Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Way Too Fucking Early Schedule Breakdown
Comments
-
Yeah, I've been following Dave for a couple years now. Really like his formula and usually seems to be really accurate. I said the 8 wins because he recently posted a new coaches coach effect thing. But if he said 10 in a tweet then maybe that is what it will be. I know they are doing a magazine this year, should be cool.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I saw Dave Barto who runs that site tweet he is probably going to put UW at 10 wins. I think the 8-5 might have been from last year.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I think CFBMatrix has us going 8-5 this year. I am not 100% sure on that, but he notes that it is hard to predict with new coaches coming in.
If he does predict 8 wins and we end up winning 10 lets say, that would mean Pete in his first season is a +2 coach effect. I can't see any way we only win 8 games.
He nailed last year btw. He said last year has 10 win talent but Sark is a minus one win coach so he put 9-3. Actually he even underestimated Sark as he went 8-4.
I always tell this to Doogs how Sark was the only coach in America to be a negative win coach in five straight seasons. They always respond "Well he's a Duck fan so he's obviously bias against us". I'm like him being a Duck fan has nothing to do it with, it's pure math analysis. -
"It will be interesting to see this board after Petersen loses a game"
-Ken Griswold -
We lose to ASU but are still at 10 wins
Holiday or Alamo -
Cleaned that up for you.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@ Hawai'i: Craves it
Eastern Washington: Craves it
Illinois: Yes
Georgia State: Craves it
Stanford: Yes
BYE
@ California: Craves it
@ Oregon: No
Arizona State: Yes
@ Colorado: Craves it
UCLA: Yes
@ Arizona: No
Oregon State: Yes
@ Washington State: Craves it -
why? they lose like 10 defensive starters, and Graham is a slightly better Sark = consistently inconsistent.HuskyJW said:We lose to ASU
-
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State. -
No it was me who said we've been saying this for years. Some of you need to learn the difference.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
i think roaddoog brought up the (valid) point that people have been saying the same shit about stanford regressing for years. while that's true, I think their schedule is too difficult for them to finish higher than 3rd in the ridiculously strong north next year.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No you didn't. We all agreed Stanford was going to take a step backwards. Where you got ripped was saying WSU was going to pass Stanford.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I got ripped in the Leach thread for saying Stanford is going to take a step backwards next year, but they really are. Hogan can't put the team on his back; he is a "game manager" that isn't very clutch. I've never seen Hogan take over a game, but he's never had to, because Stanford has been much greater than the sum of its parts for a while now.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Probably cause UW defeated them two years ago and should have defeated them last year with Dude Brah as coach.Dardanus said:Why is everyone so quick to mark a W for the Stanford game? Because they lost Skov, Gardner, and Murphy? That's still going to be a tough game.
I think that will be the first big test in Petersen's career. However, at home I think that's a game you gotta win.
Stanford I read also returns the fewest starters in the conference while UCLA returns the most.
However, having to replace a bunch of starters, coupled with a difficult schedule (@UW, @UO, @UCLA), means that Furd is gonna struggle next year.
You might want to learn the difference.
I think Stanford falls to the middle of the pack but they won't go back to the Walt Harris Stanford days either. -
UW has four automatic OOC wins on the schedule. Going 6-3 in the conference isn't a stretch with a coaching upgrade from 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
-
Oregon is always craves it regardless.......TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Cleaned that up for you.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@ Hawai'i: Craves it
Eastern Washington: Craves it
Illinois: Yes
Georgia State: Craves it
Stanford: Yes
BYE
@ California: Craves it
@ Oregon: No
Arizona State: Yes
@ Colorado: Craves it
UCLA: Yes
@ Arizona: No
Oregon State: Yes
@ Washington State: Craves it
-
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is
-
They always have our number it seems....can't even remember the last time we (I like to say we like I'm part of the team) beat them.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
why? they lose like 10 defensive starters, and Graham is a slightly better Sark = consistently inconsistent.HuskyJW said:We lose to ASU
-
I just want Petersen to succeed so Kim can be wrong!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is
-
That was someone else. I am in complete agreement that Stanford is taking a step back, but they are still going to be tough. I see an 8 or 9 win season instead of 11. They are losing a lot off that defense. Murphy and Skov were really fucking good. I know they have recruited very well at OL, but losing 4 starters is never ideal, same with losing a 1,800 yard rusher. Gaffney didn't get that much attention because of Sankey and Carey, but he had a great season.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
i think roaddoog brought up the (valid) point that people have been saying the same shit about stanford regressing for years. while that's true, I think their schedule is too difficult for them to finish higher than 3rd in the ridiculously strong north next year.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No you didn't. We all agreed Stanford was going to take a step backwards. Where you got ripped was saying WSU was going to pass Stanford.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I got ripped in the Leach thread for saying Stanford is going to take a step backwards next year, but they really are. Hogan can't put the team on his back; he is a "game manager" that isn't very clutch. I've never seen Hogan take over a game, but he's never had to, because Stanford has been much greater than the sum of its parts for a while now.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Probably cause UW defeated them two years ago and should have defeated them last year with Dude Brah as coach.Dardanus said:Why is everyone so quick to mark a W for the Stanford game? Because they lost Skov, Gardner, and Murphy? That's still going to be a tough game.
I think that will be the first big test in Petersen's career. However, at home I think that's a game you gotta win.
