 12 scrubsFireCohen said:
Seems to work for USCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Why even have coaches do anything besides recruit and throw the kidz out there post of the dayBCoveysLifeInsPolicy said:Ulofoshio is an instinctive player with high athletic ability. The way Washington has used the ILB position in recent years requires that instinctiveness, along with better-than-average athleticism. BBK had those qualities. Victor and, to a lesser extent, Bierria, had those qualities as well.
Manu appeared to have some of the instinctiveness, but lacked the speed to act on it. Wellington had better athleticism, but worse instinct. I'd put Sirmon more on the Wellington end, but maybe with a bit better instinctiveness. The whiffs are bad.
Could a better LB coach get better results? Probably. This is one position where it seems as though the successful players have succeeded despite corching, rather than as a result of it.
Re: O-line success or lack thereof, I think this year's success compared to last, particularly in pass blocking, is attributable to coaching and improved scheme. Morris certainly has had some impact on that, as well--more mobile/elusive than Eason. But coach-wise, I would say Huff is clearly beneficial to the team, both as a coach and as a recruiter. I think Petersen's offensive scheme was harder to implement, and therefore made it more challenging to coach up the O-line, which is probably the unit that requires the most cohesive operation of any on the team.
Bob Gregory feels like JAG with coaching, and less impressive on the recruiting side.
Our DAWGS took on the persona of pete and were afraid of the playbook and the teams with swag -
Weren’t you there in rome when they actually killed caesarRaceBannon said:
One of my favorites. Saw it in some movie as a kid and thought it was craftyFremontTroll said:
Great quote but Antony goes on to do the opposite of what he initially proclaims.FireCohen said:
i come to bury caesar not to praise himRaceBannon said:
Score before 4th downdnc said:
Yeah, the OL chose to play for the FG and blew the kick.RaceBannon said:
Losers lose.dnc said:
Hi there, we ran all over Oregon when it mattered in 2018. Pete just wouldn't let them finish the job.RaceBannon said:
See the last two Oregon gamesPostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
They ran when we knew they would and couldn't run when we had to
It looks better this year. If results match the talent we think we have we should good to go
That shit was on Pete. They were clearly ready to win the game if he would have let them.
I have no issue with Pete sucking. Glad he's gone
Here was a Caesar, when comes such another?
But I really do want to bury Pete -
Race was retired and moved to Temecula errr EgyptFireCohen said:
Weren’t you there in rome when they actually killed caesarRaceBannon said:
One of my favorites. Saw it in some movie as a kid and thought it was craftyFremontTroll said:
Great quote but Antony goes on to do the opposite of what he initially proclaims.FireCohen said:
i come to bury caesar not to praise himRaceBannon said:
Score before 4th downdnc said:
Yeah, the OL chose to play for the FG and blew the kick.RaceBannon said:
Losers lose.dnc said:
Hi there, we ran all over Oregon when it mattered in 2018. Pete just wouldn't let them finish the job.RaceBannon said:
See the last two Oregon gamesPostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
They ran when we knew they would and couldn't run when we had to
It looks better this year. If results match the talent we think we have we should good to go
That shit was on Pete. They were clearly ready to win the game if he would have let them.
I have no issue with Pete sucking. Glad he's gone
Here was a Caesar, when comes such another?
But I really do want to bury Pete -
Stanford and Oregon? Sarksure.gifPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Our dwags are intimidated by those 3 teams until they arentRaceBannon said:Stanford wins this week and Jimmy sucks again
I like cocky Jimmy against Oregon and USC.
We? beat USC last year and it wasn’t terribly close. -
Blind squirrel found nutCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Stanford and Oregon? Sarksure.gifPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Our dwags are intimidated by those 3 teams until they arentRaceBannon said:Stanford wins this week and Jimmy sucks again
I like cocky Jimmy against Oregon and USC.
We? beat USC last year and it wasn’t terribly close. -
Bob didn’t even identify/PWO Eddie when he was playing next to the #1 LB in the country. He came here because it was the closest P5 school to Alaska. He contacted the recruiting staff/coaches.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
People here have been saying Bob got lucky with Azeem, Bierriaiaia, BBK, Eddy, etc.FremontTroll said:
The secondary and D-line have never had these problems. Because they've stacked talent.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Transfers ALWAYS happen. That is why you don't rely on one guy. Next man up. (not that Milo Eifler would have saved the day anyway.)
