Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Attn Trumptards: time to let it go
Options
Comments
-
#SFGBobgethelp
Soon trending on twitter -
Told you he was mad.
lol -
-
I think I said this thing was over on election night when they froze the vote count.
Before that, in fact.
The.
Fix.
Was.
In.
HTH -
That's the only way the outcome of this election changes. They have to have rock solid proof of this for it to alter the outcome. Challenging individual ballots or instances where dead people are voting isn't going to impact enough votes to alter the outcome.RaceBannon said: -
This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist. -
Somebody needs a walk on the beachdoogie said:#SFGBobgethelp
Soon trending on twitter
and a weighted backpack
-
You can stand there in knee deep water when it’s 20* out and snowing at daybreak with the skies filled with ducks and geese, telling yourself that icy trickle on your toes filling your waders with water Isn’t a leak and it Will go away, for awhile.dflea said:Told you he was mad.
lol
But eventually... -
If I’m a Dominion programmer, I’ve already sent out resume’s to the Next voting machine company.RaceBannon said: -
I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.Bob_C said:
Iinsinceredawg said:I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.
Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.
What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?
Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that? -
And?Sledog said:
I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.Bob_C said:
Iinsinceredawg said:I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.
Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.
What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?
Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that? -
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
-
@doogie 's @MittRomneyDawg impersonation has passed 23 times
-
We need to know and we need to bring those responsible to justice. We also need to secure the system.doogie said:
And?Sledog said:
I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.Bob_C said:
Iinsinceredawg said:I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.
Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.
What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?
Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that?
What's your point? That cheating is good? What is good about not pursuing it? -
Mitt is a clown.
I just call it as I see it.
Now, if Mitt and his band of merry men throw down the Gauntlet on Election Fraud and mount a serious challenge? I could be persuaded this ain’t over.
Instead? We have Trump, alone, mounting a fight leaking out #2024 rumors. Embarrassing. -
Forgot about that one.dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
-
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
-
Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?dflea said:
I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.PurpleThrobber said:
Very simple question:dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?
Chances are, someone already did. Or will.
-
Not meGrundleStiltzkin said:
Forgot about that one.dflea said:This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.
Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.
Don't twist.
DarthRepublikan was a big proponent along with a lot of folks here who would prefer it was forgotten
Diebold was the key to the GOP stealing elections
Nothing really changes and the democrats will be back and ALL IN on fraud the next time they lose
