Imagine hating Trump so much that you find yourself siding with the Iranians
Comments
-
DerekJohnson said:
They were part of the Husky Half Brain Revolution. Doesn't that count?PurpleBaze said:And I like how a couple of soft pussies who have never lived in a country that went through a revolution and a war try to lecture me about this shit.
-
The articles PGOS linked as proof here are hysterical. United Against Nuclear Iran is a Sheldon “let’s nuke Tehran” Adelson funded “think tank” full of GWB neocon alumni.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Iran has a history of doing it:dhdawg said:
no there fucking isn'tPostGameOrangeSlices said:@ThomasFremont
Iran having nukes is not a good thing for the world
Obama bribed them to stop. There is a lot of evidence Iran did not stop enriching uranium in facilities deep in the mountains. This is a country that is an extremely violent theocracy and pariah state in the world stage. The kind of country you could maybe see hitting launch on nukes aimed towards Saudi Arabia, Isreal, and the US.
There is a reason the government of Isreal and Saudi Arabia hates Iran more than each other
Saudi Arabia is backwards in many ways, but is a Muslim majority country that is mostly friendly with us. That is incredibly important in that area. SA leadership and Royal Family likes luxury more than religion.
Iran, not so much. The Ayatollah could pray and come to the conclusion nukes need to be launched tomorrow because of religion.
This type of country can't really be trusted
https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/violation-of-treaties
And currently, Iran is not allowing neutral inspectors. So we are just taking them at their word.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/national-security/355949-iran-is-violating-the-deal?amp
That source is even anti Trump, from the Hill, and says Iran is going to get nukes and is violating the treaty.
There's a word for thinkers like you. It's called naive.
Hell, if I was an Iran government figure Id desperately want nukes too. They are surrounded by enemies. They are the only Shia power in the world, essentially. Even if they don't want to be the aggressor they are a good insurance policy to prevent attacks ala Iraq. 5th biggest military in the world steam rolled in a couple days.
The second link is to an Alan “I only got massages from Epstein’s underage girls with my underwear on” Dershowitz. Here’s some advice: the IAEA which got Iraq right in 2002 is a much better resource than these chickenhawks. And they continue to say Iran isn’t violating the limits set forth in the deal. Try a little harder next time. -
Lou Dobbs!!!!!HardlyClothed said:
The articles PGOS linked as proof here are hysterical. United Against Nuclear Iran is a Sheldon “let’s nuke Tehran” Adelson funded “think tank” full of GWB neocon alumni.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Iran has a history of doing it:dhdawg said:
no there fucking isn'tPostGameOrangeSlices said:@ThomasFremont
Iran having nukes is not a good thing for the world
Obama bribed them to stop. There is a lot of evidence Iran did not stop enriching uranium in facilities deep in the mountains. This is a country that is an extremely violent theocracy and pariah state in the world stage. The kind of country you could maybe see hitting launch on nukes aimed towards Saudi Arabia, Isreal, and the US.
There is a reason the government of Isreal and Saudi Arabia hates Iran more than each other
Saudi Arabia is backwards in many ways, but is a Muslim majority country that is mostly friendly with us. That is incredibly important in that area. SA leadership and Royal Family likes luxury more than religion.
Iran, not so much. The Ayatollah could pray and come to the conclusion nukes need to be launched tomorrow because of religion.
This type of country can't really be trusted
https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/violation-of-treaties
And currently, Iran is not allowing neutral inspectors. So we are just taking them at their word.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/national-security/355949-iran-is-violating-the-deal?amp
That source is even anti Trump, from the Hill, and says Iran is going to get nukes and is violating the treaty.
There's a word for thinkers like you. It's called naive.
Hell, if I was an Iran government figure Id desperately want nukes too. They are surrounded by enemies. They are the only Shia power in the world, essentially. Even if they don't want to be the aggressor they are a good insurance policy to prevent attacks ala Iraq. 5th biggest military in the world steam rolled in a couple days.
The second link is to an Alan “I only got massages from Epstein’s underage girls with my underwear on” Dershowitz. Here’s some advice: the IAEA which got Iraq right in 2002 is a much better resource than these chickenhawks. And they continue to say Iran isn’t violating the limits set forth in the deal. Try a little harder next time. -
-
Kerry supposedly meeting with Iranians in Paris today.
Let 'er rip! -
If the Iran foreign minister says it, it must be true.Sledog said:Kerry supposedly meeting with Iranians in Paris today.
Let 'er rip! -
Pretty sure I already called Hunter Biden as the bagman on kickbacks for the pallets of cash left in the desert....ThomasFremont said:
If the Iran foreign minister says it, it must be true.Sledog said:Kerry supposedly meeting with Iranians in Paris today.
Let 'er rip!
-
Under Obama that's was the game. Kickbacks from foreign aid. Much of it laundered through the Clinton foundation.PurpleThrobber said:
Pretty sure I already called Hunter Biden as the bagman on kickbacks for the pallets of cash left in the desert....ThomasFremont said:
If the Iran foreign minister says it, it must be true.Sledog said:Kerry supposedly meeting with Iranians in Paris today.
Let 'er rip! -
White FlagHardlyClothed said:
The articles PGOS linked as proof here are hysterical. United Against Nuclear Iran is a Sheldon “let’s nuke Tehran” Adelson funded “think tank” full of GWB neocon alumni.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Iran has a history of doing it:dhdawg said:
no there fucking isn'tPostGameOrangeSlices said:@ThomasFremont
Iran having nukes is not a good thing for the world
Obama bribed them to stop. There is a lot of evidence Iran did not stop enriching uranium in facilities deep in the mountains. This is a country that is an extremely violent theocracy and pariah state in the world stage. The kind of country you could maybe see hitting launch on nukes aimed towards Saudi Arabia, Isreal, and the US.
There is a reason the government of Isreal and Saudi Arabia hates Iran more than each other
Saudi Arabia is backwards in many ways, but is a Muslim majority country that is mostly friendly with us. That is incredibly important in that area. SA leadership and Royal Family likes luxury more than religion.
Iran, not so much. The Ayatollah could pray and come to the conclusion nukes need to be launched tomorrow because of religion.
This type of country can't really be trusted
https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/violation-of-treaties
And currently, Iran is not allowing neutral inspectors. So we are just taking them at their word.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/national-security/355949-iran-is-violating-the-deal?amp
That source is even anti Trump, from the Hill, and says Iran is going to get nukes and is violating the treaty.
There's a word for thinkers like you. It's called naive.
Hell, if I was an Iran government figure Id desperately want nukes too. They are surrounded by enemies. They are the only Shia power in the world, essentially. Even if they don't want to be the aggressor they are a good insurance policy to prevent attacks ala Iraq. 5th biggest military in the world steam rolled in a couple days.
The second link is to an Alan “I only got massages from Epstein’s underage girls with my underwear on” Dershowitz. Here’s some advice: the IAEA which got Iraq right in 2002 is a much better resource than these chickenhawks. And they continue to say Iran isn’t violating the limits set forth in the deal. Try a little harder next time.
-