As is Bob actually got pretty lucky with Ulofoshio. The upside of only being responsible for two starting positions is you only need to find one guy every few years to put up a passable performance. BBK papered over a lot of Bob's deficiencies for three years.
At some point it's not luck, it's great coaching. -
You need the chair for this take.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Hard disagree.dnc said:
Sacks are more of a QB stat than an OL stat which has born out as all of a sudden there are no sacks.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
It's my favorite thing about Morris, btw.
If that were the case Russ would never get sacked, but the Hawks line has sucked in pass pro for years and one of the most elusive pocket QBs still get sacked.
Its 81% line 19% qb
-
The ancient tribe of LIPOers has been driven to near extinction by our oppressive rulers. We must band together to survive this attempted ethnocide. Rise up!FremontTroll said:
Its almost like "doogs" were complaining about the recruiting of his predecessor for years and Olinemen that are physically ready to play year one are exceedingly rare. How does Huff's line look this year?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
You are such a concrete thinker its probably why you love the "LIPO" philosophy. -
Yes, avoid 3rd down at all costs.FremontTroll said:
The best way to be successful on 3rd or 4th and short...is not to end up in 3rd or 4th and short.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
Our "power success rate" (3rd/4th and 2 or less to go) was 71.4% or 67th in the nation. Mediocre at best but not a killer- some terrible teams are ranked in the top ten and some good teams were worse than us (Minnesota, Oregon, Notre Dame, Utah.) -
Naw even Sean McGrew is shit talking Stanford to milquetoast reporters. If we don’t respeck you, we kick the shit out of you.RaceBannon said:Stanford wins this week and Jimmy sucks again
I like cocky Jimmy against Oregon and USC. -
You need the chair so this bored can be free of your hot takesbackthepack said:
You need the chair for this take.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Hard disagree.dnc said:
Sacks are more of a QB stat than an OL stat which has born out as all of a sudden there are no sacks.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
It's my favorite thing about Morris, btw.
If that were the case Russ would never get sacked, but the Hawks line has sucked in pass pro for years and one of the most elusive pocket QBs still get sacked.
Its 81% line 19% qb -
You’ve been really struggling in this thread PGOS. I don’t think your one to talk. Looks like you can’t talk ball. Sad!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You need the chair so this bored can be free of your hot takesbackthepack said:
You need the chair for this take.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Hard disagree.dnc said:
Sacks are more of a QB stat than an OL stat which has born out as all of a sudden there are no sacks.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
It's my favorite thing about Morris, btw.
If that were the case Russ would never get sacked, but the Hawks line has sucked in pass pro for years and one of the most elusive pocket QBs still get sacked.
Its 81% line 19% qb
-
Disagree. One of my armpit hairs knows more about football than youll ever know. No one is a better fluffer than you though, Ill give you that.backthepack said:
You’ve been really struggling in this thread PGOS. I don’t think your one to talk. Looks like you can’t talk ball. Sad!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You need the chair so this bored can be free of your hot takesbackthepack said:
You need the chair for this take.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Hard disagree.dnc said:
Sacks are more of a QB stat than an OL stat which has born out as all of a sudden there are no sacks.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
It's my favorite thing about Morris, btw.
If that were the case Russ would never get sacked, but the Hawks line has sucked in pass pro for years and one of the most elusive pocket QBs still get sacked.
