Chicom Coolie Ding Dong Yang wants to Ban Air Travel
Comments
-
This doesn't work at scale for business or industry. It barely works for residential. Full stop.ThomasFremont said:
On the roof of a house. With a battery to store the excess and run at night.Sledog said:
Where are all those decentralized electrical generation plants?ThomasFremont said:
Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.SFGbob said:
The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.ThomasFremont said:
I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.SFGbob said:
Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.ThomasFremont said:
They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.RaceBannon said:Scale is the issue
When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention
Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s
Combine that with a transition away from coal towards nuclear power and you’d be making some serious gains.
Nuclear baseload, solar for daytime usage, and natural gas for ramp up or ramp down. Offset by reforestation and curbing desertification. These are the droids you are looking for.
There's no other possible engineering solution with available technology unless you want forced rationing. -
Not quite true.SFGbob said:
There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.ThomasFremont said:
Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.SFGbob said:
The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.ThomasFremont said:
I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.SFGbob said:
Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.ThomasFremont said:
They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.RaceBannon said:Scale is the issue
When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention
Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s
The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.
That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.
And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.
Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?
-
Define 'subsidies'.ThomasFremont said:Cancel all oil subsidies and we can talk about where the money should go.
The tax advantages oil companies get relative to accelerating exploration costs and depreciable assets aren't much different than the tax incentives renewable companies receive.
-
Solar on a massive scale should inl
More cow farts and it could be next week!PurpleThrobber said:
Not quite true.SFGbob said:
There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.ThomasFremont said:
Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.SFGbob said:
The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.ThomasFremont said:
I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.SFGbob said:
Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.ThomasFremont said:
They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.RaceBannon said:Scale is the issue
When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention
Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s
The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.
That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.
And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.
Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now? -
There is a lot of promising battery tech comming down the pipe. I hope a different flavor of battery storage passes up Lithium Ion. Lithium mining is pretty shitty for the environment.PurpleThrobber said:
Not quite true.SFGbob said:
There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.ThomasFremont said:
Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.SFGbob said:
The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.ThomasFremont said:
I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.SFGbob said:
Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.ThomasFremont said:
They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.RaceBannon said:Scale is the issue
When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention
Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s
The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.
That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.
And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.
Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?
There was a good Nat Geo article the other month about how one of the largest Lithium deposits lies in the world's largest salt flat in Bolivia, the Salar de Uyuni. It's a place where drug tourist go to trip and look at stars. I'm a strong supporter of battery tech but I'm an even stronger supporter of hallucinagenic drug trips in cool places. -
The US is undergoing reforestation and no desertification. That would be in noncapatilist countries.
-
Not really. Reclamation projects in extraction industries are highly bonded This ain't the 70's when mining companies just walked away and left Superfund cleanup sites. Lots of times mines are replaced with golf courses or they fill up the pits with water and build homes/2nd homes around the new 'lake'. Whole different beast than the greenies want to portray.RedRocket said:
There is a lot of promising battery tech comming down the pipe. I hope a different flavor of battery storage passes up Lithium Ion. Lithium mining is pretty shitty for the environment.PurpleThrobber said:
Not quite true.SFGbob said:
There is no technology for electrical storage on a massive scale, your response doesn't even address that fact and is essentially meaningless gibberish.ThomasFremont said:
Decentralized models are already effective at curbing waste and costs.SFGbob said:
The technology for electrical storage on a massive scale doesn't exist.ThomasFremont said:
I am aware that things are not currently set up for this. I’m saying we should set things up like this.SFGbob said:
Even if you increase solar and wind, you still have to build the infrastructure for fossil fuel electrical generation. There's no way to store energy generated by wind and solar for the periods when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.ThomasFremont said:
They’ve dragged their feet for decades. But you’re right. Traditional utilities have diversified into wind and solar at an increasing rate. The government could incentivize then to escalate that progress and we’d probably be better off. Better for the environment. Better for National security.RaceBannon said:Scale is the issue
When alternative energy scales for mass consumption someone will be there to cash in. It's not like nobody is working on it just because we dont have massive government intervention
Carbon purveyors have been cleaning some things up since the 60s
The next gen of lithium storage will be markedly better than current systems. I've seen some pretty cool stuff for commercial and residential systems.
That doesn't address a car's capacity -because then it becomes a weight vs. size vs. power issue. You could put a big ass battery in a Tesla but you'd lose the back seat. The nerds will eventually figure that shit out. But that's apples and oranges vs. wide scale storage of renewable energy.
And, trust me, I'm a dig shit out of the ground guy. Drill, baby, drill. Natural gas is the interim solution while the other technology catches up over the next five years or so.
Or whenever the world is scheduled to end. 10 year 8 months now?
There was a good Nat Geo article the other month about how one of the largest Lithium deposits lies in the world's largest salt flat in Bolivia, the Salar de Uyuni. It's a place where drug tourist go to trip and look at stars. I'm a strong supporter of battery tech but I'm an even stronger supporter of hallucinagenic drug trips in cool places.
You're sorta getting into my wheelhouse here. Sort of. Extraction, money, joobs. Not necessarily in that order.
-
Most mining occurs outside the US. Think the chicoms are worried about reclamation?
-
LOL SFGbob's source is the Manhattan Institute JFCSFGbob said:We aren't getting rid of fossil fuel power generation anytime soon and it's definitely not happening in any of our lifetimes.
https://www.manhattan-institute.org/green-energy-revolution-near-impossible. -
And MIT but Kunt's got to Kunt. You really believe I can't find that exact same information from other sources? The numbers are what they are, they didn't make them up.Gwad said:
LOL SFGbob's source is the Manhattan Institute JFCSFGbob said:We aren't getting rid of fossil fuel power generation anytime soon and it's definitely not happening in any of our lifetimes.
https://www.manhattan-institute.org/green-energy-revolution-near-impossible.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611683/the-25-trillion-reason-we-cant-rely-on-batteries-to-clean-up-the-grid/






