Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Since there is not any remaining doubt that the Steele Dossier was complete crap...

2

Comments

  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    Nothing will come of this and all the idiots who fell for it will feel no remorse whatsoever.
    The hate for Trump over rules all.

    I have some friends who only watch MSNBC and back it up with CNN to prove their hate. We do not talk politics. They are diehard democrats who vote a straight (in alignment) ticket.

    If you are anti-gay do you vote a cis-ticket?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973

    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Embarrassing and pathetic
    I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Embarrassing and pathetic
    I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
    You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.

    Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Embarrassing and pathetic
    I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
    You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.

    Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .

    Was he a liberal when he wrote that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion?
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Krauthammer was a classic liberal for most of his life . . . Transitioned to a Conservative when the Rats no longer had a place for the likes of Krauthammer and Lieberman. He ended his life as a “Never Trumper”.

    Krauthammer was a voice of reason and brilliant, unlike YOU.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973
    So we all agree it was collusion. Good!

  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973
    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    An opinion is not a fact . . .
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
    Krauthammer never batted 1.000 . . . not even close.

    Kind of doubt that your new found hero, Krauthammer, ever voted for Obama as the “fiscally responsible alternative” like YOU.

  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
    So you think opinion trumps a federal investigation

    You really are that stupid
    Yes, yes he is.


  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    I'm hearing trump colluded
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    I'd happily jump on any train that smeared pelosi and co.

    But at least I'd be up front about the fact I don't actually believe it I just hope it fucks her over.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Embarrassing and pathetic
    I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
    You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.

    Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .

    Was he a liberal when he wrote that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion?
    We he in a place to tender a verdict? Oh no, just an opinion. Opinions are like HH's.

    Why couldn't the 3 year investigation uncover this dastardly thing. Also please provide the US code section for collusion. I have tim.
  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,673
    HHusky and Adam Shifty have the same evidence of collision.
    They are just waiting for the right time to release it.
    They're really gonna get Trump this time!
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    An opinion is not a fact . . .
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Link?

    Link to what, Benny? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on HH.

  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    Falsified eveidence. Wire and data taps. All kinds of illegal surveillance and bupkis! Not a damn thing. I hope they have recordings of Obama and company setting this whole illegal spying disaster up all up.... Because Treason!

    Hang em
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    trublue said:

    Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.

    A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,171 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Trump Tower? You mean the DNC Deep State manufactured meeting? Sure dipshit there was RAT collusion all over that set up. Don Jr. was too anxious and stupid and jizzed like a 16 year old at the prom with the bait they tossed out. But you go ahead and hang your balls on that just like Hands up Don't Shoot. What a fucking analdouchnozel you are.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042

    trublue said:

    Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.

    A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.
    Smart move . . . I would have pile-driven your ignorant ass if you had persisted.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    I never cited the Steele Dossier for any purpose, blob. Not the first time I’ve had to remind you.

    Pathological fucking liar. Your entire basis for calling Race and I "Comrade" was based on the dossier. You're such a fucking pathetic liar Dazzler.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    Collusion was admitted.

    Obstruction was obvious.

    Ukraine was fucking treason.

    You girls just can’t get enough corruption!

    Yeah and this lying Kunt claims he never cited the dossier. He swallowed ever other fucking fraud, but he drew the line at the dossier.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I never cited the Steele Dossier for any purpose, blob. Not the first time I’ve had to remind you.

    You defended to the death and continue to defend the corrupt pieces of shit that used the dossier for a three year witch hunt and still claim collusion but you never cited it?

    Fuck off
    Plenty of evidence in plain sight for those who don’t suck orange cock.
    But crack partisan prosecutors/attorneys/politicians couldn't find it in three years.
    Real collusion. This is why leftist imbeciles such as @HHusky have to keep their mouth breathing base focused on one narrative at a tim.

    Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html

    And the Dazzler has never said a word against Hillary and the DNC's actions.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,792 Swaye's Wigwam
    so it was collusion - the penalty for collusion is....?

    The penalty seems to be a tirade of poasts on a sports themed website's politic board,
    by the Huckster @HHusky

    https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/is-collusion-a-crime.html

    Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines collusion as "secret cooperation for an illegal or dishonest purpose," but Webster's New World College Dictionary calls it "a secret agreement for fraudulent or illegal purpose; conspiracy." According to Black's Law Dictionary, collusion is "a deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right."

    Definitions offered by the latter two sources suggest illegal acts, but Merriam-Webster's definition is vaguer (i.e. simply being dishonest is not necessarily a crime). However, despite its "legalistic" tone, the term collusion has no specific legal meaning in criminal law; there's no such criminal charge called "collusion," nor does the term necessarily signal a criminal offense.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    trublue said:

    trublue said:

    Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.

    A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.
    Smart move . . . I would have pile-driven your ignorant ass if you had persisted.

    Like it's not pile driven regularly. Here there and everywhere!