MSNBC just two minutes ago...
Comments
-
Yeah, why start now.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
What the left knows is that many of their voters are stupid like both of these Kunts and the ones that aren't stupid they know are dishonest just like HC and Scotty and they'll happily repeat this lie as if it were true.
-
Really? Then post it. Liar.HardlyClothed said:This new lie on the right that actually he didn’t call them “fine people” (which he did, on camera, in view of everyone) shows how easy it is to just lie to all the hooting conservative morons like Bob who will then eat it up
-
The Char
Ooooh, Owl comes in for an ankle bite.HustlinOwl said:
Yeah, why start now.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
You actually interpret the above so support your point, HC? It's clear as day Trump distinguished the neo-Nazis from the "very fine people."HardlyClothed said:REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
“Very fine people” on the side of the neo-Nazis who showed up to Charlottesville. You can stop lying to yourselves and everyone else.
You libs will contort yourselves into pretzels to manufacture falsehoods.
Like you just did here.
Never breed. One of you is enough. -
Is the media dividing the nation ThudBomberFS?TurdBomber said:
You actually interpret the above so support your point, HC? It's clear as day Trump distinguished the neo-Nazis from the "very fine people."HardlyClothed said:REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
“Very fine people” on the side of the neo-Nazis who showed up to Charlottesville. You can stop lying to yourselves and everyone else.
You libs will contort yourselves into pretzels to manufacture falsehoods.
Like you just did here.
Never breed. One of you is enough. -
The people Trump "condemned totally."HardlyClothed said:
Who were the non neo-Nazis in Charlottesville? The ones chanting “jews will not replace us” while huddled around the Robert E Lee statue. There were only white supremacisr confederacy humpers on that side.SFGbob said:
It's almost as if you're nothing more than dishonest piece of shit who has no interest in the truth. He goes on to say specifically that he isn't talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists when he refers to "fine people" but you don't quote that part of his statement because you're dishonest piece of shit.HardlyClothed said:REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
“Very fine people” on the side of the neo-Nazis who showed up to Charlottesville. You can stop lying to yourselves and everyone else.
Any other questions, dumbass? -
"Intersectionality" is what links them. And the Left owns that 100%.dhdawg said:
The casual racism of linking together Black Lives Matter with Antifa and Neo-Nazis.Sledog said:
The dems created ANTIFA and BLM and all the other true hate groups. They fund them and direct them. It's nothing more than paid thuggery. Arranged paid protests and violence and then democrat local governments that allow them to attack people and "give them room to riot".RaceBannon said:Biden praised Antifa
Fuck all of those people with a rust razor encrusted cheese grater.
GFY.
Try again, DH Dawg. That race card effort fails. -
Yes. Unquestionably. Duh.CirrhosisDawg said:
Is the media dividing the nation ThudBomberFS?TurdBomber said:
You actually interpret the above so support your point, HC? It's clear as day Trump distinguished the neo-Nazis from the "very fine people."HardlyClothed said:REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
“Very fine people” on the side of the neo-Nazis who showed up to Charlottesville. You can stop lying to yourselves and everyone else.
You libs will contort yourselves into pretzels to manufacture falsehoods.
Like you just did here.
Never breed. One of you is enough. -
Damn, that’s a shame.TurdBomber said:
Yes. Unquestionably. Duh.CirrhosisDawg said:
Is the media dividing the nation ThudBomberFS?TurdBomber said:
You actually interpret the above so support your point, HC? It's clear as day Trump distinguished the neo-Nazis from the "very fine people."HardlyClothed said:REPORTER: You said there was hatred and violence on both sides?
TRUMP: I do think there is blame – yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don't have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.
REPORTER: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.
TRUMP: Excuse me, they didn't put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.
“Very fine people” on the side of the neo-Nazis who showed up to Charlottesville. You can stop lying to yourselves and everyone else.
You libs will contort yourselves into pretzels to manufacture falsehoods.
Like you just did here.
Never breed. One of you is enough. -
Just dropped in to say that I laugh that the party of birther, "need to pass it to see what's in it", pizzagate, Seth Rich, Benghazi, etc. has issue with the left being liars.
-
That's a good Kunt. The only person I've seen here talk about either Pizzagate or Seth Rich is you. Now you have two of your pals right here pushing the Chartlottesville lie and you say nothing but bring up a Pizzagate which I've only ever seen you refer to.2001400ex said:Just dropped in to say that I laugh that the party of birther, "need to pass it to see what's in it", pizzagate, Seth Rich, Benghazi, etc. has issue with the left being liars.
-
Bob thinks this board encompasses the entire right. Not to mention you weren't even here when that went down.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt. The only person I've seen here talk about either Pizzagate or Seth Rich is you. Now you have two of your pals right here pushing the Chartlottesville lie and you say nothing but bring up a Pizzagate which I've only ever seen you refer to.2001400ex said:Just dropped in to say that I laugh that the party of birther, "need to pass it to see what's in it", pizzagate, Seth Rich, Benghazi, etc. has issue with the left being liars.
-
JFC people. Watch the press conference. He specially called the neo nazi type and ANTIFA bad people.
Also, BLM was founded on a lie, and perpetrated by myths. -
It is truly an amazing thing to watch. These fucking idiots can read the quotes where Trump was NOT giving praise to the scum neo nazi's yet they still continue the lie.
