Since there is not any remaining doubt that the Steele Dossier was complete crap...
Comments
-
Nothing will come of this and all the idiots who fell for it will feel no remorse whatsoever.
The hate for Trump over rules all.
I have some friends who only watch MSNBC and back it up with CNN to prove their hate. We do not talk politics. They are diehard democrats who vote a straight (in alignment) ticket.
If you are anti-gay do you vote a cis-ticket? -
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.RaceBannon said:
Embarrassing and patheticHHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
-
We are all old enough to know that you are a lying piece of shit.HHusky said:
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.RaceBannon said:
Embarrassing and patheticHHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
We also know you have a terminal case of TDS.
Trump is your Daddy. -
You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.HHusky said:
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.RaceBannon said:
Embarrassing and patheticHHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .
-
Was he a liberal when he wrote that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion?trublue said:
You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.HHusky said:
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.RaceBannon said:
Embarrassing and patheticHHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . . -
Krauthammer was a classic liberal for most of his life . . . Transitioned to a Conservative when the Rats no longer had a place for the likes of Krauthammer and Lieberman. He ended his life as a “Never Trumper”.
Krauthammer was a voice of reason and brilliant, unlike YOU. -
So we all agree it was collusion. Good!
-
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”. -
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct. -
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated -
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.RaceBannon said:
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated -
So you think opinion trumps a federal investigationHHusky said:
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.RaceBannon said:
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
You really are that stupid -
An opinion is not a fact . . .HHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Krauthammer never batted 1.000 . . . not even close.HHusky said:
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.RaceBannon said:
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
Kind of doubt that your new found hero, Krauthammer, ever voted for Obama as the “fiscally responsible alternative” like YOU.
-
Link?
-
Yes, yes he is.RaceBannon said:
So you think opinion trumps a federal investigationHHusky said:
I’m gonna have to go with the reasonable, brilliant guy.RaceBannon said:
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Exonerated
You really are that stupid
-
I'm hearing trump colluded
-
I'd happily jump on any train that smeared pelosi and co.
But at least I'd be up front about the fact I don't actually believe it I just hope it fucks her over. -
We he in a place to tender a verdict? Oh no, just an opinion. Opinions are like HH's.HHusky said:
Was he a liberal when he wrote that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion?trublue said:
You’re ALSO old enough to remember when Krauthammer was a Democrat, “Mr. Conservative”.HHusky said:
I’m old enough to remember when Charles Krauthammer was a conservative.RaceBannon said:
Embarrassing and patheticHHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
Krauthammer was a speechwriter for VP Walter Mondale. He spent a lengthy period of his political career writing for the New Republic, Time magazine and the Washington Post, all bastions of conservatism.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Avoid substance and facts. Stick to what you do best: the one-line insults . . .
Why couldn't the 3 year investigation uncover this dastardly thing. Also please provide the US code section for collusion. I have tim. -
HHusky and Adam Shifty have the same evidence of collision.
They are just waiting for the right time to release it.
They're really gonna get Trump this time! -
trublue said:
An opinion is not a fact . . .HHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.HHusky said:RaceBannon said:
NOC what he saidHHusky said:
“In July 2017 following the release by Donald Trump Jr. of the email chain about the Trump Tower meeting on June 9, 2016, Krauthammer opined that even bungled collusion is still collusion.“trublue said:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krauthammer
Poasted to help you with your memory, “Counselor”.
Seems my memory was correct.
Opinion is not fact. Three years of an anal probe and nothing
Nothing
Link to what, Benny? Be very specific.BennyBeaver said:Link?
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on HH. -
Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug. -
Hang emSledog said:Falsified eveidence. Wire and data taps. All kinds of illegal surveillance and bupkis! Not a damn thing. I hope they have recordings of Obama and company setting this whole illegal spying disaster up all up.... Because Treason!
-
A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.trublue said:Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug. -
Trump Tower? You mean the DNC Deep State manufactured meeting? Sure dipshit there was RAT collusion all over that set up. Don Jr. was too anxious and stupid and jizzed like a 16 year old at the prom with the bait they tossed out. But you go ahead and hang your balls on that just like Hands up Don't Shoot. What a fucking analdouchnozel you are.HHusky said:Trump Tower, Gasbag. Being shitty at collusion is still collusion.
-
Smart move . . . I would have pile-driven your ignorant ass if you had persisted.BennyBeaver said:
A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.trublue said:Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.
-
Pathological fucking liar. Your entire basis for calling Race and I "Comrade" was based on the dossier. You're such a fucking pathetic liar Dazzler.HHusky said:I never cited the Steele Dossier for any purpose, blob. Not the first time I’ve had to remind you.
-
Yeah and this lying Kunt claims he never cited the dossier. He swallowed ever other fucking fraud, but he drew the line at the dossier.HHusky said:Collusion was admitted.
Obstruction was obvious.
Ukraine was fucking treason.
You girls just can’t get enough corruption! -
And the Dazzler has never said a word against Hillary and the DNC's actions.NorthwestFresh said:
Real collusion. This is why leftist imbeciles such as @HHusky have to keep their mouth breathing base focused on one narrative at a tim.Sledog said:
But crack partisan prosecutors/attorneys/politicians couldn't find it in three years.HHusky said:
Plenty of evidence in plain sight for those who don’t suck orange cock.RaceBannon said:
You defended to the death and continue to defend the corrupt pieces of shit that used the dossier for a three year witch hunt and still claim collusion but you never cited it?HHusky said:I never cited the Steele Dossier for any purpose, blob. Not the first time I’ve had to remind you.
Fuck off
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html -
so it was collusion - the penalty for collusion is....?
The penalty seems to be a tirade of poasts on a sports themed website's politic board,
by the Huckster @HHusky
https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/is-collusion-a-crime.html
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines collusion as "secret cooperation for an illegal or dishonest purpose," but Webster's New World College Dictionary calls it "a secret agreement for fraudulent or illegal purpose; conspiracy." According to Black's Law Dictionary, collusion is "a deceitful agreement or compact between two or more persons, for the one party to bring an action against the other for some evil purpose, as to defraud a third party of his right."
Definitions offered by the latter two sources suggest illegal acts, but Merriam-Webster's definition is vaguer (i.e. simply being dishonest is not necessarily a crime). However, despite its "legalistic" tone, the term collusion has no specific legal meaning in criminal law; there's no such criminal charge called "collusion," nor does the term necessarily signal a criminal offense. -
Like it's not pile driven regularly. Here there and everywhere!trublue said:
Smart move . . . I would have pile-driven your ignorant ass if you had persisted.BennyBeaver said:
A link to where I sincerely gave a fuck about this topic.trublue said:Link to what, “Benny”? Be very specific.
I’m here to please all the “Beavers” on the Tug.