Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Seems my memory was correct.
NOC what he said
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Seems my memory was correct.
NOC what he said
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
So you think opinion trumps a federal investigation
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Seems my memory was correct.
NOC what he said
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
Krauthammer never batted 1.000 . . . not even close.
Kind of doubt that your new found hero, Krauthammer, ever voted for Obama as the “fiscally responsible alternative” like YOU.
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Seems my memory was correct.
NOC what he said
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
So you think opinion trumps a federal investigation
Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
Embarrassing and pathetic
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.
Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.
HHusky and Adam Shifty have the same evidence of collision. They are just waiting for the right time to release it. They're really gonna get Trump this time!
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“
Seems my memory was correct.
NOC what he said
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Falsified eveidence. Wire and data taps. All kinds of illegal surveillance and bupkis! Not a damn thing. I hope they have recordings of Obama and company setting this whole illegal spying disaster up all up.... Because Treason!
Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
Trump Tower? You mean the DNC Deep State manufactured meeting? Sure dipshit there was RAT collusion all over that set up. Don Jr. was too anxious and stupid and jizzed like a 16 year old at the prom with the bait they tossed out. But you go ahead and hang your balls on that just like Hands up Don't Shoot. What a fucking analdouchnozel you are.
I never cited the Steele Dossier for any purpose, blob. Not the first time I’ve had to remind you.
You defended to the death and continue to defend the corrupt pieces of shit that used the dossier for a three year witch hunt and still claim collusion but you never cited it?
Fuck off
Plenty of evidence in plain sight for those who don’t suck orange cock.
But crack partisan prosecutors/attorneys/politicians couldn't find it in three years.
Real collusion. This is why leftist imbeciles such as @HHusky have to keep their mouth breathing base focused on one narrative at a tim.
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines collusion as "secret cooperation for an illegal or dishonest purpose," but Webster's New World College Dictionary calls it "a secret agreement for fraudulent or illegal purpose; conspiracy." According to Black's Law Dictionary, collusion is "a deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right."
Definitions offered by the latter two sources suggest illegal acts, but Merriam-Webster's definition is vaguer (i.e. simply being dishonest is not necessarily a crime). However, despite its "legalistic" tone, the term collusion has no specific legal meaning in criminal law; there's no such criminal charge called "collusion," nor does the term necessarily signal a criminal offense.
Comments
You really are that stupid
Kind of doubt that your new found hero, Krauthammer, ever voted for Obama as the “fiscally responsible alternative” like YOU.
But at least I'd be up front about the fact I don't actually believe it I just hope it fucks her over.
Why couldn't the 3 year investigation uncover this dastardly thing. Also please provide the US code section for collusion. I have tim.
They are just waiting for the right time to release it.
They're really gonna get Trump this time!
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.
The penalty seems to be a tirade of poasts on a sports themed website's politic board,
by the Huckster @HHusky
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/is-collusion-a-crime.html
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines collusion as "secret cooperation for an illegal or dishonest purpose," but Webster's New World College Dictionary calls it "a secret agreement for fraudulent or illegal purpose; conspiracy." According to Black's Law Dictionary, collusion is "a deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right."
Definitions offered by the latter two sources suggest illegal acts, but Merriam-Webster's definition is vaguer (i.e. simply being dishonest is not necessarily a crime). However, despite its "legalistic" tone, the term collusion has no specific legal meaning in criminal law; there's no such criminal charge called "collusion," nor does the term necessarily signal a criminal offense.