Its 81% line 19% qb -
You think Bob Gregory is a good coach and I’m the fluffer?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. One of my armpit hairs knows more about football than youll ever know. No one is a better fluffer than you though, Ill give you that.backthepack said:
You’ve been really struggling in this thread PGOS. I don’t think your one to talk. Looks like you can’t talk ball. Sad!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You need the chair so this bored can be free of your hot takesbackthepack said:
You need the chair for this take.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Hard disagree.dnc said:
Sacks are more of a QB stat than an OL stat which has born out as all of a sudden there are no sacks.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
@racebannon preached this same point and can back me up on thisdnc said:
Except those who followed recruiting forecast the OL was going to have a big drop-off and wouldn't you know it, they were right.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a recruiting doog through and through cop out answer. Huff has been here long enough to have that be a bullshit excuse.dnc said:
He didn't get the same criticism because he wasn't coaching his own guys.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The defense by and large did enough to win. Every offensive position group fucking sucked. But Huff is a flashy recruiter so doogs dont give him the same criticism when we cant block against fucking Cal, Stanford, etc.dnc said:
LB wasn't the only underperforming group but it was the worst performing group and the only other one that was close had a new position coach who was coaching guys he didn't recruit.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im not handwaving it away. It was a disaster. There were other disasters on that team too...most position groups really underperformedFremontTroll said:
How do you just handwave away the 2019 linebacker performance?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Other position groups have had similar stories. I agree that was bad, but literally every other year LBs have been a strength. Fucking doogs like you hate him because he's not a sizzle recruiter.FireCohen said:
Dude after 1 game they could have just moved of from manu but they played him through the whole yearPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah no other position group has ever started someone when the backup was better....FireCohen said:
Dude he sat eddy behind manu, if that is not a fireable offense. I don’t fucking know what isPostGameOrangeSlices said:
We have had 1 bad LB year and 4 stellar ones.AtomicDawg said:
It’s his fault for not landing and keeping adequate talent year over year.RoadDawg55 said:
I know we hate Bobby, but it’s not really his fault if/when a 3rd string LB transfers. Kids want to play.FireCohen said:
I would like to personally bob Gregory for that cluster fuck of LB room. Kids going to transfer.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, the LB depth chart is a real cluster fuck because you have like 6 guys who are RS Sophs or RS Freshmen for 2 positions. So when people say we are deep at LB, that's true but eligibility wise we could really have some problems in a couple years. Some will leave for playing time elsewhere, and the rest will all graduate together. We took 1 lb last year (Bruener) and it appears we are only taking 1 this year (Latu) and he comes with a giant red flag. UW could be in a world of hurt at that position in a couple years.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Our LB situation is weird. I thought Tafisi looked good but now he is stuck behind two players with the same eligibility he has
One of those guys that aren’t in the mix are probably going to transfer. We have four guys the same class and two sophomores starting.
Unless those guys really want a UW degree, they aren’t going to stick around and be a 3rd or 4th string player.
And i will never forgive him for Wellington/Manu starting. Bob provides no value to the program and is a well paid assistant.
The Bob Gregory hate on this board never made any sense and is another DDYFS platitude
If you want to argue special teams, fine
He is responsible for two starting players out of eleven. It isn't hard. A year that bad is never excusable. Especially when it was entirely foreseeable years ahead of time based on how he was failing to stack talent. Look at all the guys we missed on 2015-2018. BBK only had 4 years of eligibility and we knew in 2016 he would be gone in two more years and Kieshawn and Azeem in one more year.
As it turned out we had to put an all out blitz on recruiting LBs in 2019 to try to make up for lost time. Now our roster is all jacked up in terms of class composition and yeah, a few of those guys are going to transfer.
Transfers happen. The eligibility situation is awkward, but you doogs cant preach recruit and let the best players play and then get upset with transfers.
Bob was the only coach on the staff who completely shit the bed with his own guys.
There's no one to blame but him.
This isn't hard.
If you want to talk differences in scheme I'll listen, but that is a fucking doog answer. If the predecessors guys werent good in year 3 then play the guys you recruited
It's not just recruiting but recruiting does matter.
We ran for 182 yards on 34 carries versus Cal and 104 on 19 carries versus Stanford. The OL didn't lose those games.
The OL wasn't good but it was significantly better than the LBs last year.
The line did fine run blocking until they absolutely had to get a yard in 3rd or 4th and short. Then they fucking sucked.
Pass pro was an abomination made worse by a statue of a QB, but has never been good
It's my favorite thing about Morris, btw.
If that were the case Russ would never get sacked, but the Hawks line has sucked in pass pro for years and one of the most elusive pocket QBs still get sacked.
Its 81% line 19% qb
