Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I don't think Kristi is going to be President

«134

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963
    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Do you ever get tired of being a complete Eunuch?
    Is a partial Eunuch even a thing?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Show me the Bodies!!!







  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited October 2020
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Do you ever get tired of being a complete Eunuch?
    Is a partial Eunuch even a thing?
    a little late for you to be asking that Now, don’t you think?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963
    doogie said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Do you ever get tired of being a complete Eunuch?
    Is a partial Eunuch even a thing?
    a little late for you to be asking that Now, don’t have think?
    "Complete Eunuch" wasn't my turn of phrase.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Did you just say “Slice em off”?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963
    doogie said:

    Did you just say “Slice em off”?

    driving it into the ground now
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Did you ask to keep them, take em home?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    Another lie. 2 weeks maybe a month

    So you want to go on record for Biden to institute a national lockdown next March if there is a spike in cases?

    You claim Trump should have done it. Governors that shut down had more deaths and economic pain. Yet here you are calling for more

    None of you gutless wonders would answer that question

    And I know why
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    Another lie. 2 weeks maybe a month

    So you want to go on record for Biden to institute a national lockdown next March if there is a spike in cases?

    You claim Trump should have done it. Governors that shut down had more deaths and economic pain. Yet here you are calling for more

    None of you gutless wonders would answer that question

    And I know why
    Washington got hit first and hard. We have 280 deaths per million. North Dakota has 336/ million. South Dakota has 267/Million. Most of the increase in the Dakotas has been over the past 45 days.

    Shut down? You can't even get them to tell their people to wear masks.

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited October 2020
    This state has a tiny fraction more supposed deaths than that state, none of which leads to bodies stacked like cordwood or hospitals and morgues being overrun with the Plague.

    Meanwhile, Inslee is whining that Boeing is telling you to fuck off as landmarks like Ivar’s close their doors, Chump, and you’re flying coach commercial to the Loo and then driving to the Ozarks to save whatever scam “business” you’re operating.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    Another lie. 2 weeks maybe a month

    So you want to go on record for Biden to institute a national lockdown next March if there is a spike in cases?

    You claim Trump should have done it. Governors that shut down had more deaths and economic pain. Yet here you are calling for more

    None of you gutless wonders would answer that question

    And I know why
    Washington got hit first and hard. We have 280 deaths per million. North Dakota has 336/ million. South Dakota has 267/Million. Most of the increase in the Dakotas has been over the past 45 days.

    Shut down? You can't even get them to tell their people to wear masks.

    Care to answer the question Joe?

    Chris Wallace isn't walking through the door
    I think I called your premise bullshit.

    But politely.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    H is nervous. Ozark investors called his bluff.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    Another lie. 2 weeks maybe a month

    So you want to go on record for Biden to institute a national lockdown next March if there is a spike in cases?

    You claim Trump should have done it. Governors that shut down had more deaths and economic pain. Yet here you are calling for more

    None of you gutless wonders would answer that question

    And I know why
    Washington got hit first and hard. We have 280 deaths per million. North Dakota has 336/ million. South Dakota has 267/Million. Most of the increase in the Dakotas has been over the past 45 days.

    Shut down? You can't even get them to tell their people to wear masks.

    Care to answer the question Joe?

    Chris Wallace isn't walking through the door
    I think I called your premise bullshit.

    But politely.
    What is my premise?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    SD has 214 currently hospitalized. Overrun? no

    SD has over 19,000 recovered.

    More proof Kristi will be President
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    The tell from the first debate is that even Democrats know blaming Trump for China Flu deaths is a loser. So, they pivoted to racism, which isn’t working as people look into violent whites, who are almost exclusively on the Left and vote Democrat.

    That’s the tell. @HHusky reads politics about as well as he reads his business partners.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    They averaged less than 2 deaths a day in Sept but ok.

    Keep lying Eunuch...

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,825 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    Did you just say “Slice em off”?

    Well you never even a partial man so what does that leave?
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,180 Founders Club
    Goduckies said:

    So they have the same death ratio and never closed down or destroyed their economy and you think that is bad.

    But still!
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sorry, but if the SD Health Department has a similar graph for deaths, I couldn't find it.

    But if you paid any attention at all, you'd know that the Dakotas are now putting up impressive death numbers for two states that don't either of them have even a million residents.
    Because there aren't deaths

    And no they aren't putting up impressive death numbers. That's a lie. As usual
    They got a late start, but they're racking 'em up lately. North Dakota has already blown past Washington in deaths as a percentage of population. South Dakota will do so in a few days.
    They averaged less than 2 deaths a day in Sept but ok.

    Keep lying Eunuch...

    Goduckies said:

    So they have the same death ratio and never closed down or destroyed their economy and you think that is bad.

    LIPO