Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Since there is not any remaining doubt that the Steele Dossier was complete crap...

123578

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    An opinion is not a fact . . .
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
    Krauthammer never batted 1.000 . . . not even close.

    Kind of doubt that your new found hero, Krauthammer, ever voted for Obama as the “fiscally responsible alternative” like YOU.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing

    Exonerated
    I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.
    So you think opinion trumps a federal investigation

    You really are that stupid
    Yes, yes he is.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676
    I'm hearing trump colluded
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,676
    I'd happily jump on any train that smeared pelosi and co.

    But at least I'd be up front about the fact I don't actually believe it I just hope it fucks her over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,586 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.

    Embarrassing and pathetic
    I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.
    You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.

    Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .

    Was he a liberal when he wrote that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion?
    We he in a place to tender a verdict? Oh no, just an opinion. Opinions are like HH's.

    Why couldn't the 3 year investigation uncover this dastardly thing. Also please provide the US code section for collusion. I have tim.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,673
    HHusky and Adam Shifty have the same evidence of collision.
    They are just waiting for the right time to release it.
    They're really gonna get Trump this time!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    trublue said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    An opinion is not a fact . . .
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    trublue said:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer

    Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.

    “In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“

    Seems my memory was correct.
    NOC what he said

    Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing

    Nothing
    BennyBeaver said:

    Link?

    Link to what, Benny? Be very specific.

    I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on HH.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter