Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Yankoff

1356

Comments

  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,153 Swaye's Wigwam
    McLovin said:

    How does Kaho's inability to get into UW due to failing his summer language class make us look like chumps?
    I'll just give you a "Fuck Off" as I'm going to just assume you are being sarcastic.
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 5,115 Standard Supporter
    Oregon waived it for Cody Shear.
  • PetermanPeterman Member Posts: 675
    dtd said:

    Oregon waived it for Cody Shear.

    Just cuz Oregon chose to be cucked doesn't mean everyone has to
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2019
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    Ahem,
    #hotmosstertakes
  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    In years past, denying the waiver would’ve made total sense and no one would’ve batted an eye. And I would’ve completely agreed with it.

    This move worries me now though because we’ve entered the transfer portal era... where 90% of kids are getting immediate eligibility for the vaguest of reasons. Other Pac12 teams have been granting immediate eligibility for intra-conference transfers too.

    Perception can be reality, and now the perception is that Pete’s old school move here is malicious towards the player. I can almost guarantee that other coaches will use this as a negative recruiting tool against UW moving forward
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,437
    NEsnake12 said:

    In years past, denying the waiver would’ve made total sense and no one would’ve batted an eye. And I would’ve completely agreed with it.

    This move worries me now though because we’ve entered the transfer portal era... where 90% of kids are getting immediate eligibility for the vaguest of reasons. Other Pac12 teams have been granting immediate eligibility for intra-conference transfers too.

    Perception can be reality, and now the perception is that Pete’s old school move here is malicious towards the player. I can almost guarantee that other coaches will use this as a negative recruiting tool against UW moving forward

    Are they really, though, or are just a few high profile ones making it seem that way?
  • BeerThirtyBeerThirty Member Posts: 2,465
    Again, Pete told him if he went in conference, the rule would not be waived. He chose to go in conference. His choice. Colson needs to be a bit more mature and deal with it.

    Didn't kids need to sit out 2 years if they transferred in conference not too long ago?
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,949 Swaye's Wigwam
    NEsnake12 said:

    In years past, denying the waiver would’ve made total sense and no one would’ve batted an eye. And I would’ve completely agreed with it.

    This move worries me now though because we’ve entered the transfer portal era... where 90% of kids are getting immediate eligibility for the vaguest of reasons. Other Pac12 teams have been granting immediate eligibility for intra-conference transfers too.

    Perception can be reality, and now the perception is that Pete’s old school move here is malicious towards the player. I can almost guarantee that other coaches will use this as a negative recruiting tool against UW moving forward

    "Hey, kid, you know that one rule that all the schools in the Pac-12 agreed to that intra-conference transfers must sit out a year? Well, Coach Pete at UW actually follows it! Why would you ever want to play for someone like that?"
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    We still could have not granted him his release from his LOI and forced him to sit out the season. I think Petersen wanted a clean break tho.
    After Jude's masterpiece of journalistic malpractice I'm not sure he even really had a choice. The perception of blocking him after the whole "he lost 20 pounds" episode could have been disastrous.
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,538 Founders Club
    I don't see the point of blocking a kid who was going to be 4th/5th on the QB depth chart had he stayed until the end of the year, but Pete told Yankoff if he goes to another Pac-12 school there would be no waiver granted and so that's what happened.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    godawgst said:

    I don't see the point of blocking a kid who was going to be 4th/5th on the QB depth chart had he stayed until the end of the year, but Pete told Yankoff if he goes to another Pac-12 school there would be no waiver granted and so that's what happened.

    there is no longer analysis by pete. Kaho fucked us and Pete learned, as he always does. you transfer in-conference, you're blocked for a year. doesn't matter who you are or how inconsequential you'll be - blocked. it's communicated clearly up front and the kids are free to decide where to transfer knowing the rules.
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 12,499
    Yankoff's only chance at ever playing a meaningful snap is if he pulls a Eric Bjornson and switches to WR. He sucks donkey dick as a QB.
  • animateanimate Member Posts: 4,245
    godawgst said:

    I don't see the point of blocking a kid who was going to be 4th/5th on the QB depth chart had he stayed until the end of the year, but Pete told Yankoff if he goes to another Pac-12 school there would be no waiver granted and so that's what happened.

    the point is consistency of rules, expectations and application for pete and the player/recruit
Sign In or Register to comment.