how do you alt-right fringe high school educated guys rationalize this one?
Comments
-
Show me the video where Biden said "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?pawz said:
Boldface. Pathological. Liar.2001400ex said:
That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.pawz said:
How is this materially different than Biden'sApostleofGrief said:
I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.salemcoog said:
Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?ApostleofGrief said:
Both. Pay attention.salemcoog said:It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.
-
But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
Got it. Makes total sense now.
-
Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?PurpleThrobber said:
But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
Got it. Makes total sense now. -
that's not what the email shows and Biden didn't make the Shokin request in March 2016 as your opinion piece states. He made the push during a Dec 2015 trip to Ukraine. Realize that's not as convenient for your timeline but sorry to let facts get in your way.SFGbob said:
Actually the opinion piece links to the email exchange from 2016 that show Hunter Biden's name was invoked by Ukrainian officials as a reason why the State Department should help with ending the corruption probe.GDS said:
your opinion piece misrepresents when Biden made the request to Poroshenko pursuant to US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian anti-corruption advocate policy.SFGbob said:
I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/ -
There's 50,0002001400ex said:
Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?PurpleThrobber said:
But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
Got it. Makes total sense now.dollarsfacts per month that Hunter Biden pulled down. So, yes.
-
PurpleThrobber said:
But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
Got it. Makes total sense now.
Unfortunately the facts don't support that conclusion but if they did I'd have a yuge problem with it.
-
Where is his work on a board illegal or impeachable?PurpleThrobber said:
There's 50,0002001400ex said:
Have you looked at the facts and circumstances around Bidens comment?PurpleThrobber said:
But no problem when the tax payer funded quid pro quo protects the politician's personal and family interests.GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
Got it. Makes total sense now.dollarsfacts per month that Hunter Biden pulled down. So, yes. -
Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.
-
That part of $1 billion dollars do you not understand?2001400ex said:
Show me the video where Biden said "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?pawz said:
Boldface. Pathological. Liar.2001400ex said:
That's not what Biden said. I'd watch the video again. Then after that, I'd look at the facts and circumstances around his comment.pawz said:
How is this materially different than Biden'sApostleofGrief said:
I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.salemcoog said:
Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?ApostleofGrief said:
Both. Pay attention.salemcoog said:It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.
-
Where did race get his college degree?UW_Doog_Bot said:Just came here to say that it's a bold move for the guy with a degree from Central to call out education as the differentiation of intelligence.