-
Hondo fucks strawman ass because he is both stupid and a liar. I'm here now and today you have two leftists lying through their fucking teeth and you are saying nothing about it.2001400ex said:
Bob thinks this board encompasses the entire right. Not to mention you weren't even here when that went down.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt. The only person I've seen here talk about either Pizzagate or Seth Rich is you. Now you have two of your pals right here pushing the Chartlottesville lie and you say nothing but bring up a Pizzagate which I've only ever seen you refer to.2001400ex said:Just dropped in to say that I laugh that the party of birther, "need to pass it to see what's in it", pizzagate, Seth Rich, Benghazi, etc. has issue with the left being liars.
Bringing up Pizzagate, which again I've only seen you here ever refer to it, is just more of that standard Hondo the Kunt deflection. -
They can't. They're cucked. TDS is Real. And untreatable.MikeDamone said:JFC people. Watch the press conference. He specially called the neo nazi type and ANTIFA bad people.
Also, BLM was founded on a lie, and perpetrated by myths. -
The dumbass conservatives are telling us not to believe our eyes and ears. Because he condemned them earlier in his comments doesn’t mean that he didn’t also call them (the neo-Nazis gathered at Charlottesville) very fine people. He doesn’t get credit for condemning them when he turns around and says what he said. It’s not that fucking complicated. He’s not absolved for his very fine people statement because he “totally condemned” them. He still said it.
-
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
You really are a retard, HC. Doubling down on your hysteria? Must be your uterus again.HardlyClothed said:The dumbass conservatives are telling us not to believe our eyes and ears. Because he condemned them earlier in his comments doesn’t mean that he didn’t also call them (the neo-Nazis gathered at Charlottesville) very fine people. He doesn’t get credit for condemning them when he turns around and says what he said. It’s not that fucking complicated. He’s not absolved for his very fine people statement because he “totally condemned” them. He still said it.
Put down the pussyhat and cut back on the estrogen, MC. It's turned you into a complete idiot. -
this really is. It's fucking amazing the mental gymnastics going on right nowBendintheriver said:It is truly an amazing thing to watch. These fucking idiots can read the quotes where Trump was NOT giving praise to the scum neo nazi's yet they still continue the lie.
-
HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people."
-
If you believe that, then you also believe that he was calling Antifa "very fine people." No way around that. But when you don't care about the truth or facts and you're committed to a lie why bother relying on logic and what people actually say.HardlyClothed said:
The “context” doesn’t refute that he was talking about the neo-Nazis in charlottesville when he said “very fine people”. No way around that.SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people." -
All I see is division and disunity coming at a time when I hear we’re supposed to come together. Sad.
-
And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
Run along little man. This is a grownup argument.CirrhosisDawg said:All I see is division and disunity coming at a time when I hear we’re supposed to come together. Sad.
-
This is sowing division ThudBomberFS. How is this helpful to creating unity?TurdBomber said:
Run along little man. This is a grownup argument.CirrhosisDawg said:All I see is division and disunity coming at a time when I hear we’re supposed to come together. Sad.
-
Like history the commies will cherry pick, distort, falsify and delete anything for their "ends".SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I post the entire context of his comments. It's so "dishonest" to provide the entirety of what he said.HardlyClothed said:
That’s not the “very fine people” quote where he’s explicitly talking about the people there in a Charlottesville. Bob is dishonest to the core. But we already knew that.SFGbob said:
The only fucking liar here is you Scotty.GDS said:
What a fucking liar. Trump was referring to the group that was there that fucking day not some abstract group of people who disagree with the removal of a statue. There was no one that went down there that day that didn't figure out very fucking fast that was not a place for "very fine people" to hang out. What a dishonest POS you are Blob.SFGbob said:
More lies from this Kunt.GDS said:Blob thinks that "very fine people" who rock up and see White nationalists like Spencer, Duke, Cantwell and many many others with tiki torches chanting Jews will not replace us think that's a great movement to join up and help out. If a someone did want to head down there that day, any "very fine people" turned right the fuck around if they had an ounce of integrity once they saw what that rally was truly about. There were no very fine people there that day on the side of the neo-nazis.
I think that there are "fine people" who disagree with the removal of statues of historical figures. And as Trump rightfully and prophetically point out, where does this stop? Are Washington and Jefferson next?
And as we now see in SF the answer is yes, they are next.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nativeson/article/It-starts-with-painting-over-murals-and-removing-14074876.php?psid=g7fmu
But since you're a dishonest Kunt, you can't argue this point so you lie. It's what leftists like you do.
The issue of removing historical statues didn't start that day Kunt and Trump specifically referenced the removal of not only the Robert E. Lee statute but also the possible removal of other historical statues.
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same."
Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?"
Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue?
"So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.
But Scotty the lying Kunt "knows" Trump really was calling them "fine people."
The ends is them taking the property of people that were willing to work while they were lazy and forcing everyone but the "party elite" into equal misery or if you don't like that there is always the gulags, forced slave labor and dying by starvation and overwork or firing squad.
That's how it has always been done and these useless fucks want more of it.
I say "Molon Labe" to you dickless cowardly twats! -
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people." -
A Pinko Faggot Commie talking about neo-Nazi's. That's special shit.HardlyClothed said:
I just went over this. That quote is from a different part of the press conference. He also called the neo-Nazis very fine people. You can find the transcript in this thread. So the explanation is either he fucked up when speaking or he didn’t actually condemn them. What’s your defense?SFGbob said:And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.
Weird way to call them "very fine people."
