Bernie Sanders Tells Union Worker: “I’d ‘Absolutely’ Take Away Your Health Care Plan”

TheKobeStopper said:

I enjoy that the people most against Medicare For All have literally no clue what it even means.

Don't you get it. Bernie is taking away everyone's healthcare by giving them healthcare.

dhdawg said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I enjoy that the people most against Medicare For All have literally no clue what it even means.

I enjoy how people for it think it's free and have no clue how to pay for it.

The democrat voter just knows that someone else is going to be paying for their free healthcare.

Of the people that support Medicare for all that's their biggest motivation. "Free" shit. And as you saw with the poll numbers even the parasites who what more "free" shit from the government once they found out it wasn't going to be "free" their support disappeared and that's why Harris is no longer talking about Medicare for All

http://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/1024238486541484032?lang=en

Gosh Hondo, why are you showing me a poll from last year? As soon as people found out that the "costs" were going to include an increase in taxes and the loss of their private insurance support for it fucking cratered.

Link?

Gofuckyourself.com

Lil lyin Bob can't back up his mouth again. Pussy.

There's no point in trying to educate your ignorant ass Hondo. If you're so fucking uninformed that you're not aware that support for "Medicare for All" drops like a stone when you tell people that it will cause them to lose their private insurance and pay higher taxes, something that has been discussed here a number a times, then there's no point in discussing the issue with such an ignorant dumbfuck. I will administer a swift steel toed boot to your snatch if you like because I believe that may be the one thing that might help you.

Lol lyin Bob again. You just can't help yourself.

Hell Hondo, you even previously posted that exact same fucking stupid Fox Online poll. Like I said, there's no point trying to educate your ignorant ass. This is just one of the many times this information has been posted here.



The poll found that Americans initially support “Medicare-for-all,” 56 percent to 42 percent.

However, those numbers shifted dramatically when people were asked about the potential impact, pro and con.

Support increased when people were told “Medicare-for-all” would guarantee health insurance as a right (71 percent) and eliminate premiums and reduce out-of-pocket costs (67 percent).

But if they were told that a government-run system could lead to delays in getting care or higher taxes, support plunged to 26 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Support fell to 32 percent if it would threaten the current Medicare program.

“The issue that will really be fundamental would be the tax issue,” said Robert Blendon, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who reviewed the poll. He pointed out that state single-payer efforts in Vermont and Colorado failed because of concerns about the tax increases needed to put them in place.

"Delays in getting care"

No country with universal healthcare has wait times for mandatory procedures, elective procedures maybe.

Sounds like a much better way to ration care than how we do it, which is based on how much money you have.

Uhh, you are full of shit. There are 1000's of documented instances of people coming to this country to get life saving "mandatory" (whatever that means) procedures. My own family member had to come down from Canada for life saving breast cancer treatment. She was told to wait 12 weeks in Canada. 12 weeks would have meant her life. A customer from Europe came here for Prostate surgery, saving his life as well. His wait was months in Europe.

If you are going to just spew lies, do it somewhere else or educate yourself before spouting off.

dhdawg said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I enjoy that the people most against Medicare For All have literally no clue what it even means.

I enjoy how people for it think it's free and have no clue how to pay for it.

The democrat voter just knows that someone else is going to be paying for their free healthcare.

Of the people that support Medicare for all that's their biggest motivation. "Free" shit. And as you saw with the poll numbers even the parasites who what more "free" shit from the government once they found out it wasn't going to be "free" their support disappeared and that's why Harris is no longer talking about Medicare for All

http://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/1024238486541484032?lang=en

Gosh Hondo, why are you showing me a poll from last year? As soon as people found out that the "costs" were going to include an increase in taxes and the loss of their private insurance support for it fucking cratered.

Link?

Gofuckyourself.com

Lil lyin Bob can't back up his mouth again. Pussy.

There's no point in trying to educate your ignorant ass Hondo. If you're so fucking uninformed that you're not aware that support for "Medicare for All" drops like a stone when you tell people that it will cause them to lose their private insurance and pay higher taxes, something that has been discussed here a number a times, then there's no point in discussing the issue with such an ignorant dumbfuck. I will administer a swift steel toed boot to your snatch if you like because I believe that may be the one thing that might help you.

Lol lyin Bob again. You just can't help yourself.