Stanford I read also returns the fewest starters in the conference while UCLA returns the most.
However, having to replace a bunch of starters, coupled with a difficult schedule (@UW, @UO, @UCLA), means that Furd is gonna struggle next year.
You might want to learn the difference.
-
You're funny GloveTheGlove said:7-6
-
When was the last time UW had a real head coach? That was also the last time UW defeated ASU which was 2001.HuskyJW said:They always have our number it seems....can't even remember the last time we (I like to say we like I'm part of the team) beat them.
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
why? they lose like 10 defensive starters, and Graham is a slightly better Sark = consistently inconsistent.HuskyJW said:We lose to ASU
-
I'm digging the girl in the front. The blondes are kinda weak.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Oregon is always craves it regardless.......TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Cleaned that up for you.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@ Hawai'i: Craves it
Eastern Washington: Craves it
Illinois: Yes
Georgia State: Craves it
Stanford: Yes
BYE
@ California: Craves it
@ Oregon: No
Arizona State: Yes
@ Colorado: Craves it
UCLA: Yes
@ Arizona: No
Oregon State: Yes
@ Washington State: Craves it
-
I just saw the girl in the front and ran with that pic. The girls in the back are weak. The girl in front is a huge lock for craves it. Just looks slutty in that pic even.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm digging the girl in the front. The blondes are kinda weak.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Oregon is always craves it regardless.......TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Cleaned that up for you.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@ Hawai'i: Craves it
Eastern Washington: Craves it
Illinois: Yes
Georgia State: Craves it
Stanford: Yes
BYE
@ California: Craves it
@ Oregon: No
Arizona State: Yes
@ Colorado: Craves it
UCLA: Yes
@ Arizona: No
Oregon State: Yes
@ Washington State: Craves it -
9-4 last year and this season there is 1 extra game + an easier schedule. And a better head coach and 17/22 returning starters. Hardly a stretch to predict 10 wins.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
UW has four automatic OOC wins on the schedule. Going 6-3 in the conference isn't a stretch with a coaching upgrade from 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State. -
Agree. I think where special teams always cost us at least one game a year under dude brah I think there might even be a game where we walk away saying "Damn Special Teams won that game".HeretoBeatmyChest said:
9-4 last year and this season there is 1 extra game + an easier schedule. And a better head coach and 17/22 returning starters. Hardly a stretch to predict 10 wins.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
UW has four automatic OOC wins on the schedule. Going 6-3 in the conference isn't a stretch with a coaching upgrade from 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State. -
call me a doog.... just beat Oregon. It's waaaaaay beyond time. There is no way this fucking shit can be allowed to continue. I don't care who the coach is. Oregon is on a downward trajectory given last year's crying and such. The time has come.
-
Please link my "Boovin' it for Riley." I'll wait...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is -
http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=332850265TheGlove said:
Please link my "Boovin' it for Riley." I'll wait...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is
Low tweak I know. -
It would be nice to beat Oregon and I'm sure I would doog it up if it happened. I would still rather have a 12-1 season and a loss to Oregon than 10-3 with a win against Oregon.ApostleofGrief said:call me a doog.... just beat Oregon. It's waaaaaay beyond time. There is no way this fucking shit can be allowed to continue. I don't care who the coach is. Oregon is on a downward trajectory given last year's crying and such. The time has come.
-
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/9288/athlon-s-coaches-ranking-note-to-johnbsfTheGlove said:
Please link my "Boovin' it for Riley." I'll wait...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is -
All this talk hurts my head. Just fucking win 10 minimum or GTFO. 11 makes me happy. 12 makes me blow Pete in Red Square while giving Boobs 10 minutes to draw a crowd.
-
Not your best effort.He_Needs_More_Time said:
http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=332850265TheGlove said:
Please link my "Boovin' it for Riley." I'll wait...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is
Low tweak I know.
-
Nothing else matters.ApostleofGrief said:call me a doog.... just beat Oregon. It's waaaaaay beyond time. There is no way this fucking shit can be allowed to continue. I don't care who the coach is. Oregon is on a downward trajectory given last year's crying and such. The time has come.
-
Was trying to rile up PGOS. His link to prove Glove was Boovin it for Riley was awesome though.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Not your best effort.He_Needs_More_Time said:
http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=332850265TheGlove said:
Please link my "Boovin' it for Riley." I'll wait...PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You've definitely been boovin' it for Riley.TheGlove said:
Please don't mistake me for a Boov. I've watched a ton of Pac 8/10/12 football and I think people predicting 10+ wins for the Huskies are going to be unhappy.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Yeah....unhappiness that we didn't beat OSU by fucking 69 again...just rather easily, say 44-17?TheGlove said:Gonna be a lot of unhappiness around here in November.
This has nothing to do with Oregon State.
It's about time for people to predict 10 wins and have high standards for the program. That said, 7-6 would be ironically funny, but still fucking suck.
If 7-6 occurs, this message board will be ever more "over capacity" than it currently is
Low tweak I know. -
Swaye said:
All this talk hurts my head. Just fucking win 10 minimum or GTFO. 11 makes me happy. 12 makes me blow Pete in Red Square while giving Boobs 53 seconds to draw a crowd.
-
great schedule analysis, but enough said about that... when do we next get to play USC?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
