Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Washington Huskies football schedule
Comments
-
Who do you give a B ? The OOC schedule is more like a CDDX.
-
That's a rose bowl schedule right there - win or lose at Oregon. I don't expect Petersen to achieve that in his 1st year, but I certainly think he could. Great schedule except Sark forgot to give his backup qb's any meaningful reps. Miles was FORCED into action.
I've been railing on Sark for 2 years over this, more than any other topic, AND FOR GOOD DAGUMMED REASON! He fucked up our opportunity for a rose bowl last year (the year we absolutely should have gone) Now we need an Auburn miracle to reach Pasadena. I don't expect Pete to win more than 8, but he very well could do the unthinkable and win the North and beat UCLA for roses. That's what I'm hoping coach can accomplish. But if Grinolds or anybody here bung - rapes Coach for going 8-5 or 9-4, I'll send Vito in to whack your family in their beds. He gets 3-5 years.
-
Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5
-
9 min next year. The pieces are there.
-
Including a bowl game, anything less than ten wins is totally unacceptable.
-
Anything less than 10 with a new head coach and our starting QB on the cusp of playing at Pasadena CC next year? Firecrotch, you are a prime example of what's wrong with fanbases', college or pro.
-
dhdawg said:
Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5
It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?dhdawg said:Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5
-
it took sark 5 years cause he was a fucking clown, great coaches win 10 games with that schedule and everyone returning on both lines. I would give him another chance at 9, but at 8 he can LEAVE!
-
I gave a B to Illinois since they are in a real conference.
I would say a perennial top 20 team is an A, a team from a real conference is a B, and a cruddy team from a cruddy league, but a team that still plays with 85 scholarships, would be the C.
I am aware those days are over.Tailgater said:Who do you give a B ? The OOC schedule is more like a CDDX.
-
All the starting OL back, the whole front 7 on D. If we get good QB play, this should be a 10 win team. 8 wins would be disappointing.puppylove_sugarsteel said:dhdawg said:Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5
It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?dhdawg said:Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5