Hell Hondo, you even previously posted that exact same fucking stupid Fox Online poll. Like I said, there's no point trying to educate your ignorant ass. This is just one of the many times this information has been posted here.



The poll found that Americans initially support “Medicare-for-all,” 56 percent to 42 percent.

However, those numbers shifted dramatically when people were asked about the potential impact, pro and con.

Support increased when people were told “Medicare-for-all” would guarantee health insurance as a right (71 percent) and eliminate premiums and reduce out-of-pocket costs (67 percent).

But if they were told that a government-run system could lead to delays in getting care or higher taxes, support plunged to 26 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Support fell to 32 percent if it would threaten the current Medicare program.

“The issue that will really be fundamental would be the tax issue,” said Robert Blendon, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who reviewed the poll. He pointed out that state single-payer efforts in Vermont and Colorado failed because of concerns about the tax increases needed to put them in place.

"Delays in getting care"

No country with universal healthcare has wait times for mandatory procedures, elective procedures maybe.

Sounds like a much better way to ration care than how we do it, which is based on how much money you have.

That is pure crap.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/13/nhs-operation-waiting-lists-reach-10-year-high-at-43m-patients

GDS said:

Bendintheriver said:

dhdawg said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

Sledog said:

TheKobeStopper said:

I enjoy that the people most against Medicare For All have literally no clue what it even means.

I enjoy how people for it think it's free and have no clue how to pay for it.

The democrat voter just knows that someone else is going to be paying for their free healthcare.

Of the people that support Medicare for all that's their biggest motivation. "Free" shit. And as you saw with the poll numbers even the parasites who what more "free" shit from the government once they found out it wasn't going to be "free" their support disappeared and that's why Harris is no longer talking about Medicare for All

http://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/1024238486541484032?lang=en

Gosh Hondo, why are you showing me a poll from last year? As soon as people found out that the "costs" were going to include an increase in taxes and the loss of their private insurance support for it fucking cratered.

Link?

Gofuckyourself.com

Lil lyin Bob can't back up his mouth again. Pussy.

There's no point in trying to educate your ignorant ass Hondo. If you're so fucking uninformed that you're not aware that support for "Medicare for All" drops like a stone when you tell people that it will cause them to lose their private insurance and pay higher taxes, something that has been discussed here a number a times, then there's no point in discussing the issue with such an ignorant dumbfuck. I will administer a swift steel toed boot to your snatch if you like because I believe that may be the one thing that might help you.

Lol lyin Bob again. You just can't help yourself.

Hell Hondo, you even previously posted that exact same fucking stupid Fox Online poll. Like I said, there's no point trying to educate your ignorant ass. This is just one of the many times this information has been posted here.



The poll found that Americans initially support “Medicare-for-all,” 56 percent to 42 percent.

However, those numbers shifted dramatically when people were asked about the potential impact, pro and con.

Support increased when people were told “Medicare-for-all” would guarantee health insurance as a right (71 percent) and eliminate premiums and reduce out-of-pocket costs (67 percent).

But if they were told that a government-run system could lead to delays in getting care or higher taxes, support plunged to 26 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Support fell to 32 percent if it would threaten the current Medicare program.

“The issue that will really be fundamental would be the tax issue,” said Robert Blendon, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who reviewed the poll. He pointed out that state single-payer efforts in Vermont and Colorado failed because of concerns about the tax increases needed to put them in place.

"Delays in getting care"

No country with universal healthcare has wait times for mandatory procedures, elective procedures maybe.

Sounds like a much better way to ration care than how we do it, which is based on how much money you have.

Uhh, you are full of shit. There are 1000's of documented instances of people coming to this country to get life saving "mandatory" (whatever that means) procedures. My own family member had to come down from Canada for life saving breast cancer treatment. She was told to wait 12 weeks in Canada. 12 weeks would have meant her life. A customer from Europe came here for Prostate surgery, saving his life as well. His wait was months in Europe.

If you are going to just spew lies, do it somewhere else or educate yourself before spouting off.

JFC Atl just stop lying man. If someone needs cancer surgery in Canada and it’s deemed to be life or limb saving you see the surgeon within 24 hours and are under the knife 24 hours later. Why do you constantly lie on an anonymous message board?

Isn't that nice of the government. If it's "life saving" they'll get you in a timely matter. And if the government decides that you can live with for a few months they'll get around to you later.