Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tomorrow should be interesting...

2456

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,009
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    No we don't

    I googled it it show that you gave your usual mis characterization

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo

    What about the promise!!!!
    You don’t characterize a quid pro quo as a promise?
    Anyone see a set of goal posts go whizzing by?
    Quid pro quo - the PROMISE of something of value exchanged for an advantage or favor by return.
    @CrazyJoeBidenDawg, true?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    No we don't

    I googled it it show that you gave your usual mis characterization

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo

    What about the promise!!!!
    You don’t characterize a quid pro quo as a promise?
    Anyone see a set of goal posts go whizzing by?
    Quid pro quo - the PROMISE of something of value exchanged for an advantage or favor by return.
    Gosh, now all you have to do is show where it happened. I'm sure if you repeated enough times to yourself you can make it true.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    No we don't

    I googled it it show that you gave your usual mis characterization

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo

    What about the promise!!!!
    You don’t characterize a quid pro quo as a promise?
    Anyone see a set of goal posts go whizzing by?
    Quid pro quo - the PROMISE of something of value exchanged for an advantage or favor by return.
    Gosh, now all you have to do is show where it happened. I'm sure if you repeated enough times to yourself you can make it true.
    Mulvaney just admitted it. You must have missed it.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,641 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    No we don't

    I googled it it show that you gave your usual mis characterization

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo

    What about the promise!!!!
    You don’t characterize a quid pro quo as a promise?
    Anyone see a set of goal posts go whizzing by?
    Quid pro quo - the PROMISE of something of value exchanged for an advantage or favor by return.
    Gosh, now all you have to do is show where it happened. I'm sure if you repeated enough times to yourself you can make it true.
    Mulvaney just admitted it. You must have missed it.
    Mulvaney had an opinion.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    After trump gets impeached in the coming weeks, he’ll get his trial. That is the constitutionally appropriate forum to adjudicate this. Trumptards are just going to have to wait.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    The quid pro quo was for information on Ukraine's role in the 2016 election, not to acquire dirt on Biden.

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    There go those goalposts you were mentioning!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    There go those goalposts you were mentioning!

    That's been my position all along. You can look it up.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
    Are you stupid?

    Rhetorical
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
    Are you stupid?

    Rhetorical
    I knew you didn’t know who the “injured party” was.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
    Are you stupid?

    Rhetorical
    I knew you didn’t know who the “injured party” was.
    The Ukrainian president in this case

    How am I injured by not sending 400 million tax dollars to some shithole for arms they don't need?

    Don't hurt yourself
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
    Are you stupid?

    Rhetorical
    I knew you didn’t know who the “injured party” was.
    The Ukrainian president in this case

    How am I injured by not sending 400 million tax dollars to some shithole for arms they don't need?

    Don't hurt yourself
    Hey Mr. Rule of Law. The funding was approved by Congress and it was illegal for trump to interfere. You’ll be seeing a lot more of this at the impeachment vote and trump’s trial. If you don’t get it now, you will soon enough.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    Speaking of moving goalposts Blob now that a quid pro quo has been admitted to how are you going to defend Trump since you previously opined he should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo?

    Read the transcript

    No quid pro quo other than Joe Biden but still
    You should have told Mulvaney before he confirmed it...
    I posted the entire quote

    We also have the transcript and the alleged injured party saying it didn't happen

    Lets see what the Article of Impeachment says

    The American people say it didn’t happen?
    Are you stupid?

    Rhetorical
    I knew you didn’t know who the “injured party” was.
    The Ukrainian president in this case

    How am I injured by not sending 400 million tax dollars to some shithole for arms they don't need?

    Don't hurt yourself
    Hey Mr. Rule of Law. The funding was approved by Congress and it was illegal for trump to interfere. You’ll be seeing a lot more of this at the impeachment vote and trump’s trial. If you don’t get it now, you will soon enough.
    Wow

    Should make a great article of Impeachment if it were true which it isn't
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    There go those goalposts you were mentioning!

    That's been my position all along. You can look it up.
    don't worry Blob - we all knew your position was "flexible" once the quid pro quo was confirmed. Like it was today.

    Back the Uhaul up - Blob is going to need to move those goalpost a little further!!!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited October 2019
    GDS said:

    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    There go those goalposts you were mentioning!

    That's been my position all along. You can look it up.
    don't worry Blob - we all knew your position was "flexible" once the quid pro quo was confirmed. Like it was today.

    Back the Uhaul up - Blob is going to need to move those goalpost a little further!!!
    How have I moved the goal posts you lying Kunt? I've said from the beginning that if we were withhold $$$ to get information on Ukraine's role in the 2016 election then I'd support it. You recall the 2016 election investigation don't ya Kunt? That was the election all you liberals Kunts said that we needed to investigate. But when you no longer could tie the interference to Trump all you liberal Kunts lost interest.

    Well I didn't.


  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    So was today interesting?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club

    So was today interesting?

    3 pages in and we're still not sure
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    So was today interesting?

    3 pages in and we're still not sure
    That’s what I thought.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,782 Swaye's Wigwam

    So was today interesting?

    Very - I was listening to the radio this morning and the government broke in and ran the Great Shakeout (or whatever the fuck it was) with that gwad awful emergency beeping. I ran, I ducked, and realized it was practice only. Very interesting
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Wanting the truth is a bad thing now. You leftards want to pin a Russian lie on Trump. Trump wants to pin a Ukrainian truth and a chicom truth on Biden. Keep rooting for the away team.

    Trump lies basically every day.
    Sound familiar?
    Got that bonus check yet? I ate at ding how today. Was delicious. Liar.
    You pussed out. Twice. Nothing more need be said.
    So you back up your lie by lying. Wonder why you won't show up now. Liar.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738 Founders Club
    edited October 2019
    Is this the latest nothingburger fueling the Dems flaccid cuck dreams?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,705 Founders Club
    Is it interesting yet?

    If only we had a transcript of the call
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,881
    SFGbob said:

    I was told the same thing by O'Keefed, it must be true.
    I believe you know Daddy’s guilty. What’s your end game?