NBA Players Boycott Game in Support of a Child Molester

PurpleThrobber said:

Swaye said:

DerekJohnson said:

Dude61 said:

The NBA is cutting the season short in order to pay respects to a man accused of raping a 15-year-old child last month. Just dissolve the league.

It's virtue signaling at its narcissistic worst. I would like to know who has the ear of the players.

The players are all idiots. Burn it down. NOGAF anymore. Let's have a sports free world going forward. More tim to fish.

Drinkin' and fuckin' would also be acceptable answers.

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

dnc said:

Wait how is he a child molester? I'ms sure it's been posted but IDontReallyReadYouGuys'Stuff.gif

https://www.newsweek.com/jacob-black-criminal-record-details-kenosha-shooting-1527708

Great guy? Quite the opposite it seems. Does it justify the excessive force used to detain him?

Was it excessive? According to one of the eyewitnesses the cops were yelling at him to drop the knife. He'd already been tazed and was fighting with the police. So what are the cops options as he reaches into his vehicle refusing to follow their commands?

Call a social worker.

So you were just running your mouth. Got it.

Always a tough crowd with you. Sorry, I'll be more clear. If all of those things end up being true and there was good cause to think he was going into his car for potentially a firearm, then sure, further force than a tazer may have been justified.

So you have no idea if it was excessive, you just called it excessive. Got it.

Not sure the point you’re making. If I didn’t know the entire context, then the force may not seem justified. Once I *do* know the entire context, I can say that the force may not have been excessive, even within the timeline of this thread.

I don’t have an initial distrust of police.

Looks photoshopped


Why would you distrust the enforcement arm of the government you love?

That’s the kicker, I don’t. I learn as I go with these stories. If he was an immediate threat, then use the force authorized to you for that specific scenario.

Just now, I saw another video of it that shows him being tazed while walking to his car and then being shot shortly thereafter. It didn’t *look* as if 7 shots were necessary, but again, this is why investigations happen.

What would have been the correct number of times to shoot him?

HustlinOwl said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

MikeDamone said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

SFGbob said:

MelloDawg said:

dnc said:

Wait how is he a child molester? I'ms sure it's been posted but IDontReallyReadYouGuys'Stuff.gif

https://www.newsweek.com/jacob-black-criminal-record-details-kenosha-shooting-1527708

Great guy? Quite the opposite it seems. Does it justify the excessive force used to detain him?

Was it excessive? According to one of the eyewitnesses the cops were yelling at him to drop the knife. He'd already been tazed and was fighting with the police. So what are the cops options as he reaches into his vehicle refusing to follow their commands?

Call a social worker.

So you were just running your mouth. Got it.

Always a tough crowd with you. Sorry, I'll be more clear. If all of those things end up being true and there was good cause to think he was going into his car for potentially a firearm, then sure, further force than a tazer may have been justified.

So you have no idea if it was excessive, you just called it excessive. Got it.

Not sure the point you’re making. If I didn’t know the entire context, then the force may not seem justified. Once I *do* know the entire context, I can say that the force may not have been excessive, even within the timeline of this thread.

I don’t have an initial distrust of police.

Looks photoshopped


Why would you distrust the enforcement arm of the government you love?

That’s the kicker, I don’t. I learn as I go with these stories. If he was an immediate threat, then use the force authorized to you for that specific scenario.

Just now, I saw another video of it that shows him being tazed while walking to his car and then being shot shortly thereafter. It didn’t *look* as if 7 shots were necessary, but again, this is why investigations happen.

What would have been the correct number of times to shoot him?

0