Husky Jacks open thread [2020]
Comments
-
I looked through and thought most of the weights looked good. It's a good sign that the changes have gotten small compared to last year where many guys had double digit gains.
I think our inside LBs would be right at 230 with BBK like mobility in a perfect world, but we can't seem to get there because UW doesnt recruit many Alabam, LSU or even USC level LB prospects. I'd take 210 and quick over 240 and plodding. -
-
Everyone going to be excited about these LB and WR weights until they try running around on the field and end up looking like they were trained by FSP
-
This. Huge up front. Fast everywhere else.chuck said:I looked through and thought most of the weights looked good. It's a good sign that the changes have gotten small compared to last year where many guys had double digit gains.
I think our inside LBs would be right at 230 with BBK like mobility in a perfect world, but we can't seem to get there because UW doesnt recruit many Alabam, LSU or even USC level LB prospects. I'd take 210 and quick over 240 and plodding. -
-
I like to think back to Reuben Foster at Bama... he was up to 240 early in his career and was underperforming. Then he dropped to 220 and played like an All American his senior year because he was flying all over the fieldchuck said:I looked through and thought most of the weights looked good. It's a good sign that the changes have gotten small compared to last year where many guys had double digit gains.
I think our inside LBs would be right at 230 with BBK like mobility in a perfect world, but we can't seem to get there because UW doesnt recruit many Alabam, LSU or even USC level LB prospects. I'd take 210 and quick over 240 and plodding. -
He also of "best play caller in America" etc etc. But still, FYFMFE
-
ESPN should thank the Coronavirus for allowing us to play college football at all!GrundleStiltzkin said:He also of "best play caller in America" etc etc. But still, FYFMFE
-
Yep. The thumper talk on here is stupid and dated. A lot of the best LB’s in recent years were not big, but fast. Devin White, Foster, Devin Bush, etc. Foster was great his senior year and was listed at 221.NEsnake12 said:
I like to think back to Reuben Foster at Bama... he was up to 240 early in his career and was underperforming. Then he dropped to 220 and played like an All American his senior year because he was flying all over the fieldchuck said:I looked through and thought most of the weights looked good. It's a good sign that the changes have gotten small compared to last year where many guys had double digit gains.
I think our inside LBs would be right at 230 with BBK like mobility in a perfect world, but we can't seem to get there because UW doesnt recruit many Alabam, LSU or even USC level LB prospects. I'd take 210 and quick over 240 and plodding.
Playing in the 220’s in college is fine. They bulk up a little bit for the NFL. If they are big and fast, great, but those guys are rare. We don’t really play a lot of run heavy teams either.
