Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Imagine hating Trump so much that you find yourself siding with the Iranians
Comments
-
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then. -
...and fuck me for getting sucked into the Tug. Goddammit!
-
Just when you thought you were outPurpleBaze said:...and fuck me for getting sucked into the Tug. Goddammit!
-
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against. -
President-elects can be idealistic and often times they can't accomplish all that they want. Just ask Obama.dhdawg said:
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against.
You can be anti-war all you want, but unfortunately the world is a dynamic place and there are too many Khameneis out there. Again, why is Iran meddling in Iraq? If a country like Iran would actually mind its own business and pull out, then there would be no need for the US to take action. I'm not a "Trumptard", but he has shown a lot of restraint with Iran.
Why was Iran's SS general in Iraq? -
Trump orders the death of the number 2 guy in Iran and you call that restraint?PurpleBaze said:
President-elects can be idealistic and often times they can't accomplish all that they want. Just ask Obama.dhdawg said:
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against.
You can be anti-war all you want, but unfortunately the world is a dynamic place and there are too many Khameneis out there. Again, why is Iran meddling in Iraq? If a country like Iran would actually mind its own business and pull out, then there would be no need for the US to take action. I'm not a "Trumptard", but he has shown a lot of restraint with Iran.
Why was Iran's SS general in Iraq?
OK! -
Everyone forgets about when he called off an attack on Iran that would have killed civilians. He was chastised for it by some people.ThomasFremont said:
Trump orders the death of the number 2 guy in Iran and you call that restraint?PurpleBaze said:
President-elects can be idealistic and often times they can't accomplish all that they want. Just ask Obama.dhdawg said:
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against.
You can be anti-war all you want, but unfortunately the world is a dynamic place and there are too many Khameneis out there. Again, why is Iran meddling in Iraq? If a country like Iran would actually mind its own business and pull out, then there would be no need for the US to take action. I'm not a "Trumptard", but he has shown a lot of restraint with Iran.
Why was Iran's SS general in Iraq?
OK!
Again, why was Soleimani, a 40-year Revolutionary Guard and a General in Iraq? -
Yes he didn't have #1 killed. It's called a message.ThomasFremont said:
Trump orders the death of the number 2 guy in Iran and you call that restraint?PurpleBaze said:
President-elects can be idealistic and often times they can't accomplish all that they want. Just ask Obama.dhdawg said:
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against.
You can be anti-war all you want, but unfortunately the world is a dynamic place and there are too many Khameneis out there. Again, why is Iran meddling in Iraq? If a country like Iran would actually mind its own business and pull out, then there would be no need for the US to take action. I'm not a "Trumptard", but he has shown a lot of restraint with Iran.
Why was Iran's SS general in Iraq?
OK! -
And I like how a couple of soft pussies who have never lived in a country that went through a revolution and a war try to lecture me about this shit.
-
Called off an attack that he green lit in the first place. Manufacturing a crisis 101.PurpleBaze said:
Everyone forgets about when he called off an attack on Iran that would have killed civilians. He was chastised for it by some people.ThomasFremont said:
Trump orders the death of the number 2 guy in Iran and you call that restraint?PurpleBaze said:
President-elects can be idealistic and often times they can't accomplish all that they want. Just ask Obama.dhdawg said:
you argument is that we need to keep getting more involved in order to mitigate the damage that we did by getting involved in the first place.PurpleBaze said:
Yes, the US was duped by the Brits to help get rid of Mosaddegh in the 50's. That was a huge blunder on the part of the Eisenhower administration. Mosaddegh nationalized the Iranian oil and the Brits wanted to take back control of the oil facilities there.dhdawg said:
the answer is yes, it started with a CIA coup in the 50's.BleachedAnusDawg said:
The only reason Iran hates the US is because we're in the Middle East? Is this a serious post?dhdawg said:fucking childish bullshit. the only reason there are "sides" is because we are there in the first place.
Why are we in Iraq in the first place. if we simply just pulled out the threat would be gone. But keep cheering on the war machine.
It doesn't much matter now why we? are in Iraq. The bottom line is that the US now has a presence in Iraq. Why the fuck is Iran meddling in Iraq with Iran's own version of Schutzstaffel? The Revolutionary Guard started as a bunch of rag-tag wannabes in the early days of the current regime. Over the years, they were converted into an organized and trained military branch. They are not that much better than the SS. Why are they trying to stir the shit in Iraq?
Do you seriously think that if the US pulled out of Iraq that the threat would be gone? Iran would like nothing more than to have a larger footprint in the region. The US fucked up the war in Iraq. We? didn't go far enough, in effect destabilizing the country and then resting on our laurels while Islamic State flourished, while the previous president called them the "JV team".
No one is cheering the war machine, especially not me. But, certain things need to be dealt with swiftly and with a lot of force. When it comes to Middle East countries, the more force the better. They will actually respect you then.
Endless war that Trump once pretended to be against.
You can be anti-war all you want, but unfortunately the world is a dynamic place and there are too many Khameneis out there. Again, why is Iran meddling in Iraq? If a country like Iran would actually mind its own business and pull out, then there would be no need for the US to take action. I'm not a "Trumptard", but he has shown a lot of restraint with Iran.
Why was Iran's SS general in Iraq?
OK!
Again, why was Soleimani, a 40-year Revolutionary Guard and a General in Iraq?
I don’t know why he was there, I assume to do bad shit. That’s doesn’t mean we should green light a strike that could escalate the conflict unnecessarily. It was an act of war, and if Iran retaliates, we will have no choice but to escalate.
