Yankoff
Comments
-
His athleticism might make up for his lack of accuracy in UCLA's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Yankoff's only chance at ever playing a meaningful snap is if he pulls a Eric Bjornson and switches to WR. He sucks donkey dick as a QB.
-
Was hoping to see a wilddoog or lil of triple optiondnc said:
His athleticism might make up for his lack of accuracy in UCLA's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Yankoff's only chance at ever playing a meaningful snap is if he pulls a Eric Bjornson and switches to WR. He sucks donkey dick as a QB.
-
RIP WildYankFirePete said:
Was hoping to see a wilddoog or lil of triple optiondnc said:
His athleticism might make up for his lack of accuracy in UCLA's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Yankoff's only chance at ever playing a meaningful snap is if he pulls a Eric Bjornson and switches to WR. He sucks donkey dick as a QB.
-
Not so fast my frendnc said:
RIP WildYankFirePete said:
Was hoping to see a wilddoog or lil of triple optiondnc said:
His athleticism might make up for his lack of accuracy in UCLA's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Yankoff's only chance at ever playing a meaningful snap is if he pulls a Eric Bjornson and switches to WR. He sucks donkey dick as a QB.
-
My take is that Chip said he wanted him and Yankoff said "Pete said I'll be blocked" and Chip said "meh, don't worry about that. once you transfer he'll be fine and we'll get you playing...it's not a big deal." So, Yankoff trusted him and transferred and then Chip had someone call Pete to ask about releasing the transfer since the kid's a good kid and won't really play anyway (secretly chip is relying on Yankoff's running ability for some spread options) and expected Pete to "sure whatever" but Pete had his people (the ones who threw Kim's coat out of Pete's office) "nope. we were clear."
so now Yankoff is like "fuck..." and Chip is like "fuck..." and UCLA fans are like "fuck...there goes our Pac 12 Championship" and Pete's like "fuck...you!" -
There's also the possibility that Petersen doesn't like the idea of his more-complicated-than-the-plot-of-Primer offense being exported to a conference foe, packaged up neatly in a former player's skull. We may not see the point of holding back a would-be fifth string QB in terms of available playing time, but I can absolutely see the value in discouraging a player from bringing your offensive reads/cues to an opponent you'll definitely play in the course of that player's career.
Petersen thinks there's value in Eastern not knowing who the starting quarterback will be. We're supposed to think he'll just be okay with UCLA owning a copy of the playbook? This isn't petty or malicious, it's just attention to detail run amok. If another program wants to negatively recruit using this anecdote, the proper response would be, "Yeah, I hated to do that to Colson, but I was WAY more concerned at the time with the remaining 85 guys in my program winning as many games as possible. You want to come play for a coach that anal-retentively dedicated to winning?"
At this point, I think fears of avenues for negative recruiting are pretty unfounded. I don't see how it would be possible to negatively recruit against Chris Petersen. Unless the PSA in question is a kicker who can hit from 45... -
Yankoff was putting toxic ideas into the head of Sirmon anyways. Sirmon is going to be the best backup QB husky football has ever had.
-
I like it. It sets a precedent. Doesn't matter that he sucks. Now, if a player that is actually good wants to transfer we can say, look, you can transfer, but you'll have to sit out a year if it is in conference. We don't want players going to Oregon or SC after spring ball because they have a couple injuries and need a LB and the dad wants a bag.
-
Anal-retentive? Sounds hot.1to392831weretaken said:There's also the possibility that Petersen doesn't like the idea of his more-complicated-than-the-plot-of-Primer offense being exported to a conference foe, packaged up neatly in a former player's skull. We may not see the point of holding back a would-be fifth string QB in terms of available playing time, but I can absolutely see the value in discouraging a player from bringing your offensive reads/cues to an opponent you'll definitely play in the course of that player's career.
Petersen thinks there's value in Eastern not knowing who the starting quarterback will be. We're supposed to think he'll just be okay with UCLA owning a copy of the playbook? This isn't petty or malicious, it's just attention to detail run amok. If another program wants to negatively recruit using this anecdote, the proper response would be, "Yeah, I hated to do that to Colson, but I was WAY more concerned at the time with the remaining 85 guys in my program winning as many games as possible. You want to come play for a coach that anal-retentively dedicated to winning?"
At this point, I think fears of avenues for negative recruiting are pretty unfounded. I don't see how it would be possible to negatively recruit against Chris Petersen. Unless the PSA in question is a kicker who can hit from 45... -
The point is not setting a precedent. It probably doesnt really matter with Yankoff but what if next year Puca Nacua or Cam Davis wants to go play at USC and play immediately. Well, you just let a kid do that last year, now you're telling a kid of color he has to sit out but you let the white kid do it. And then the floodgates open.godawgst said:I don't see the point of blocking a kid who was going to be 4th/5th on the QB depth chart had he stayed until the end of the year, but Pete told Yankoff if he goes to another Pac-12 school there would be no waiver granted and so that's what happened.
