Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Are ya Woke now Oberlin?

13»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,870 Founders Club
    The green new deal isn't about clean energy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Link?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    On the violations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,261 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    On the violations.

    Trump is a known adulterer and Mayor Pete likes men. What links are you looking for?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Bootlicker has to lick boots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Sodomy and adultery are always good

    Hth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,063
    Pitchfork51 said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Sodomy and adultery are always good

    Hth
    Whynotboth.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    On the violations.

    Trump is a known adulterer and Mayor Pete likes men. What links are you looking for?
    I guess we'll wait for the fire and brimstone to decide. Oh yeah it did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,045
    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Link?
    JFC
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,045
    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    On the violations.

    Trump is a known adulterer and Mayor Pete likes men. What links are you looking for?
    I guess we'll wait for the fire and brimstone to decide. Oh yeah it did.
    Do you ever have any good sauce? Ever?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dflea said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Bootlicker has to lick boots.
    Is that what you call what you do in service for El Monte?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Well of course they are lying just to get votes. That’s what politicians do. And the higher the level of election, the more incentive to lie there is. You are correct that if you take the word of these candidates to heart, they are bordering on the lunacy of Oberlin.

    The political pendulum is what got Trump elected. And the effect of that now has that pendulum swinging harder and faster to the left than it has in modern times. And all the candidates are racing as far and fast as they can to out lib each other.

    But they All know that they can’t put their words into action if elected. It’s a Dog n Pony show.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,748 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2019
    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    On the violations.

    Trump is a known adulterer and Mayor Pete likes men. What links are you looking for?
    I guess we'll wait for the fire and brimstone to decide. Oh yeah it did.
    Do you ever have any good sauce? Ever?
    More than you. You ain't exactly Buddy Hackett.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Bootlicker has to lick boots.
    Is that what you call what you do in service for El Monte?
    No. Now go fuck off, you fucking pussy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Bootlicker has to lick boots.
    Is that what you call what you do in service for El Monte?
    No. Now go fuck off, you fucking pussy.
    Naaah, your pet name for El Monte’s bunghole is “boot”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    SFGbob said:

    dflea said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    TurdBomber said:

    @SFGBob: Maybe 3/4ths of the Dem candidates seem like Oberlin material based on their pandering on the campaign trail, but you know better than to take any politician of any party at their word. CC has it right that Oberlin is a Sawant ideology embracing campus but that doesn't mean 3/4ths of the Dems would govern from that same spot on the spectrum. In fact, a brief study of the last 30 years would tell you that most of the voting public in this country is not where Oberlin is, including the Dems you're citing. It's a little early in the race to be making sweeping judgments because at this point the only rule is "say anything to get primary votes." And the primaries draw all the nut jobs out early.

    I agree but I wasn't talking about the average voting public. I was talking about the average Rat who is currently running for President. And where someone like Bernie or Mayor Pete may be able to govern from isn't the same as where their personal political positions my really be.

    Obama is a great example of someone who was much further left than he was able to govern from.

    Yeah you can dismiss Oberlin student body as a bunch of far left radicals as O'Keefed was trying to do, but the reality is that many of the people currently running for President are every bit as radical in their positions. I can only basis my opinions on what the candidates are actually saying, If they're lying just to get votes that's on them not me.

    Pete will govern while bent over the couch!
    Sodomy and adultery are both sins according the good book, Sled. Why is one OK in a POTUS and the other not?
    Bootlicker has to lick boots.
    Is that what you call what you do in service for El Monte?
    No. Now go fuck off, you fucking pussy.
    Naaah, your pet name for El Monte’s bunghole is “boot”
    My pet name for you is fucking pussy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    creepycoug said:

    Sledog said:

    YellowSnow said:

    Sledog said:

    On the violations.

    Trump is a known adulterer and Mayor Pete likes men. What links are you looking for?
    I guess we'll wait for the fire and brimstone to decide. Oh yeah it did.
    Do you ever have any good sauce? Ever?
    Does Fire Sauce count?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    ‘Despicable and indefensible’: Legal Insurrection’s thread with details from Gibson’s Bakery v. Oberlin College trial is ‘a must read’


    https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/06/15/despicable-and-indefensible-legal-insurrections-thread-with-details-from-gibsons-bakery-v-oberlin-college-trial-is-a-must-read/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter