Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You all thought this was a playoff team.
haie
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,732 
Comments
-
uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
-
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives? -
I murdered him.DoogCourics said:
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives? -
If they had the right coaching staff, maybe, maybe this team makes the playoffs. They aren’t without a lack of talent on both sides of the ball, anyone can see that. But what they lack are coaches who know how to use that talent, scheme, and condition their players!
-
They didn't do much better than Browning did, in fucking Atlanta.PineapplePirate said:If they had the right coaching staff, maybe, maybe this team makes the playoffs. They aren’t without a lack of talent on both sides of the ball, anyone can see that. But what they lack are coaches who know how to use that talent, scheme, and condition their players!
Talent my ass. Win a 3rd in the North spot and pop off. -
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
-
I’m right here. Actually I just started to get back on the internet. I didn’t watch the game as usual and just found out not to long ago. My heart can’t take some of these games.DoogCourics said:
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives?
-
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
-
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic. -
He likes to disconnect when he’s on vacation with his family. But instead of Hawaii, I’d guess dj probably vacations in marble, WA based on his post historyDoogCourics said:
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives? -
Thought about moderating this comment. Decided it was too funny.PurpleJ said:
I murdered him.DoogCourics said:
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives? -
It’s to bad you continue to post from a position of ignorancentxduck said:
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
1) Brenden Schooler
2) Mycah Pittman
3) JJ6
4) Lance Wilhoite
5) Cam McCormick
6) JR Waters
I’m not sure whether Breeland played or not, he was not 100%
-
Lance Wilhoite is a 6’3” Freshman 4 star WR that the Ducks planned on. for big things. He was offered by Clemson, Auburn, Ohio State, Penn State among about 20 others.
Cam McCormick was named the starter in front of Breeland a year ago and then broke his foot.
Although not Quite as touted the Ducks really like 6’3” WR JR Waters -
Quit recruiting glass-jawed recieversDJDuck said:
It’s to bad you continue to post from a position of ignorancentxduck said:
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
1) Brenden Schooler
2) Mycah Pittman
3) JJ6
4) Lance Wilhoite
5) Cam McCormick
6) JR Waters
I’m not sure whether Breeland played or not, he was not 100% -
Cam is a tight end and wilhoite was redshirting regardless of the injury. So 4 WRs, 5 If you’re being generous. Still not 6.DJDuck said:
It’s to bad you continue to post from a position of ignorancentxduck said:
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
1) Brenden Schooler
2) Mycah Pittman
3) JJ6
4) Lance Wilhoite
5) Cam McCormick
6) JR Waters
I’m not sure whether Breeland played or not, he was not 100% -
DJDuck said:
I’m right here. Actually I just started to get back on the internet. I didn’t watch the game as usual and just found out not to long ago. My heart can’t take some of these games.DoogCourics said:
Speaking of....oregonblitzkrieg said:uh...no. Only DJDuck did, maybe.
After spamming this bored non-stop for the last few months, he's been eerily quiet tonight. What gives?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qekh6u7y_Cc -
NTX doesn’t comment on his ignorant post about the # of receivers that were out for the Auburn game........figures.
-
ntxduck said:
Cam is a tight end and wilhoite was redshirting regardless of the injury. So 4 WRs, 5 If you’re being generous. Still not 6.DJDuck said:
It’s to bad you continue to post from a position of ignorancentxduck said:
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
1) Brenden Schooler
2) Mycah Pittman
3) JJ6
4) Lance Wilhoite
5) Cam McCormick
6) JR Waters
I’m not sure whether Breeland played or not, he was not 100%
It’s literally 2 posts above yours you senile fuck. In what universe is cam McCormick a wide receiverDJDuck said:NTX doesn’t comment on his ignorant post about the # of receivers that were out for the Auburn game........figures.
-
Where is this talent? Is this just some made-up myopic fan bullshit backed up only by subjective insider nonsense about how even though these guys have never done anything and you've never heard of them, they are really good because the coaches mentioned in fall camp how they are really high on them?
-
You dumb fuck. I said receiver not wide receiver. Your such a childish little shit. If it makes you happy. Oregon had FIVE WIDE RECEIVERS OUT DUE TO INJURY...........ONE TIGHT END (who actually catches passes too) OUT DUE TO INJURY.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂ntxduck said:ntxduck said:
Cam is a tight end and wilhoite was redshirting regardless of the injury. So 4 WRs, 5 If you’re being generous. Still not 6.DJDuck said:
It’s to bad you continue to post from a position of ignorancentxduck said:
The # of WRs we were missing grows every time a quook posts. Yes Johnson and Pittman being out was the difference, but six? Johnson, schooler, Pittman and waters (who was never going to contribute if healthy). Who are the other 2 who were out?DJDuck said:
When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.ntxduck said:
Literally no one on this board except djduckFS thought that.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic.
1) Brenden Schooler
2) Mycah Pittman
3) JJ6
4) Lance Wilhoite
5) Cam McCormick
6) JR Waters
I’m not sure whether Breeland played or not, he was not 100%
It’s literally 2 posts above yours you senile fuck. In what universe is cam McCormick a wide receiverDJDuck said:NTX doesn’t comment on his ignorant post about the # of receivers that were out for the Auburn game........figures.
Does that make you feel better moron?😂😂😂😂😂😂
-
Here is my post you ignorant moron. Do you see the term “WIDE RECEIVER” or do you see the term “RECEIVER”. Take your Adderall .
“When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
*******************************************************************************
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
******************************+++++++++++++***********************
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic. -
Lol at trying to play off “receiver” as referring to a tight end
-
DJ Duck loves him a strawman argument
-
Lol we are going to bitch slap you in Husky StadiumDJDuck said:Here is my post you ignorant moron. Do you see the term “WIDE RECEIVER” or do you see the term “RECEIVER”. Take your Adderall .
“When did I ever say they were a playoff team? You are using a Strawman. The odds are formidable against any PAC 12 team getting into the playoff........they are pretty slim.
If you want something to actually quote me on rather than a bunch of lies, here it is.
*******************************************************************************
I think the Ducks are the best team and have the most talent in the league. We lost a close game with SIX receivers out. It is what it is.
******************************+++++++++++++***********************
I think Oregon can and should win the Conference. I see several problems in their way. The biggest one is their inability to win on the road. All our tough conference games are away. I think the Husky game is iffy for us being in Seattle. I would have more confidence if they learn to play on the road. Did I ever think Oregon would be in the College Footballl playoff. I really didn’t see it. I thought they had a chance given the personnel just like I think some of you do about the Huskies, but I really didn’t think that as realistic. -
Where is the Strawman argument? It is your side that has to resort to that. Good job of obfuscation though. Where did I say “WIDE RECEIVER” ?backthepack said:DJ Duck loves him a strawman argument
-
Ehl oh Ehl. You thought yours was too.haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
#liarslie
#worryaboutyourCalproblem -
It took Jerry Allen's Prediction that either Oregon or UW would be a playoff team 8 days in to the season to be dead.
-
Rent freehaie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
You should read my preseason editions. You’ll know everything that’s going to happen.
-
But how am I a doog?haie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El -
Was tongue in cheek with you because you've been shitting on your quarterback for a long time now.MikeSeaver said:
Rent freehaie said:Including @creepycoug
Secretly, even @MikeSeaver
El oh El
You should read my preseason editions. You’ll know everything that’s going to happen.
Just trying to stack page views.
