how do you alt-right fringe high school educated guys rationalize this one?
Comments
-
Biden actually said it, and they really did fire the investigator before they money was released? Just a guess.pawz said:
How is this material different than Biden's "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?ApostleofGrief said:
I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.salemcoog said:
Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?ApostleofGrief said:
Both. Pay attention.salemcoog said:It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.
-
Remember when Gay Bob said if Trump tried to extort Ukraine with a quid pro quo that he'd be in trouble?

-
Remember when you made this claim a few weeks back and showed that you were a liar who was misrepresenting what I actually said?insinceredawg said:Remember when Gay Bob said if Trump tried to extort Ukraine with a quid pro quo that he'd be in trouble?

-
Hearsay! No quid pro quo!insinceredawg said:
There it is. The clockwork shill now admits quid pro quo is okay as long it's his side doing it. So why did Trump repeatedly scream "NO QUID PRO QUO!" for the last couple months?pawz said:
Fucking this.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
As is EVERY negotiation. -
Dumber. Than. Hondo.insinceredawg said:
There it is. The clockwork shill now admits quid pro quo is okay as long it's his side doing it. So why did Trump repeatedly scream "NO QUID PRO QUO!" for the last couple months?pawz said:
Fucking this.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
As is EVERY negotiation.
And pressing. Hugely. -
The GOP is only left with the flimsy rationalization of "fighting corruption." Never mind it's a political opponent ahead of Trump in the polls! For which there is no evidence whatsoever of corruption.
-
and as usual you misrepresent the US position in regard to Shokin. The new prosecutor actually progressed on the once dormant investigation into the CEO of Burisma. Don't let the facts bog you down though....pawz said:
How is this materially different than Biden's "no aid if you DON'T stop investigating"?ApostleofGrief said:
I think you mean that if trump didn't say "no aid money unless you investigate"? It's a stupid argument, since his actions were known to Ukraine soon enough and actions speak louder than words. It wasn't all on the same day, but over the course of a short window of a couple of months when this happened.salemcoog said:
Only one can be proven. Or is the TDS so strong that burden of proof just doesn’t matter anymore?ApostleofGrief said:
Both. Pay attention.salemcoog said:It appears the quid pro quo was for a meeting, not a demand for investigation. No wonder Schiff and Company wanted all of this behind closed doors for over a month.
-
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept. -
Lots of TDS in this thread
-
I thought that investigating corruption and the Ukraine's role in the 2016 election was in our national interest?GDS said:
the problem becomes when a president uses tax payer funded aid in a quid pro quo to advance his own political interests.PurpleThrobber said:Life is one big quid pro quo
Loosers have a hard time grasping that concept.
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/



